改良高强度玻璃离子ART技术治疗儿童乳牙龋齿疗效分析

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2021.03.011

上海口腔医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 278-282.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2021.03.011

改良高强度玻璃离子ART技术治疗儿童乳牙龋齿疗效分析

刘子晗, 马浩然, 苗芬, 周淑

南京医科大学附属儿童医院口腔科,江苏南京 210000

收稿日期:2020-07-06 修回日期:2020-10-14 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-08-05
通讯作者: 周淑,E-mail:280420491@qq.com
作者简介:刘子晗（1987-）,女,硕士,主治医师,E-mail: zihanshell@126.com
基金资助:
南京医科大学科技发展项目（NMUB2019211)

Analysis of the effect of improved ART with high-intensity glass ionomer cement in the treatment of primary caries in children

LIU Zi-han, MA Hao-ran, MIAO Fen, ZHOU Shu

Department of Stomatology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu Province, China

Received:2020-07-06 Revised:2020-10-14 Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 探讨改良高强度玻璃离子非创伤性修复治疗技术（atraumatic restorative treatment,ART）在儿童乳牙龋齿治疗中的作用,并分析其疗效。方法: 前瞻性选择2018年8月—2019年5月于南京医科大学附属儿童医院接受治疗的262例2~5岁乳牙患龋儿童作为对象,以随机数原则对所有儿童编号,分为改良ART组（131例,177颗患牙）和对照组（131例,178颗患牙）,对照组以常规备洞及复合树脂充填治疗,ART组以改良高强度玻璃离子做ART治疗。比较2组患儿的治疗效果和治疗后家长满意度。采用SPSS 19.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: ART组的总体疗效优于对照组,ART组2~4岁的患儿合作程度显著优于对照组（P<0.05）,5岁患儿的合作程度稍好于对照组,但无显著差异（P>0.05）。治疗后3个月,ART组患牙继发龋率低于对照组,但无统计学意义（P>0.05）。治疗后6个月和12个月,ART组的继发龋率显著低于对照组（P<0.05）,ART组家长满意度显著高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论: 改良高强度玻璃离子ART更容易获得儿童和家长认可,治疗配合度高,操作简单,疗效可靠。

关键词: 高强度玻璃离子, 非创伤性修复, 儿童, 乳牙龋齿

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of improved atraumatic restorative treatment(ART) with high-strength glass ionomer cement in the treatment of primary caries in children. METHODS: From August 2018 to May 2019, 262 children with primary tooth caries who were treated in Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were selected into our study, prospectively. The children were divided into two groups, randomly: ART group (131 cases, 177 teeth) and control group (131 cases, 178 teeth). Children in the control group were treated with conventional cavity preparation and composite resin filling, while those in the ART group were treated with improved high-intensity glass ionomer. The curative effect and satisfaction degree were compared between the two groups. SPSS 19.0 software package was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The overall curative effect in the ART group was better than that of the control group. The cooperation degree of the 2~4 years old children in the ART group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). The cooperation degree of the 5 years old children between the two groups had no significant differences(P>0.05). Both groups of children accepted 12 months of follow-up. Three months after treatment, the rate of secondary caries in the ART group was significantly lower than that in the control group, but it was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Six and 12 months after treatment, the rate of secondary caries in the ART group were significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05), and the satisfaction of parents in the ART group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Improved ART with high-intensity glass ionomer cement is more likely accepted by children and their parents, with more willing to accept and cooperate with the treatment. Not only is it easy to operate, but also has a reliable curative effect in children.

Key words: High-strength glass ionomer cement, Atraumatic restorative treatment, Children, Deciduous caries

中图分类号:

R788.1

刘子晗, 马浩然, 苗芬, 周淑. 改良高强度玻璃离子ART技术治疗儿童乳牙龋齿疗效分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(3): 278-282.

LIU Zi-han, MA Hao-ran, MIAO Fen, ZHOU Shu. Analysis of the effect of improved ART with high-intensity glass ionomer cement in the treatment of primary caries in children[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2021, 30(3): 278-282.

参考文献

[1] 王兴. 第四次全国口腔健康流行病学调查报告[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2019: 2-4.
[2] 曾艺旋, 欧晓艳, 周小军, 等. 江西省3~5岁城乡儿童乳牙健康现状及口腔卫生行为分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(5): 564-569.
[3] 高玮, 韩蕊, 马雷, 等. 2018年青岛市学龄前儿童龋齿状况及其相关因素分析[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2019, 53(6): 611-613.
[4] 彭燕, 杜劲英, 许祥芹, 等. 南京地区部分3岁儿童乳牙龋及其家庭口腔保健情况浅析[J]. 口腔生物医学, 2019,10(3): 143-145.
[5] 祁军. 高强度玻璃离子无创伤修复技术用于小儿乳牙龋治疗中的临床效果[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2018, 5(17): 11-12.
[6] Mijan MC, Frencken JE,Schwass DR, et al.Microcomputed tomographyevaluation of dentine mineral concentration in primary molars managed by three treatment protocols[J]. Caries Res, 2018, 52(4): 303-311.
[7] Arrow P, Mcphee R, Atkinson D, et al.Minimally invasive dentistry based on atraumatic restorative treatment to manage early childhood caries in rural and remote aboriginal communities: protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. JMIR Res Protoc, 2018, 7(7): e10322.
[8] 林静, 姚华. 窝沟封闭术联合氟保护漆在预防5~8岁儿童龋齿中的效果评价[J].上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(4): 384-387.
[9] Panahandeh N, Torabzadeh H, Aghaee M, et al.Effect of incorporation of zinc oxide nanoparticles on mechanical properties of conventional glass ionomer cements[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2018, 21(2): 130-135.
[10] Ruff RR, Niederman R.Comparative effectiveness of school-based caries prevention: a prospective cohort study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2018, 18(1): 53-60.
[11] Mijan MC, Leal SC, Bronkhorst EM, et al.Are clinically successful amalgam and ART restorations in primary molars microgap free?[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2018, 20(1): 25-32.
[12] Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila L.Reinforcing effect of discontinuous microglass fibers on resin-modified glass ionomer cement[J]. Dent Mater J, 2018, 37(3): 484-492.
[13] Lagisetti AK, Hegde P, Hegde MN.Evaluation of bioceramics and zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer cement in repair of furcation perforations: an in vitro study[J]. J Conser Dent, 2018, 21(2): 184-189.
[14] 唐玉香, 武洁, 徐万田, 等. 酸蚀技术对乳牙玻璃离子窝沟封闭临床效果的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36(6): 646-649.
[15] 刘怡杰, 常青, 荣文笙, 等. 2种封闭剂防龋效果的5年观察[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2018, 53(7): 437-442.
[16] 邵旭媛, 潘在兴.非创伤性修复治疗技术应用于乳牙龋病治疗的临床效果评价[J].中国医药指南, 2018, 16(22):181-182.
[17] 汪伟佳, 张晓丹, 曹玉慧, 等. 7~9周岁第一恒磨牙窝沟封闭效果的分析[J].口腔医学, 2019, 39(3): 235-239,260.
[18] 王国英, 冯希平. 学龄前儿童使用含氟牙膏安全性的研究进展[J]. 广东牙病防治, 2009,17(2): 93-94.

改良高强度玻璃离子ART技术治疗儿童乳牙龋齿疗效分析

Analysis of the effect of improved ART with high-intensity glass ionomer cement in the treatment of primary caries in children

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周琼, 刘敏, 王霄, 陈薇. 母亲患龋风险对儿童龋易感性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 63-68.
[2]	马浩然, 刘子晗. 南京市860名1~6岁儿童口腔微生物与肠道菌群构成差异分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 270-273.
[3]	周勇, 周政权, 刘雪威, 张力木, 王也, 林晓萍. 儿童外周血微量营养素与4种口腔黏膜病的关系：217例临床分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 274-281.
[4]	郭靖晗, 於丽明, 李远远, 刘月华. 上颌扩弓联合双垫矫治器治疗对牙颌畸形口呼吸儿童上气道的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 634-638.
[5]	蔡文燕, 周淑, 林良缘. 三重抗生素糊剂对乳牙感染根管中微生物的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 374-378.
[6]	曾晓莉, 张颖, 王艳, 张皓, 江一巍, 笪东欣, 虞瑾, 王沪宁. 上海市残障儿童及家长口腔健康知、信、行调查分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 379-383.
[7]	李丽, 金昊, 盛恺, 季萍萍, 丁琴, 侯黎莉. 儿童口腔健康认知和行为对其口腔健康状况的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 406-409.
[8]	杨立, 冉幸, 李岩. 上海市普陀区小学教师儿童牙外伤知识知晓度抽样调查[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 435-438.
[9]	傅秀军, 王琛, 梁奕敏, 周仁鹏, 王丹茹. 双侧扩张肩胛皮瓣在儿童、青少年大面积颌颈部瘢痕修复中的应用：7例报道[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(3): 332-336.
[10]	张艺, 李静, 沈露, 王金华. 错畸形对重庆市8~10岁儿童自尊的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(2): 182-186.
[11]	陈琦雯, 袁爽, 施乐. 多维度口腔清洁干预模式对区域学龄前儿童防龋效果的评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(1): 66-70.
[12]	姚志涛, 安玮, 买买提吐逊·吐尔地. 保守治疗对儿童单侧髁突骨折患者颌骨对称性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(1): 77-80.
[13]	邹茵, 付巧梅, 徐贤寅. 儿童安氏Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类错牙合畸形患者舌体积、舌骨位置、气道容积及颌面部形态的关系[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(6): 632-637.
[14]	徐晓明, 刘月华, 李文井, 王璐, 于向华, 田应菊. 儿童口腔科普短剧健康教育对10岁儿童口腔保健知信行的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 304-307.
[15]	王沪宁, 王艳, 张皓, 毛艳敏, 董华, 华敏, 江一巍, 张颖. 上海市1296名3~5岁儿童龋病及其相关危险因素分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 174-178.