Shanghai Journal of Stomatology ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 230-235.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2023.03.002

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of surface treatment on the three-point bend bonding strength between pure titanium fabricated by selective laser melting and porcelain

HU Dan-dan, Ren Can-xia, LUO Xiao-ping   

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University. Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2022-02-28 Revised:2022-05-11 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-06-28

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of surface treatment on bonding strength between pure titanium formed by selective laser melting and porcelain. METHODS: Pure titanium strips (64) and cobalt-chromium alloy strips (16) were laser machined to meet ISO 9693 standards. The pure titanium specimens were divided into 4 groups according to the sandblasting pressure and interlayer material. The sandblasting pressure of 0.25 MPa of bonder porcelain group was TB1, the sandblasting pressure of 0.25 MPa of gold coating group was TG1, the sandblasting pressure of 0.45 MPa of bonder porcelain group was TB2, and the sandblasting pressure of 0.45 MPa of the gold coating group was TG2(n=16). After porcelain fusing, half of the specimens in each group were tested for three-point bend bonding strength, and the other half were tested after 10 000 cycles of thermal cycling(n=8). The bonding strength of cobalt-chromium alloy after sandblasting at 0.25 MPa and 0.45 MPa was taken as the control group and recorded as group C1, C2(n=8). The bonding strength was tested using classical three-point bending experiment. The surface roughness of pure titanium was measured by laser scanning confocal microscope(LSCM). Field emission scanning electron microscopy(FE-SEM) was used to observe the interface morphology of titanium-ceramic. The surface morphology of titanium after porcelain stripping was observed with stereomicroscope and fracture modes were analyzed by it. Graphpad Prism 8.0 software package was used for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: The bonding strength of group TG2 was (40.16±3.97) MPa and (37.38±2.39) MPa of group TG1, which were significantly higher than that of group TB2 (36.32±1.44) MPa and group TB1 (33.75±2.31) MPa (P<0.05). The bonding strength of group TB2 with 0.45 MPa sandblasting was significantly higher than that of group TB1 with 0.25 MPa sandblasting (P<0.05). There was no significant decrease in titanium-ceramic bonding strength before and after thermal cycling. When the sandblasting pressure increased from 0.25 MPa to 0.45 MPa, the roughness increased significantly (P<0.05). The fracture modes were mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, gold coating can significantly improve the bonding strength of Ti22 porcelain and SLM pure titanium than bonder porcelain, and increase of sandblasting pressure can further improve the bonding strength of titanium-porcelain. After 10 000 cycles of thermal cycling, the titanium-porcelain bonding strength did not decrease significantly.

Key words: Selective laser melting, Titanium, Cobalt chromium alloys, Gold coating, Bonding strength, Thermal cycling

CLC Number: