Shanghai Journal of Stomatology ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 225-229.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2023.03.001

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative study of two novel nickel-titanium instruments for root canal preparation in curved canals on shaping ability and microcrack formation

FENG Fei1,2, CAO Li-qun1,2, ZHANG Qi1   

  1. 1. Department of Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Stomatology, Tongji University, Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Dental Tissue Regeneration and Restoration. Shanghai 200072;
    2. Department of Dentistry and Endodontics, Shanghai Stomatology Hospital & School of Stomatology, Fudan University; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Craniomaxillofacial Development and Disease, Fudan University. Shanghai 200031, China
  • Received:2022-02-18 Revised:2022-05-11 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-06-28

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the shaping ability and microcrack formation of ProTaper Next (PTN) and XP-endo Shaper (XPS) systems in the mesial curved root canals of mandibular molars by using micro-CT scans. METHODS: Sixteen mandibular molars with two independent mesial root canals and curvature ranging from 25° to 35° were randomly divided into two groups. The preparation time was recorded. Pre-and-postoperative images were scanned by micro-CT. The following parameters were evaluated: canal transportation, centering ratio, changes in canal volume, canal/root width ratio and microcrack formation. SPSS 22.0 software package was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Significant difference (P <0.05) was found for canal transportation at the section of 1, 3, 5, 7 mm from the apical foramen and centering ratio at the section of 1, 3, 7 mm from the apical foramen, where XPS files were superior. There was no significant difference for centering ratio at the section of 5 mm from the apical foramen(P>0.05). XPS groups significantly consumed less time during the preparation(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the increase amount of volume, and canal/root width ratio(P>0.05). Both instruments did not induce new microcrack after preparation. CONCLUSIONS: PTN and XPS can both shape curved canals effectively and safely. XPS showed better centering ability and reduced preparation time during preparation.

Key words: New thermo-mechanical nickel-titanium instrument, Curved canal, Root canal preparation, Shaping ability, Microcrack

CLC Number: