Effect of various storage methods on shear bond strength of enamel of bovine teeth

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2023.02.006

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of various storage methods on shear bond strength of enamel of bovine teeth and find the storage condition that could preserve the similar bond strength as the freshly extracted teeth. METHODS: One hundred and thirty freshly extracted bovine teeth were divided into 13 groups. One was the reference group and 12 were the experimental group. Each group contained 10 teeth. Teeth in the reference group were operated on the same day as the teeth were extracted, while teeth in the experimental groups were stored in different methods (4% formaldehyde solution at 4 ℃, 23 ℃, 1% chloramine T at 4 ℃, 23 ℃, distilled water at 4 ℃, 23 ℃). After stored for 30 days and 90 days, the bovine teeth were taken out and then the shear bond strength was tested. The data were analyzed with SPSS 20.0 software package. RESULTS: The bovine teeth stored in 4% formaldehyde and 1% chloramine T at 23 ℃ and in distilled water at 4 ℃ achieved similar bond strength as freshly extracted teeth at 30 days and 90 days, and the bond strength did not change over time. The bovine teeth stored in 4% formaldehyde solution and 1% chloramine T at 4 ℃ at 30 days had higher shear bond strength than freshly extracted bovine teeth, but over time the bond strength reduced and reached the similar level at 90 days. The bovine teeth stored in distilled water at 23 ℃ obtained similar bond strength as freshly extracted teeth at 30 days but over time the bond strength reduced until 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Bovine teeth stored in 4% formaldehyde solution and 1% chloramine T at 23 ℃ and in distilled water at 4 ℃ achieved similar bond strength as freshly extracted teeth and does not change over time. These three methods are recommended for storing bovine teeth.

Key words: Bovine teeth, Enamel, Shear bond strength, Storage method

CLC Number:

R783.1

LI Li, TAN Jun-yan, CHEN Wen-bin, WANG Sun, WANG Yu-bo. Effect of various storage methods on shear bond strength of enamel of bovine teeth[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 32(2): 143-146.

References

[1] Attin T, Wegehaupt F, Gries D, et al.The potential of deciduous and permanent bovine enamel as substitute for deciduous and permanent human enamel: erosion-abrasion experiments[J]. J Dent, 2007, 35(10): 773-777.
[2] 楚金普, 周学东. 人牙与牛牙用于人工龋损实验的比较病理学观察[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2014, 34(3): 176-180.
[3] ISO TC 11405-2003, Dental materials-Guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure[S].
[4] Fonseca RB, Haiter-Neto F, Fernandes-Neto AJ, et al.Radiodensity of enamel and dentin of human, bovine and swine teeth[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2004, 49(11): 919-922.
[5] Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK.The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998, 114(5): 514-519.
[6] Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T.Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test[J]. J Dent Res, 1983, 62(10): 1076-1081.
[7] Anjum A, Otsuki M, Matin K, et al.Preservation in the liquid media produces alterations in enamel surface properties[J]. J Dent, 2009, 37(11): 884-890.
[8] Jameson MW, Tidmarsh BG, Hood JA.Effect of storage media on subsequent water loss and regain by human and bovine dentine and on mechanical properties of human dentine in vitro[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1994, 39(9): 759-767.
[9] Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, et al.The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1998, 43(4): 305-311.
[10] Da Silva EM, Glir DH, Gill AW, et al.Effect of chlorhexidine on dentin bond strength of two adhesive systems after storage in different media[J]. Braz Dent J, 2015, 26(6): 642-647.
[11] Ziskind D, Gleitman J, Rotstein I, et al.Evaluation of cetylpyridinium chloride for infection control in storage solution[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2003, 30(5): 477-481.
[12] Aquilino SA, Williams VD, Svare CW.The effect of storage solutions and mounting media on the bond strengths of a dentinal adhesive to dentin[J]. Dent Mater, 1987, 3(3): 131-135.
[13] DeWald JP. The use of extracted teeth for in vitro bonding studies: a review of infection control considerations[J]. Dent Mater, 1997, 13(2): 74-81.
[14] Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic[J]. J Dent Res, 1995, 74(9): 1591-1596.
[15] Cardoso PE, Braga RR, Carrilho MR.Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems[J]. Dent Mater, 1998, 14(6): 394-398.
[16] Triolo PT Jr, Swift EJ Jr.Shear bond strengths of ten dentin adhesive systems[J]. Dent Mater, 1992, 8(6): 370-374.
[17] Haller B, Hofmann N, Klaiber B, et al.Effect of storage media on microleakage of five dentin bonding agents[J]. Dent Mater, 1993, 9(3): 191-197.
[18] Söderholm KJ.Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: a report of the ASC MD156 task group on test methods for the adhesion of restorative materials[J]. Dent Mater, 1991, 7(2): 74-83.
[19] Raum K, Kempf K, Hein HJ, et al.Preservation of microelastic properties of dentin and tooth enamel in vitro-a scanning acoustic microscopy study[J]. Dent Mater, 2007, 23(10): 1221-1228.
[20] Al-Salehi SK, Wood DJ, Hatton PV.The effect of 24 h non-stop hydrogen peroxide concentration on bovine enamel and dentine mineral content and microhardness[J]. J Dent, 2007, 35(11): 845-850.