Effects of EMD on relapse and root repair after orthodontic tooth movement in rats

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2017.02.006

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To study the effect of enamel matrix derivative(EMD) on root repair and tooth movement relapse after orthodontic tooth movement in rats. METHODS: Twenty 10-weeks old male rats were divided into experimental and control group randomly (n=10). 100 g force was exerted to the left maxillary first molars for 14 days and then removed. EMD was injected in rats in the experimental group since appliance was removed. The control group received no injection. Micro-CT was taken to analyze the changes of root resorption volume and distance of tooth movement. The differences were analyzed by SPSS19.0 software package. RESULTS: Fourteen days after device removal, the repair volume of root resorption lacunae in the experimental group and the control group were (0.0295±0.0052)×107 μm3，(0.0189±0.0086)×107 μm3, respectively. The relapse distance and relapse percentage after tooth movement were (0.089±0.005) mm, (64.76±3.63)%, (0.127±0.010) mm and (92.28±1.90)%, respectively. Statistical analysis showed the repair volume of root resorption lacunae, the relapse distance and relapse percentage were statistically significant 14 days after device removal (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EMD can enhance the effect of root repair and decrease early relapse after orthodontic tooth movement in a certain extent.

Key words: Micro-CT, Enamel matrix derivative, Tooth movement, Root repair, Relapse

CLC Number:

R783.5

HU Qin, XU Xiao-lin, ZHOU Jian-ping, DAI Hong-wei. Effects of EMD on relapse and root repair after orthodontic tooth movement in rats[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2017, 26(2): 156-161.

References

[1] Owmann-Moll P, Kurol J. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment in high- and low-risk patients: analysis of allergy as a possible predisposing factor[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2000, 22(6): 657-663.
[2] Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. Part I: The basic science aspects [J]. Angle Orthod, 2002, 72(2): 175-179.
[3] Heijl L, Heden G, Svärdström G, et al. Enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1997, 24(9): 705-714.
[4] Harris DA, Jones AS, Darendeliler MA. Physical properties of root cementum: part 8.Volumetric analysis of root resorption craters after application of controlled intrusive light and heavy orthodontic forces: a microcomputed tomography scan study [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(5): 639-647.
[5] Vieira GM, Chaves SB, Ferreira VM, et al. The effect of simvastatin on relapse of tooth movement and bone mineral density in rats measured by a new method using microtomography[J]. Acta Cir Bras, 2015, 30(5): 319-327.
[6] King GJ, Fischlschweiger W. The effect of force magnitude on extractable bone resorptive activity and cemental cratering in orthodontic tooth movement[J]. J Dent Res, 1982, 61(6): 775-779.
[7] Ren Y, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. The rat as a model for orthodontic tooth movement a critical review and a proposed solution [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2004, 26(5): 483-490.
[8] Xu X, Zhou J, Yang F, et al. Using micro-computed tomography to evaluate the dynamics of orthodontically induced root resorption repair in a rat model[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(3): e0150135.
[9] Ru N, Liu SS, Zhuang L, et al. In-vivo microcomputed tomography evaluation of rat alveolar bone and root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement[J]. Angle Orthod, 2013, 83(3): 402-409.
[10] Nakano T, Hotokezaka H, Hashimoto M, et al. Effects of different types of tooth movement and force magnitudes on the amount of tooth movement and root resorption in rats [J]. Angle Orthod, 2014, 84(6): 1079-1085.
[11] Brudvik P, Rygh P. The repair of orthodontic root resorption: an ultrastructural study [J]. Eur J Orthod, 1995, 17(3): 189-198.
[12] Jager A, Kunert D, Friesen T, et al. Cellular and extracellular factors in early root resorption repair in the rat [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2008, 30(4): 336-345.
[13] Hakki SS, Berry JE, Somerman MJ. The effect of enamel matrix protein derivative on follicle cells in vitro [J]. J Periodontol, 2001, 72(5): 679-687.
[14] 王浈, 刘宏伟, 金岩, 等. 不同诱导条件对人牙囊细胞合成非胶原蛋白的影响 [J].中国现代医学杂志, 2005, 15(18): 2786-2788.
[15] Hammarstrom L, Heijl L, Gestrelius S. Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1997, 24(9 Pt 2): 669-677.
[16] Alhezaimi K, Al-Shalan T, O'Neill R, et al. Connective tissue-cementum regeneration: a new histologic regeneration following the use of enamel matrix derivative in dehiscence-type defects. A dog model [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2009, 29(4): 425-433.
[17] Gonzales C, Hotokezaka H, Darendeliler MA, et al. Repair of root resorption 2 to 16 weeks after the application of continuous forces on maxillary first molars in rats: a 2-and 3-dimensional quantitative evaluation [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(4): 477-485.
[18] Franzen TJ, Monjo M, Rubert M, et al. Expression of bone markers and micro-CT analysis of alveolar bone duringorthodontic relapse [J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2014, 17(4): 249-258.
[19] Franzen TJ, Brudvik P, Vandevska Radunovic V. Periodontal tissue reaction during orthodontic relapse in rat molars [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2013, 35(2): 152-159.
[20] Schwartz Z, Carnes DL Jr, Pulliam R, et al. Porcine fetal enamel matrix derivative stimulates proliferation but not differentiation of pre-osteoblastic 2T9 cells, inhibits proliferation and stimulates differentiation of osteoblast-like MG63 cells, and increases proliferation and differentiation of normal human osteoblast NHOst cells [J]. J Periodontol, 2000, 71(8): 1287-1296.
[21] Reseland JE, Reppe S, Larsen AM, et al. The effect of enamel matrix derivative on gene expression in osteoblasts [J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2006, 114 (Suppl 1): 205-211.
[22] 杜岩, 吴织芬, 万玲, 等. 釉基质蛋白对人牙周膜细胞合成骨桥蛋白、骨涎蛋白的影响 [J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2008, 14(3): 126-129.
[23] 邬春兰, 束蓉. 釉基质蛋白对成骨细胞矿化及黏附能力的影响 [J]. 上海口腔医学, 2002, 11(2): 135-137.