Shanghai Journal of Stomatology ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 435-438.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2022.04.019

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical effectiveness evaluation of gingival recession by using perioscope as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy

LU Wei-qing1, ZHANG Wei-liang1, XIANG Wen-jing1, LIU Bin-yi2, CAO Wei-yu3, YANG Yi-ming4   

  1. 1. Department of Periodontology, 2. Department of Preventive Dentistry, 3. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental and Ophthalmic Clinic of Putuo District. Shanghai 200060;
    4. Department of Orthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2022-02-28 Revised:2022-04-29 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-08-30

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of ultrasonic scaling and root planning(SRP) assisted by perioscope on gingival recession of maxillary lateral incisor. METHODS: Thirty-six outpatients with moderate to advanced chronic periodontitis from the Department of Periodontology at Dental and Ophthalmic Clinic of Putuo District from June 2020 to December 2020 were collected as research objects. Periodontal treatment was carried out according to a single-blind split-mouth self-control design randomly with(experimental group, namely perioscope group) or without(control group, namely SRP group) periodontal endoscope.The labial periodontal probing depth (PD), labial attachment loss (AL) and gingival recession(GR) in the maxillary lateral incisors were recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and compared among groups by SPSS 22.0 software package. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between perioscope group and SRP group at baseline. ΔGR (the recession extent of gum within two observation time) in perioscope group was significantly smaller than that in SRP group at 3 months(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in other periodontal indicators at 3 and 6 months between the 2 groups after treatment, but it can be found that the degree of PD reduction and AL improvement in perioscope group was more than those in SRP group, this trend was most obvious at 3 months. PD and AL were significantly different between baseline and 3 months or 6 months in the two groups. There were significant differences in ΔGR at 3 months and 6 months between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with routine SRP, the extent of root surface debridement with perioscope-assisted SRP is thorough and less invasive, and the reduction of gingival recession of labial surface of maxillary lateral incisor at 3 months is significantly less; thus, the aesthetic effect is prominent.

Key words: Periodontitis, Maxillary lateral incisor, Ultrasonic scaling, Root planning, Periodontal endoscope, Gingival recession

CLC Number: