Shanghai Journal of Stomatology ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 71-74.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2022.01.015

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Treatment of maxillary ameloblastoma with different modalities: a retrospective analysis of 92 cases

LUO Hao1,2, YUAN Zhuang1,2, WU Kai-liu3, HE Jie3, MENG Jian1,2   

  1. 1. School of Stomatology, Xuzhou Medical University. Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu Province;
    2. Department of Stomatology, Xuzhou Clinical College, Xuzhou Medical University. Xuzhou 221004, Jiangsu Province;
    3. Department of Oromaxillofacial Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2020-09-29 Revised:2020-11-26 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-03-10

Abstract: PURPOSE: To explore the appropriate surgical approach for each type of maxillary ameloblastoma. METHODS: The clinical data of 92 patients with maxillary ameloblastoma were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were pathologically diagnosed, followed up for 3-8 years after surgery, maxillofacial CT and panoramic images were taken regularly to observe the surgical outcomes. SPSS 22.0 software package was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The proportion of maxillary ameloblastoma in male and female patients was 3 to 1,with more male patients and the mean age was 45.77 years old. The total recurrence rate of 92 patients was 21.74%, among which unicystic ameloblastoma had no recurrence after different surgical procedures. Among 38 patients with typical maxillary ameloblastoma, 14 underwent curettage, 3 underwent decompression,16 underwent extended resection, 3 underwent subtotal maxillary resection, 1 underwent iliac bone transplantation after subtotal maxillary resection, and 1 underwent reconstruction with anterolateral thigh flap after subtotal maxillary resection. Among them, 18 had recurrence and 5 had canceration. Three patients with extrasseous/peripheral type underwent expanded resection and two underwent curettage,none of them had recurrence. One patient with metastasizing ameloblastoma recurred after extended resection. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary ameloblastoma with unicystic type should be completely removed with minimal trauma. The recurrence rate of maxillary ameloblastoma via simple curettage or extended resection is still relatively high, which may be due to the large tumor involvement scope of these patients and the failure of complete tumor removal by curettage. For external/peripheral ameloblastoma and metastatic ameloblastoma, the involved jaw bone should be removed as much as possible to prevent recurrence. For malignant transformation of ameloblastoma, the tumor and jaw bone should be dissected during the operation to reduce recurrence rate. The primary site, cervical lymph nodes and lungs should be closely followed after operation to detect early metastasis.

Key words: Maxilla, Ameloblastoma, Decompression, Curettage, Recurrence

CLC Number: