不同正畸托槽粘接剂及釉质抛光方法对牙釉质着色的影响

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.03.008

上海口腔医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 257-260.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2018.03.008

不同正畸托槽粘接剂及釉质抛光方法对牙釉质着色的影响

吴海苗¹，叶翠¹，陈栋²

1.上海市口腔病防治院口腔正畸科，
2.口腔内科，上海 200031

收稿日期:2017-12-18 修回日期:2018-01-30 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-20
通讯作者: 陈栋，E-mail：chendong19690124@126.com
作者简介:吴海苗(1975-)，女，硕士，副主任医师，E-mail：wuhaimiao0805@126.com

Comparative study of enamel discoloration related to bonding with different orthodontic adhesives and cleaning-up with different procedures

WU Hai-miao¹, YE Cui¹, CHEN Dong².

1.Department of Orthodontology；
2.Department of Oral Medicine, Shanghai Stomatological Disease Center. Shanghai 200031,China

Received:2017-12-18 Revised:2018-01-30 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的： 比较3种不同托槽粘接剂和4种不同釉质抛光方法对牙釉质颜色改变的影响。方法： 选取120颗正畸需要拔除的前磨牙，随机分为3组，分别使用3种不同正畸托槽粘接剂-化学固化树脂粘接剂、光固化树脂粘接剂和树脂改性玻璃离子粘接剂，每组再随机抽取10颗牙分为4组，分别选择4种不同釉质抛光方法去除粘接剂并抛光牙釉质：碳化钨车针（TC）、碳化钨车针+Sof-Lex抛光杯（TC+SL）、碳化钨车针+One Gloss抛光杯（TC+OG）和碳化钨车针+PoGo抛光杯（TC+PG）。将上述抛光后的牙在咖啡溶液中放置7 d后，用Crystaleye分光光度比色仪进行釉质着色变化值测量。采用SPSS13.0软件包对数据进行双因素方差分析和Bonferroni法分析。结果： 不同抛光方法的组内差异表现为TC组釉质表面颜色变化差异最大，TC+SL组变化值最低，TC+SL和TC+PG组变化值无显著差异（P> 0.05）。不同粘接剂的组间差异表现为树脂改性玻璃离子粘接剂组样本着色变化值最低，化学固化树脂组样本着色变化值最高（P<0.05）。结论： 不同粘接剂类型和釉质抛光方法对釉质表面的着色变化有显著影响。

关键词: 釉质抛光, 牙颜色, PoGo, Sof-Lex, 分光光度比色仪

Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare if there was any difference in the enamel discoloration after staining when three orthodontic adhesives and 4 enamel clean-up methods were tested. METHODS: Three types of orthodontic adhesives were used: chemically cured resin, light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. A total of 120 human extracted premolars were included. Ten teeth of each orthodontic adhesive were randomly cleaned-up with 1 of 4 different procedures and stained in coffee for 7 days: carbide bur (TC), carbide bur and Sof-Lex polishers (TC+SL), carbide bur and One Gloss polishers (TC+OG), carbide bur and PoGo polishers (TC+PG). Colour measurements were made with Crystaleye dental spectrophotometer at baseline and after storage in a coffee solution for 1 week. Two way ANOVA and Bonferroni test were used for statistical analysis with SPSS 13.0 software package. RESULTS: The colour change values of adhesive materials in the TC group were the greatest. The lowest ΔE* values were obtained from the TC+SL group. However, there was no significant difference between the TC+SL and TC+PG group (P>0.05). The resin-modified glass-ionomer cement group showed the lowest colour differences and chemically cured resin group showed the highest ΔE* values among all orthodontic adhesives (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The colour change of enamel surface is affected by the type of adhesive materials and clean-up procedures.

Key words: Clean-up procedures, Tooth colour, PoGo, Sof-Lex discs, Spectrophotometer

中图分类号:

R783.5

吴海苗，叶翠，陈栋. 不同正畸托槽粘接剂及釉质抛光方法对牙釉质着色的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(3): 257-260.

WU Hai-miao, YE Cui, CHEN Dong.. Comparative study of enamel discoloration related to bonding with different orthodontic adhesives and cleaning-up with different procedures[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(3): 257-260.

参考文献

[1] Havens DC, McNamara JA Jr, Sigler LM, et al. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics [J]. Angle Orthod,2010, 80(2): 322-328.
[2] Karamouzos A, Athanasiou AE, Papadopoulos MA, et al. Tooth-color assessment after orthodontic treatment: a prospective clinical trial [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 138(5): 537.e1-e8.
[3] Eliades T, Kakaboura A, Eliades G, et al. Comparison of enamel colour changes associated with orthodontic bonding using two different adhesives [J]. Eur J Orthod,2001, 23(1): 85-90.
[4] Eliades T, Gioka C, Heim M, et al. Color stability of orthodontic adhesive resins [J]. Angle Orthod,2004, 74(3): 391-393.
[5] Faltermeier A, Rosentritt M, Reicheneder C, et al. Discolouration of orthodontic adhesives caused by food dyes and ultraviolet light [J]. Eur J Orthod,2008, 30(1): 89-93.
[6] Pont HB, ?zcan M, Bagis B, et al. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: An in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2010, 138(4): 387.e1-e9.
[7] Ryf S, Flury S, Palaniappan S, et al. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various cleanup procedures in vitro [J]. Eur J Orthod,2012, 34(1): 25-32.
[8] ?zer T, Basaran G, Kama JD. Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(3): 368-374.
[9] Marchi RD, Marchi LMD, Terada RSS, et al. Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding [J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2012, 17(6) : 130-136.
[10] Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, et al. Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finishing and polishing [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent,2011, 23(1): 34-43.
[11] Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. Colourimetry, official recommendations of the International Commission on Illumination [M]. Paris: CIE, 1971.
[12] Odaira C, Itoh S, Ishibashi K. Clinical evaluation of a dental color analysis system: the crystaleye spectrophotometer?[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2011, 55(4): 199-205.
[13] Ren YF, Feng L, Serban D, et al. Effects of common beverage colorants on color stability of dental composite resins: the utility of a thermocycling stain challenge model in vitro[J]. J Dent, 2012, 40(Suppl 1): e48-51.
[14] Sukontapatipark W, el-Agroudi MA, Selliseth NJ, et al. Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study [J]. Eur J Orthod,2001, 23(5): 475-484.
[15] St-Georges AJ, Bolla M, Fortin D, et al. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems [J]. Oper Dent,2005, 30(5): 593-597.
[16] Tate WH, Powers JM. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers [J]. Oper Dent,1996, 21(2): 53-58.
[17] Schulze KA, Marshall SJ, Gansky SA, et al. Color stability and hardness in dental composites after accelerated aging[J]. Dent Mater, 2003, 19(7): 612-619.
[18] Fontes ST, Fernandez MR, de Moura CM, et al. Color stability of a nanofill composite: effect of different immersion media [J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2009, 17(5): 388-391.
[19] Mundim FM, Garcia Lda F, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites [J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2010, 18(3): 249-254.
[20] Jung M, Eichelberger K, Klimek J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing [J]. Oper Dent, 2007, 32(4): 347-355.
[21] Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, Aladag A. Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems [J]. Oper Dent,2008, 33(4): 413-420.
[22] Türkün LS, Türkün M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials [J]. Oper Dent, 2004, 29(2): 203-211.

不同正畸托槽粘接剂及釉质抛光方法对牙釉质着色的影响

Comparative study of enamel discoloration related to bonding with different orthodontic adhesives and cleaning-up with different procedures

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	兰旭, 黄迪, 杨帆. 赣州市初中生牙颌畸形及家长矫治意识调查分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 266-270.
[2]	沈刚. 口腔正畸理论更新与技术研发的几点思考[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 113-119.
[3]	苏晓霞, 周力, 廖立, 李玥燕, 李小兵. 动态微笑美学模拟教学法在口腔正畸教学中的应用评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 220-224.
[4]	郭晶晶, 汤屹群, 何宏, 徐震. 3种根管充填方法在慢性根尖周炎根管治疗中的短期疗效观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 544-549.
[5]	黄纯, 温馨, 黄乐, 赵宁. 上颌前方牵引对恒牙早期骨性Ⅲ类错上、下颌骨宽度影响的三维模拟分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 550-555.
[6]	赵佳媛, 胡成思, 金玉, 张灵玲, 易芳, 陈君捷, 周娉, 卢燕勤, 李成日. 无托槽隐形矫治器伸长后牙效率的三维重叠分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 556-560.
[7]	周明智, 王林, 王亮, 吴可, 秦燕军, 赵春洋. 青少年安氏Ⅱ²类错畸形矫治后下颌骨的变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 389-394.
[8]	王雪纯, 汪涌, 许晓波, 郝新河. 数字化冠延长导板在前牙美学修复中的应用效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 260-264.
[9]	谢勤, 林珊, 林立, 李多. 青少年正畸上颌切牙不同内收方式对牙槽骨形态的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 290-294.
[10]	刘维佳, 唐镇, 张琦, 姜莉萍. 低能量微波照射对大鼠正畸牙移动及牙周组织改建的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 156-161.
[11]	徐子卿, 王特, 蒋健羽, 沈刚. 个性化舌侧上颌前牙滑动内收三维有限元构建与分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 162-166.
[12]	马晓晴, 项飞, 樊明月, 宋怡, 王晓慧, 张玲, 钱文昊. 微种植钉辅助无托槽隐形矫治器控制“过山车”效应的疗效分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 193-197.
[13]	林怡君, 鄢洁雅, 王天鸽, 周志捷, 廖盛轩, 毛丽霞, 刘加强. 减数正畸治疗中中切牙牙根及牙槽骨形态变化的锥形束CT测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 211-216.
[14]	刘帆, 刘琳, 王艳红. Insignia固定矫治器定制系统在正畸治疗中的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 96-99.
[15]	房兵, 金作林, 白玉兴, 王林, 赵志河, 李巍然, 白丁, 贺红, 刘月华, 胡敏, 宋锦璘, 陈莉莉, 曹阳, 吴亭熹, 厉松, 李煌, 施洁珺, 唐国华, 储沨婷. 儿童和青少年早期错畸形诊治策略的专家共识[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 449-455.