数字化技术用于25例患者正颌手术效果评价

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2021.02.022

上海口腔医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 219-224.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2021.02.022

• 临床总结 • 上一篇

数字化技术用于25例患者正颌手术效果评价

李莉^1,2, 孙健^1,2,3, 李亚莉¹, 陈立强^1,2, 陈晨^1,2, 王硕¹, 王志浩^1,2, 孟坤^1,2, 孙鸣^1,2, 张秀秀^1,2

1.青岛大学附属医院口腔颌面外科,山东青岛 266000;
2.青岛大学口腔医学院,山东青岛 266000;
3.青岛市口腔数字医学与3D打印工程实验室,山东青岛 266000

收稿日期:2019-09-05 修回日期:2020-01-10 出版日期:2021-04-25 发布日期:2021-05-11
通讯作者: 孙健,E-mail：sunjianqy@126.com
作者简介:李莉（1993-）,女,硕士,住院医师,E-mail: 939256892@qq.com
基金资助:
山东省科技发展计划项目（2014GSF118108）

Evaluation of digital technology for orthognathic surgery in 25 patients

LI Li^1,2, SUN Jian^1,2,3, LI Ya-li¹, CHEN Li-qiang^1,2, CHEN Chen^1,2, WANG Shuo¹, WANG Zhi-hao^1,2, MENG Kun^1,2, SUN Ming^1,2, ZHANG Xiu-xiu^1,2

1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital. Qingdao 266000;
2. School of Stomatology of Qingdao University. Qingdao 266000;
3. Oral Digital Medicine and 3-Dimensional Printing Engineering Laboratory. Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China

Received:2019-09-05 Revised:2020-01-10 Online:2021-04-25 Published:2021-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:应用数字化技术辅助正颌外科三维重建测量、术前诊断、手术设计与模拟、导板制作、导航验证和效果评估,探索制订更加科学、合理的数字化诊治方法和流程。方法:选取25例先天性牙颌面畸形患者,术前行颅颌面CT扫描,将CT数据导入Mimics 20.0软件,建立数字化原始模型。确定三维重建测量硬组织标志点并进行测量、分析、诊断、手术方案设计和导板制作。术中采用手术导航系统,进行上颌骨设计位置的确认、固位验证和骨打磨精确导引。术后1周复查颅颌面CT,并进行设计方案的术后验证。采用SPSS 24.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:25例患者均按照数字化正颌外科设计及流程完成手术,术后效果达到术前设计方案的要求。术后实际数字化三维重建头模与术前预测头模相比,10个骨性标志点在X、Y、Z三维方向上均无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论:采用数字化技术辅助正颌外科诊断、手术设计和实施具有精准、微创的优越性。

关键词: 数字化技术, 正颌手术, 手术导航

Abstract: PURPOSE: To use three-dimensional reconstruction measurement, preoperative diagnosis, surgical design, surgical simulation, guide plate production, navigation verification and effect evaluation of orthognathic surgery assisted by digital technology, in order to explore more scientific and reasonable programs and procedures of orthognathic surgery. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with congenital dental and maxillofacial deformity were selected as the experimental subjects, craniofacial spiral CT was conducted before surgery and CT data were imported into Mimics 20.0 software to establish a 3D head digital model. The bone landmarks in three-dimensional reconstruction digital model were selected, measured, analyzed and diagnosed, and the design of the surgical plan and the production of the guide plates were performed. Surgical navigation system was used to confirm the maxillary position, verify the bone retention and guide precise bone grinding during operation. Craniofacial spiral CT was conducted 1 week after surgery for postoperative validation of the surgical design protocol. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 24.0 software package. RESULTS: All 25 patients were operated according to the digital orthognathic surgery design and procedure.There were no significant differences in X, Y and Z three-dimensional directions in 10 actual landmarks between the postoperative actual head model and the preoperative predictive head model（P>0.05）. CONCLUSIONS: Orthognathic surgery assisted by digital technology has the advantages of precision and minimal invasiveness.

Key words: Digital technology, Orthognathic surgery, Surgical navigation technique

中图分类号:

R782.2

李莉, 孙健, 李亚莉, 陈立强, 陈晨, 王硕, 王志浩, 孟坤, 孙鸣, 张秀秀. 数字化技术用于25例患者正颌手术效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(2): 219-224.

LI Li, SUN Jian, LI Ya-li, CHEN Li-qiang, CHEN Chen, WANG Shuo, WANG Zhi-hao, MENG Kun, SUN Ming, ZHANG Xiu-xiu. Evaluation of digital technology for orthognathic surgery in 25 patients[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2021, 30(2): 219-224.

参考文献

[1] 沈国芳. 数字化技术与正颌外科[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志 2014, 7(6): 324-328.
[2] Bengtsson M, Wall G, Larsson P, et al.Treatment outcomes and patient-reported quality of life after orthognathic surgery with computer-assisted 2- or 3-dimensional planning: a randomized double-blind active-controlled clinical trial[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018, 153(6): 786-796.
[3] Wilde F, Schramm A.Computer-aided reconstruction of the facial skeleton: planning and implementation in clinical routine[J]. HNO, 2016, 64(9): 641-649.
[4] Stokbro K, Aagaard E, Torkov P, et al.Surgical accuracy of three-dimensional virtual planning: a pilot study of bimaxillary orthognathic procedures including maxillary segmentation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 45(1): 8-18.
[5] 窦庚, 张宇, 田磊. 外科导航技术在治疗茎突综合征中的应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016, 14(3): 244-248.
[6] Hatamleh M, Turner C, Bhamrah G, et al.Improved virtual planning for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2016, 27(6): e568-e573.
[7] Lin HH, Lonic D, Lo LJ.3D printing in orthognathic surgery - A literature review[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2018, 117(7): 547-558.
[8] Badiali G, Roncari A, Bianchi A, et al.Navigation in orthognathic surgery: 3D accuracy[J]. Facial Plast Surg, 2015, 31(5): 463-473.
[9] Almukhtar A, Khambay B, Ayoub A, et al."Direct DICOM Slice Landmarking" a novel research technique to quantify skeletal changes in orthognathic surgery[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(8): e0131540.
[10] Hanafy M, Akoush Y, Abou-ElFetouh A, et al. Precision of orthognathic digital plan transfer using patient-specific cutting guides and osteosynthesis versus mixed analogue-digitally planned surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2020,49(1): 62-68.
[11] 李明哲, 王晓霞, 李自力, 等. 计算机导航辅助下口内入路髁突切除术精确性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 182-186.
[12] 代杰文, 王璧霞, 魏弘朴, 等. 数字化正颌外科流程及临床效果回顾性分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2016, 36(9): 1333-1340.
[13] Zaragoza-Siqueiros J, Medellin-Castillo HI, de la Garza-Camargo H, et al. An integrated haptic-enabled virtual reality system for orthognathic surgery planning[J]. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2019, 22(5): 499-517.
[14] Wu BW, Kaban LB, Peacock ZS.Correlation of cephalometric analyses with clinical impression in orthognathic surgery patients: harvold and steiner analyses[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 77(11): 2308-2317.
[15] Dobai A, Markella Z, Vízkelety T, et al.Planning options of reconstructive and orthognathic operation by means of three-dimensional imaging[J].Orv Hetil, 2018, 159(39): 1584-1592.
[16] Wang RH, Ho CT, Lin HH, et al.Three-dimensional cephalometry for orthognathic planning: Normative data and analyses[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2020, 119(1 Pt 2): 191-203.
[17] Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, et al.Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 2: three-dimensional cephalometry[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 44(12): 1441-1450.
[18] Bouletreau P, Makaremi M, Ibrahim B, et al.Artificial intelligence: applications in orthognathic surgery[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 120(4): 347-354,.
[19] 杨一鸣, 陈林玲, 张哲谌, 等. 骨性Ⅲ类错患者后退接触位的头影测量分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(12): 1247-1250.
[20] Nilsson J, Richards RG, Thor A, et al.Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: in vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2016, 44(9): 1194-1200.
[21] 吴雨桐, 孙健, 李亚莉, 等. 骨性Ⅲ类错正颌手术前、后面部软、硬组织变化比率的三维研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(2): 158-164.
[22] Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, et al.Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 40(4): 341-352.
[23] Kim JH, Park YC, Yu HS, et al. Accuracy of 3-dimensional virtual surgical simulation combined with digital teeth alignment: apilot study [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 75(11): 2441.e1-2441.e13.
[24] Ho CT, Lin HH, Lo LJ.Intraoral scanning and setting up the digital final occlusion in three-dimensional planning of orthog nathic surgery: its comparison with the dental model approach[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 143(5): 1027e-1036e.
[25] Landaeta-Quinones CG, Hernandez N, Zarroug NK.Computer-assisted surgery: applications in dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2018, 62(3): 403-420.
[26] Lin HH, Chang HW, Wang CH, et al.Three-dimensional computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: experience of 37 patients[J]. Ann Plast Surg,2015, 74(Suppl 2): S118-126.
[27] Lartizien R, Zaccaria I, Noyelles L, et al.Quantification of the inaccuracy of conventional articulator model surgery in Le Fort Ⅰosteotomy: evaluation of 30 patients controlled by the Orthopilot® navigation system[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 57(7): 672-677.

数字化技术用于25例患者正颌手术效果评价

Evaluation of digital technology for orthognathic surgery in 25 patients

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蒋珏, 林宇, 蒋超. 右美托咪定与艾司洛尔用于正颌手术术中控制性降压效果比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 548-550.
[2]	聂萍，陶丽，朱妍菲，孙蕙珺，朱敏. 2种不同正颌术式对骨性Ⅲ类错畸形患者上气道形态的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(3): 280-284.
[3]	沈刚. 科学审视透明牙套与舌侧矫治技术—回顾与展望[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(2): 113-116.
[4]	顾鑫宇, 张静露, 吕冬, 陈文静. 骨性Ⅲ类错正畸-正颌联合治疗前后温度感觉功能的定量评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(5): 583-587.
[5]	应王君子, 沈舜尧, 李彪, 孙昊, 张天嘉, 王旭东. 唇腭裂患者正颌术后上颌骨短期稳定性的三维分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(3): 345-351.
[6]	李星儒,陈立强,李亚莉,孙健. 正颌手术对患者心身症状的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(1): 107-110.
[7]	胥杨, 韩向龙, 白丁. 骨性Ⅱ类高角错颌正畸治疗探讨[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(4): 508-512.