腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干的影响

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2020.04.012

上海口腔医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 396-399.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2020.04.012

腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干的影响

齐鑫¹, 谢敬生¹, 王梓欣²

1.庆阳市人民医院口腔科,甘肃庆阳 745000;
2.甘肃省妇幼保健院,甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2019-10-25 修回日期:2019-12-23 出版日期:2020-08-25 发布日期:2020-09-11
通讯作者: 齐鑫,E-mail：wex241933@163.com
作者简介:齐鑫（1984-）,男,本科,主治医师
基金资助:
甘肃省自然科学基金 (15RJZA076)

Effect of parotid sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy on salivary composition, flow and dry mouth prevention

QI Xin¹, XIE Jing-sheng¹, WANG Zi-xin²

1. Department of Stomatology, Qingyang People's Hospital. Qingyang 745000;
2. Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital. Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China

Received:2019-10-25 Revised:2019-12-23 Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-09-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：探讨头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者经腮腺保留式调强放疗后唾液组成、流量及口干的变化。方法：收集2016年5月—2018年11月庆阳市人民医院进行放疗的头颈部鳞癌患者101例,按照治疗方法分为调强放疗组（54例）与常规放疗组（47例）,比较2组患者临床病理特征参数,治疗前、后腮腺摄取指数,治疗后唾液成分、口干、口咽反应症状与分度。采用SPSS 20.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果：2组患者肿瘤部位、TNM临床分期与分化程度无显著差异（P>0.05）;治疗后调强放疗组患者唾液中总蛋白,分泌型IgA,钙、磷浓度显著大于常规放疗组（P<0.05）;治疗后2组患者腮腺摄取指数、分泌指数与唾液流速较治疗前显著下降（P<0.05）;且调强放疗组患者腮腺摄取指数、分泌指数与唾液流速显著大于常规放疗组（P<0.05）;调强放疗组治疗后口干情况显著优于常规放疗组（P<0.05）;治疗后调强放射组出现咽痛与咽下困难患者比例显著低于常规放疗组（P<0.05）;调强放疗组患者治疗后口咽分度情况显著优于常规放疗组（P<0.05）。结论：腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干情况影响较小,对腮腺分泌功能有显著保护作用。

关键词: 头颈部, 鳞状细胞癌, 调强放疗, 腮腺, 唾液, 口干症

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the changes of salivary composition, flow and dry mouth in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after parotid sparing modulated radiation therapy. METHODS: One hundred and one patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who received radiotherapy in Qingyang People's Hospital from May 2016 to November 2018 were selected and divided into intensity modulated radiation group(n=54) and conventional radiation group(n=47) according to different treatment methods. The clinicopathological parameters, parotid uptake index, salivary composition, dry mouth, oropharyngeal symptoms and grading were compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed with SPSS 20.0 software package. RESULTS: The tumor site, TNM stage and differentiation had no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). The concentration of total protein, secretory IgA, calcium and phosphorus in saliva of patients in intensity modulated radiation therapy group were significantly higher than those in conventional radiation group(P<0.05). The parotid uptake index, secretion index and salivary flow velocity were significantly decreased in both groups(P<0.05), and were significantly lower in the conventional radiation group than in the intensity modulated radiation group(P<0.05). Dry mouth condition in intensity modulated radiation group was significantly better than that in conventional radiation group(P<0.05). After treatment, the ratio of pharyngalgia and dysphagia patients in the intensity modulated radiation group was significantly lower than that in the conventional radiation group(P<0.05). The degree of oropharyngeal grading in the intensity modulated radiation therapy group was significantly better than that in the conventional radiation group(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The application of parotid sparing retention modulated radiation therapy has little effect on salivary composition, flow rate and dry mouth, and has obvious protective effect on parotid secretion.

Key words: Head and neck, Squamous cell carcinoma, Intensity modulated radiation therapy, Parotid gland, Saliva, Dry mouth

中图分类号:

R739.8

齐鑫, 谢敬生, 王梓欣. 腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(4): 396-399.

QI Xin, XIE Jing-sheng, WANG Zi-xin. Effect of parotid sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy on salivary composition, flow and dry mouth prevention[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2020, 29(4): 396-399.

参考文献

[1] Jöhrens K, Anagnostopoulos I, Dommerich S, et al.Expression patterns of CD168 correlate with the stage and grade of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck[J]. Mol Clin Oncol, 2017, 6(4): 597-602.
[2] 崔卫娜, 王宝山. ceRNA在头颈部肿瘤中的研究进展[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 32(8): 634-638.
[3] Wichmann G, Cedra S, Schlegel D, et al.Cilengitide and cetuximab reduce cytokine production and colony formation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells ex vivo[J]. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(2): 521-527.
[4] 邸斌, 李晓明, 张建军, 等. 头颈部鳞状细胞癌术后放疗控制颈部淋巴结转移的临床病理学影响因素分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(7): 485-490.
[5] Charalambous A.Seeking optimal management for radioactive iodine therapy-induced adverse effects[J]. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs, 2017, 4(4): 319-322.
[6] 王澎, 孟召伟, 谭建, 等维生素E对术后首次行131I治疗的分化型甲状腺癌患者唾液腺功能的保护作用[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2016, 36(5): 398-401.
[7] Rudat V, Nour A, Hammoud M, et al.Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer: analysis of interfractional errors and acute toxicity[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2015, 192(2): 109-117.
[8] 王玉斌, 林玉成, 王建化, 等. 勾画颌下腺在鼻咽癌三维调强适形放疗中对患者放疗后口干和生活质量的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(12): 46-49,63.
[9] 潘洛, 杨光伟, 周怀理. 溶菌酶含片预防放射性口咽反应的临床疗效观察[J]. 肿瘤药学, 2014, 4(4): 294-297.
[10] Eliçin O, Nisa L, Dal Pra A, et al.Up-front neck dissection followed by definitive (chemo)-radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: rationale, complications, toxicity rates, and oncological outcomes - A systematic review[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2016, 119(2): 185-193.
[11] 杨静, 孙聚葆, 詹浩辉. 腮腺单发肿块的MRI诊断[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2016, 24(3): 170-174.
[12] 胡彩容, 程燕铭, 张秀春, 等. 调强放疗对保护鼻咽癌患者吞咽结构的剂量学研究[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2016, 25(4): 309-313.
[13] Maske TT, van de Sande FH, Arthur RA, et al. In vitro biofilm models to study dental caries: a systematic review[J]. Biofouling, 2017, 33(8): 661-675.
[14] Katirci G, Ermis RB.Microindentation hardness and calcium/phosphorus ratio of dentin following excavation of dental caries lesions with different techniques[J]. Springerplus, 2016, 5(1):1641.
[15] 王晓丽, 杨柳青, 张遵, 等. 糖皮质激素与龋病相关性的研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(3): 397-401.
[16] 田甜, 韦智晓, 李俊红, 等.腮腺⁹⁹Tc^mO-₄摄取指数和残留比诊断干燥综合征的价值[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2016, 36(6): 521-524.
[17] 邹惠峰, 沈阳, 尤嘉熙, 等. 唾液腺显像诊断干燥综合征[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2017, 33(3): 399-403.
[18] Dane A, Gurbuz T.Clinical comparative study of the effects of helicobacter pylori colonization on oral health in children[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2016, 32(4): 969-973.
[19] 王志祥, 石彧, 冯献斌, 等.中医凉血生津法防治鼻咽癌放疗后口腔黏膜损伤疗效观察[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2016, 25(33): 3691-3693.

腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干的影响

Effect of parotid sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy on salivary composition, flow and dry mouth prevention

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱文静, 余强, 陶晓峰, 王韶颖, 田涛, 张春叶. 43例小唾液腺癌在多形性腺瘤中的影像学表现[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 255-260.
[2]	王力, 徐睿. 母亲口腔状况对新生儿口腔菌群的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 318-322.
[3]	白晗, 刘涵, 朱蕾, 刘超, 李楠, 肖晶. POLQ表达降低对SACC-83细胞DNA损伤敏感性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 120-125.
[4]	朱江, 许腾, 宋冬惠, 吴森斌. 口腔鳞状细胞癌组织中RACK1与M2/M1联合检测与预后的相关性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 517-522.
[5]	杜洪亮, 何等旗, 王佳俐, 车银富, 闫庆涵. 姜黄素调控唾液腺肿瘤细胞增殖和凋亡的机制探讨[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 483-490.
[6]	姚清婷, 吴言辉, 刘少华, 许辉, 李军, 石亮. 电离辐射对大鼠腮腺旁细胞分泌途径损伤及紧密连接蛋白claudin-4的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 359-366.
[7]	吕欢, 熊屏, 张蔚蒨, 龚霞, 李佳, 丁昂昂. 多模态超声对唾液腺肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 384-388.
[8]	肖华, 陶晓峰, 朱文静, 陈倩倩. 19例腮腺腺泡细胞癌的MRI影像表现分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 322-326.
[9]	夏佳琳, 曾奕玮, 赵小妹, 侯黎莉. 心理干预对头颈部恶性肿瘤患者负性情绪及生活质量影响的meta分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 330-336.
[10]	陈祺, 谢非, 季颖颖, 魏魁杰, 任强. LLY-283靶向PRMT5抑制头颈部鳞癌增殖和转移的实验研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 142-147.
[11]	陈娟, 曹若妍, 刘洋, 洪鹏宇, 唐瞻贵. TNFAIP6在口腔疣状癌与口腔鳞状细胞癌中的表达及其与临床病理的关系[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 167-172.
[12]	王守鹏, 丁紫雪, 孟箭, 李梦, 李晓东, 袁壮. HIST1H2BH在头颈部鳞状细胞癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 599-605.
[13]	林阳, 蒋位财, 邱宇, 高炳菊, 李军, 陈鹏, 林李嵩. 基于SEER数据库的颊黏膜鳞状细胞癌的预后列线图构建[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 644-648.
[14]	徐万林, 朱云, 卢浩, 丁继平, 姚原, 刘胜文, 张陈平, 杨雯君. 腮腺区广泛型复发性多形性腺瘤的面神经处理及术后放疗经验：附10例报告[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 667-672.
[15]	高洁, 姜雅萍, 马康傑, 赵保东, 邓婧. PRRX1对唾液腺腺样囊性癌细胞自噬的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 477-480.