In vitro study of apical negative pressure irrigation on apical extrusion and E. faecalis elimination

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2019.02.009

Shanghai Journal of Stomatology ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 601-604.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2019.02.009

• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles

In vitro study of apical negative pressure irrigation on apical extrusion and E. faecalis elimination

LU Jia-ping¹, HUANG Zheng-wei¹, QIAN Wen-hao²

1.Department of Endodontics, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011;
2.Department of Stomatology, Shanghai Xuhui District Dental Center. Shanghai 200030, China

Received:2018-12-14 Online:2019-12-25 Published:2020-01-14

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the efficiency of negative pressure irrigation and conventional syringe irrigation and evaluate the possibility as a new way of irrigation. METHODS: In vitro silicone socket model was used to simulate the resistance of apical flow by apical surrounding tissues. The in vitro efficacy on apical extrusion and E.faecalis elimination between negative pressure irrigation and conventional syringe irrigation was compared. SPSS 17.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Negative pressure irrigation extruded less (P<0.05), and was more effective in E.faecalis elimination(P<0.05) than conventional syringe. CONCLUSIONS: Negative pressure irrigation is a promising irrigation technique during root canal therapy.

Key words: Apical negative pressure irrigation, Conventional syringe irrigation, Apical extrusion, E.faecalis

CLC Number:

R781.3

LU Jia-ping, HUANG Zheng-wei, QIAN Wen-hao. In vitro study of apical negative pressure irrigation on apical extrusion and E. faecalis elimination[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 28(6): 601-604.

References

[1] Paqué F, Balmer M, Attin T, et al.Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(4): 703-707.
[2] Dutner J, Mines P, Anderson A.Irrigation trends among American Association of Endodontists members: a web-based survey[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(1): 37-40.
[3] Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ.Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positivepressure irrigant delivery[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(4): 745-750.
[4] Hülsmann M, Rodig T.Problems in disinfection of the root canal system [C]// Hülsmann M, Schafer E. Problems in endodontics: etiology, diagnosis and treatment [M]. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing, 2009: 253-292.
[5] Boutsioukis C, Psimma Z, van der Sluis LW. Factors affecting irrigant extrusion during root canal irrigation: a systematic review[J]. Int Endod J, 2013, 46(7): 599-618.
[6] Shin SJ, Kim HK, Jung IY, et al.Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of a new apical negative pressure irrigating system with conventional irrigation needles in the root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 109(3): 479-484.
[7] Mitchell RP, Yang SE, Baumgartner JC.Comparison of apical extrusion of NaOCl using the EndoVac or needle irrigation of root canals[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(2): 338-341.
[8] Desai P, Himel V.Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems[J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(4): 545-549.
[9] Bradford CE, Eleazer PD, Downs KE, et al.Apical pressures developed by needles for canal irrigation[J]. J Endod, 2002, 28(4): 333-335.
[10] Hockett JL, Dommisch JK, Johnson JD, et al.Antimicrobial efficacy of two irrigation techniques in tapered and nontapered canal preparations: an in vitro study[J]. J Endod, 2008, 34(11): 1374-1377.
[11] Cohenca N, Heilborn C, Johnson JD, et al.Apical negative pressure irrigation versus conventional irrigation plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing on root canal disinfection in dog teeth[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 109(1): e42-46.
[12] Cohenca N, Paranjpe A, Heilborn C, et al.Antimicrobial efficacy of two irrigation techniques in tapered and nontapered canal preparations. A randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Quintessence Int, 2013, 44(3): 2017-2028.
[13] Schoeffel GJ.The EndoVac method of endodontic irrigation: safety first[J]. Dent Today, 2007, 26(10): 92-94, 96.
[14] Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuandra K.In vitro efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(4): 445-448.
[15] Pawar R, Alqaied A, Safavi K.Influence of an apical negative pressure irrigation system on bacterial elimination during endodontic therapy: a prospective randomized clinical study[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(9): 1177-1781.
[16] Miller TA, Baumgartner JC.Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigation using the EndoVac to endodontic needle delivery[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(3): 509-511.

In vitro study of apical negative pressure irrigation on apical extrusion and E. faecalis elimination

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments