Clinical effect of  a new low-shrinkage composite on restoring dental wedge-shaped defects

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical effect of a new low-shrinkage composite FiltekTM P90 on restoring dental wedge-shaped defects. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with at least two equivalent non-carious cervical lesions on bilateral teeth (180 teeth with wedge-shaped defect) were enrolled in this study. Self-control design was used in this study. The teeth were randomly divided into experimental group which were restored with low-shrinkage composite FiltekTM P90 in one side, and the control group which were filled with FiltekTM Z350 XT composite resin in the other side. The modified USPHS / Ryge criteria were used to evaluate the treatment effects 6 months and 1 year after treatment. SPSS19.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The 6-months successful rate in FiltekTM P90 group was 96.55% and 95.40% in control group. The 1 year successful rate in FiltekTM P90 group was 94.05% and 90.48% in control group. There were no significant differences in main indexes, including successful rates ,retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, surface texture, color match, secondary caries and postoperative sensitivity between the 2 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low-shrinkage composite FiltekTM P90 is a good choice for treating dental wedge-shaped defects.

Key words: Wedge-shaped defect, Low-shrinkage resin, Methacrylate-based composite

CLC Number:

R783.3

ZHANG Yao, GE Wen-shu, LIU Chang, CAO Yu. Clinical effect of a new low-shrinkage composite on restoring dental wedge-shaped defects[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2016, 25(1): 47-52.

References

[1] 王嘉德, 高学军.牙体牙髓病学 [M].北京:北京大学医学出版社, 2006:199-202.
[2] Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration[J]. J Dent Res, 1987, 66(11): 1636-1639.
[3] Choi KK, Ryu GJ, Choi SM, et al. Effects of cavity configuration on composite restoration [J]. Oper Dent, 2004, 29(4): 462-469.
[4] Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, et al. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin [J]. Dent Mater, 2004, 20(6): 579-585.
[5] Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities [J]. Am J Dent, 2003, 16(4): 239-243.
[6] Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites [J]. Dent Mater, 2005, 21(1): 68-74.
[7] Yaman BC, Doruer I, Gümüta B, et al. Three-year randomized clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions[J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2014, 18(4): 1071-1079.
[8] Smith BG, Knight JK.An index for measuring the wear of teeth [J].Br Dent J, 1984, 156(12): 435-438.
[9] Schwartz RS, Fransmen R. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics: materials, clinical strategies and procedures for restoration of access cavities: a review [J]. J Endod, 2005, 31(3): 151-165.
[10] Duarte S Jr, Phark JH, Varj?o FM, et al. Nanoleakage, ultramorphological characteristics, and microtensile bond strengths of a new low-shrinkage composite to dentin after artificial aging [J]. Dent Mater, 2009, 25(5): 589-600.
[11] Navarra CO, Cadenaro M, Armstrong SR, et al. Degree of conversion of Filtek Silorane Adhesive System and Clearfil SE Bond within the hybrid and adhesive layer: an in situ Raman analysis [J]. Dent Mater, 2009, 25(9): 1178-1185.
[12] Mine A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, et al. TEM characterization of a silorane composite bonded to enamel/dentin [J]. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(6): 524-532.
[13] Min SH, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of shrinkage strain, modulus, and instrument compliance on polymerization shrinkage stress of light-cured composites during the initial curing stage[J]. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(10): 1024-1033.
[14] Papadogiannis D, Kakaboura A, Palaghias G, et al. Setting characteristics and cavity adaptation of low-shrinking resin composites [J]. Dent Mater, 2009,25(12): 1509-1516.
[15] Ilie N, Hickel R. Macro-, micro- and nano-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites [J]. Dent Mater, 2009, 25(6): 810-819.
[16] Yesilyurt C, Yoldas O, Altintas SH, et al. Effects of food-simulating liquids on the mechanical properties of a silorane-based dental composite [J]. Dent Mater J, 2009, 28(3): 362-367.
[17] Buergers R, Schneider-Brachert W, Hahnel S, et al. Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative [J]. Dent Mater, 2009, 25(2): 269-275.

Clinical effect of a new low-shrinkage composite on restoring dental wedge-shaped defects

RichHTML

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 5

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Jing, YIN Jin-ping, LIN Hua-jie, SUN Ya-li. Estimation of biomechanical behavior in deep wedge-shaped defects restored by different methods under static and dynamic loads: a 3D finite analysis [J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2022, 31(6): 615-620.
[2]	MA Jian, SHAO Qiang, YU Yi. The effect of commonly used subgingival wedge-shaped defect filling materials on the formation of Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm [J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2020, 29(4): 375-379.
[3]	HE Hong, WANG Yi.. Efficacy of Nd:Yap laser combined with composite resin for restoring hypersensitive wedge-shaped defect in 70 patients [J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(3): 305-308.
[4]	WANG Yi, HE Hong. Clinical observation of the efficacy of Hybrid coat combined with composite resin for restoring hypersensitive wedge-shaped defect [J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(1): 89-92.
[5]	REN Qiang, WANG Yi, WEI Kui-jie. Clinical effect of 3 polishing methods on resin composite restoration in filling wedge-shaped defect [J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2016, 25(3): 310-313.