Three-dimensional comparative study on the stability of bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty and simple genioplasty

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2023.04.008

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To establish a three-dimensional method to evaluate whether there is a difference in stability between bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty and simple genioplasty. METHODS: This study was a retrospective study. Sixty patients who underwent genioplasty were selected. They were divided into bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty group (n=30) and simple genioplasty group (n=30). The spiral CT data of patients at 2 months before operation (T0), 7 days after operation (T1) and 12 months after operation (T2) were collected, reconstructed and separated, and the three-dimensional model of maxilla and mandible was obtained. A three-dimensional analysis method of stability was established by 3D-matching. Recurrences in three-dimensional space 12 months after surgery were analyzed in two groups of patients. Statistical analysis of the data was performed with SPSS 26.0 software package. RESULTS: In simple genioplasty, the maximum amount of the chin recurrence was sagittal backward recurrence (0.54±0.38) mm, and the sagittal recurrence rate was 12.27%. In bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty, the maximum amount of the chin recurrence was sagittal backward recurrence (0.60±0.31) mm, and the sagittal recurrence rate was 12.96%. Rotation occurred in both groups 12 months after operation, which was 1.98±2.70° in the simple genioplasty group and 1.01±1.61° in the bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the sagittal movement of the chin between the two groups, and in the sagittal recurrence(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The three-dimensional method established in this study can be used to evaluate the stability after genioplasty. The recurrence after genioplasty mainly occurred in the sagittal direction. The rotation trend of chin after genioplasty is worthy of attention. There was no increased risk for bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty.

Key words: Genioplasty, Chin deformity, Stability, Orthognathic surgery

CLC Number:

R782.2

ZHANG Chen, WANG Hong-wei, LI Biao, CAO Jian, WANG Xing, WANG Xu-dong. Three-dimensional comparative study on the stability of bimaxillary simultaneous genioplasty and simple genioplasty[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 32(4): 380-384.

References

[1] 吕毅敏, 卢利. 颏部畸形的诊断及治疗进展[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2018, 5(33): 15-16.
[2] Guyuron B, Michelow B, Willis L.Practical classification of chin deformities[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 1995, 19(3): 257-264.
[3] Trauner R, Obwegeser H.The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. II. Operating methods for microgenia and distoclusion[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1957, 10(9): 899-909.
[4] Janssens E, Shujaat S, Shaheen E, et al.Long-term stability of isolated advancement genioplasty, and influence of associated risk factors: a systematic review[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2021, 49(4): 269-276.
[5] Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF.New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(3): 606-622.
[6] van der Linden C, van der Linden WJ, Reyneke JP. Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement with and without advancement genioplasty[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 44(5): 621-626.
[7] 应王君子, 沈舜尧, 李彪, 等. 唇腭裂患者正颌术后上颌骨短期稳定性的三维分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(3): 345-351.
[8] Li B, Wei H, Zeng F, et al.Application of a novel three-dimensional printing genioplasty template system and its clinical validation: a control study[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 5431-5437.
[9] Shaik M, Koteswar Rao N, Kiran Kumar N, et al.Comparison of rigid and semirigid fixation for advancement genioplasty[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2013, 12(3): 260-265.
[10] Shaughnessy S, Mobarak KA, Høgevold HE, et al.Long-term skeletal and soft-tissue responses after advancement genioplasty[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(1): 8-17.
[11] Reddy PS, Kashyap B, Hallur N, et al.Advancement genioplasty-cephalometric analysis of osseous and soft tissue changes[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2011, 10(4): 288-295.
[12] Polido W, Bell W.Long-term osseous and soft tissue changes after large chin advancements[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 1993, 21(2): 54-59.
[13] Kumar BL, Raju GK, Kumar ND, et al.Long term stability following genioplasty: a cephalometric study[J]. J Int Oral Health, 2015, 7(4): 44-50.
[14] Erbe C, Mulie R M, Ruf S.Advancement genioplasty in Class I patients: predictability and stability of facial profile changes[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 40(11): 1258-1262.
[15] Budharapu A, Sinha R, Tauro DP, et al.Musculoskeletal changes as a sequel to advancement genioplasty: a long-term cephalometric prospective study[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2018, 17(2): 233-241.
[16] Chen K, Sun X, Wang L, et al.A modified cosmetic genioplasty can affect airway space positively in skeletal Class II patients: studying alterations of hyoid bone position and posterior airway space[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2020, 44(5): 1639-1655.
[17] Ayoub A, Stirrups D, Moos K.Assessment of chin surgery by a coordinate free method[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1994, 23(1): 6-10.
[18] Joss CU, Vassalli IM.Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(2): 301-313.