Effect of different pretreatment methods on dentin microleakage and bonding effect in caries

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2021.06.005

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of different pretreatment methods on dentin microleakage and bonding effect of caries, so as to provide reference for clinical practice. METHODS: Sixty isolated caries were collected from Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2020 to December 2020, and 120 dental samples were obtained by grinding them into two halves along the long axis of the precursor teeth. According to different pretreatment methods, they were divided into group A (2%NaClO), group B (2% chlorhexidine) and group C (75% ethanol). The bond strength, microtensile test and microleakage of the three groups of teeth were compared. SPSS 24.0 software package was used for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: The bond strength of the three groups from high to low was group A, group B and group C(P<0.05); the fracture type of the three groups was compared, mixed damage of group A was lower than that of group B and group C; microleakage of the three groups was compared, and microleakage of group A was better than that of group B and group C(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment with 2%NaClO can reduce dentin microleakage and significantly improve the bonding strength of teeth, which is conducive to the promotion and application in the treatment of dental diseases.

Key words: Caries, Dentin, Microleakage, Bonding effect, Microtensile test

CLC Number:

R781.1

HUANG Wen-qing, LI Yu, YANG Jian. Effect of different pretreatment methods on dentin microleakage and bonding effect in caries[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2021, 30(6): 585-588.

References

[1] Siqueira F, Cardenas A, Gomes GM, et al.Three-year effects of deproteinization on the in vitro durability of resin/dentin-eroded interfaces[J]. Oper Dent, 2018, 43(1): 60-70.
[2] Pintado-Palomino K, de Almeida CVVB, da Motta RJG, et al. Clinical, double blind, randomized controlled trial of experimental adhesive protocols in caries-affected dentin[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019, 23(4): 1855-1864.
[3] Khoroush M, Keshani F, Esmaeili M, et al.Marginal integrity of cervical restorations with caries-affected dentinal walls: effect of contamination with hemostatic agents[J]. J Dent (Tehran), 2018, 15(4): 214-221.
[4] Wu ZG, Li FL, Liu C, et al.Interfacial sealing between normal dentin and caries-affected dentin with glass-ceramic and three types of bonding systems[J]. Am J Dent, 2019, 32(5): 260-264.
[5] Wierichs RJ, Stausberg S, Lausch J, et al.Caries-preventive effect of NaF, NaF plus TCP, NaF plus CPP-ACP, and SDF varnishes on sound dentin and artificial dentin caries in vitro[J]. Caries Res, 2018, 52(3): 199-211.
[6] Cassiano L, Pessan J, Comar L, et al.Frequency of intake and amount of fluoride in milk for remineralisation of artificial caries on enamel and dentine: ex vivo/in situ study[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2017, 73: 136-141.
[7] Gan J, Liu S, Zhou L, et al.Effect of Nd:YAG laser irradiation pretreatment on the long-term bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive to dentin[J]. Oper Dent, 2017, 42(1): 62-72.
[8] Mounajjed R, Salinas TJ, Ingr T, et al.Effect of different resin luting cements on the marginal fit of lithium disilicate pressed crowns[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 119(6): 975-980.
[9] Amiri EM, Balouch F, Atri F.Effect of self-adhesive and separate etch adhesive dual cure resin cements on the bond dtrength of fiber post to dentin at different parts of the root[J]. J Dent (Tehran), 2017, 14(3): 153-158.
[10] 王爱平. 不同修复方法修复牙体缺损的微渗漏比较[J].中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(4): 616-617.
[11] 王楠, 侯爱兵. 次氯酸钠预处理对牙本质粘结强度的影响[J]. 浙江医学, 2018, 40(14): 1574-1576.
[12] Piperidou M, Sodhi NSR, Kolosowski K, et al.Effects of final irrigation with smearOFF on the surface of dentin using surface analytical methods[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(11): 1714-1719.
[13] Krishnan U, Saji SG, Clarkson R, et al.Free active chlorine in sodium hypochlorite solutions admixed with octenidine, smearOFF, chlorhexidine, and EDTA[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(8): 1354-1359.
[14] Nocca G, Ahmed HMA, Martorana GE, et al.Chromographic analysis and cytotoxic effects of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite reaction mixtures[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(9): 1545-1552.
[15] Bukhary S, Balto H.Antibacterial efficacy of octenisept, alexidine, chlorhexidine, and sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(4): 643-647.
[16] Thaha KA, Varma RL, Nair MG, et al.Interaction between octenidine-based solution and sodium hypochlorite: a mass spectroscopy, proton nuclear magnetic resonance, and scanning electron microscopy-based observational study[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(1): 135-140.
[17] Ghabraei S, Bolhari B, Sabbagh MM, et al.Comparison of antimicrobial effects of triple antibiotic paste and calcium hydroxide mixed with 2% chlorhexidine as intracanal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm[J]. J Dent (Tehran), 2018, 15(3): 151-160.
[18] Ou Q, Tan L, Huang X, et al.Effect of matrix metalloproteinase 8 inhibitor and chlorhexidine on the cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and cytokine level of MDPC-23[J]. Dent Mater, 2018, 34(11): e301-e308.