上海口腔医学 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 237-242.

• 系统评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

纤维桩和金属螺纹桩修复效果的系统评价

张胜楠1, 杜庆2, 韩凉1, 刘萍1, 李婷1, 张莉莉1   

  1. 1.济南市口腔医院 修复科, 山东 济南 230001;
    2.济南市第四人民医院 急救中心, 山东 济南 230013
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-19 出版日期:2014-04-20 发布日期:2014-05-21
  • 作者简介:张胜楠(1983-), 女, 硕士, E-mail:nancybaby-001@163.com杜庆, E-mail:duqing0325@126.com

Fiber post versus metal screw post for repair of residual crowns and roots: a systematic review

ZHANG Sheng-nan1, DU Qing2, HAN Liang1, LIU Ping1, LI Ting1, ZHANG Li-li1   

  1. 1.Department of Prosthodontics, Jinan Stomatological Hospital. Jinan 250001;
    2. Department of Emergency, No.4 People’s Hospital of Jinan. Jinan 250010, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2013-07-19 Online:2014-04-20 Published:2014-05-21

摘要: 目的: 系统评价纤维桩和金属螺纹桩修复残根、残冠的效果。方法: 计算机检索MEDLINE(Ovid)、PubMed、The Cochrane Libary、Embase、万方、维普、CNKI和CBM等数据库, 检索时限均从建库至2013年6月, 收集比较纤维桩和金属螺纹桩修复残根、残冠的随机对照试验(RCT)。由2名研究者对纳入研究进行资料提取和质量评价后, 采用RevMan 5.1.0软件和GRADEprofiler 3.2.2软件进行数据分析。结果: 共纳入10个RCT, 其中英文1篇, 中文9篇。Meta分析4个主要结局的结果显示, 纤维桩与金属螺纹桩比较, 纤维桩修复成年恒牙和年轻恒牙的留存率均显著高于金属螺纹桩, 根折发生率差异显著。桩脱落发生率、牙龈炎发生率差异无显著性。每个结局的GRADE系统推荐分级均为低等级。结论: 利用纤维桩进行修复较金属螺纹桩保存率高, 根折发生率低。但纳入研究较少, 样本量小, 质量不高且研究方法有差异, 需要今后开展更多经过科学设计、大样本量、多中心的RCT研究予以证实。

关键词: 纤维桩, 金属螺纹桩, 残根, 残冠, 随机对照试验, 系统评价, Meta分析

Abstract: PURPOSE:To evaluate the restorative effectiveness of fiber post versus metal screw post through systematical review. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) data from the establishment of the database up to June 2013 were searched from MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang Data, VIP, CNKI and CBM using the designed strategy. After data extraction and quality review of the retrieved articles by two independent investigators, the softwares of RevMan 5.1.0 and GRAED profiler 3.2.2 were employed to process data analysis. RESULTS: Ten RCTs were finally included, of which 1 was English literature and 9 were Chinese literatures. Meta analysis suggested that the survival rate of repair of adult and young permanent teeth was significantly higher using fiber post than metal screw post , and the results root fracture rate was significantly lower . No significant difference was found in the rate of post-core fall off and gingivitis . All outcomes were of low quality in the GRADE system. CONCLUSIONS:Compared with metal screw post, the survival rate is significantly higher and the root fracture rate is significantly lower by using fiber post. However, the conclusion is limited by lack of relevant studies, small sample sizes, inadequate quality and diversified methodology. Further study is needed by employing more well-designed, large-sample and multi-center RCTs to verify the conclusion.

Key words: Fiber post, Metal screw post, Residual crown, Residual roots, Randomized controlled trial, Systematic review, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: