不同表面处理方法对非龋性硬化牙本质黏结强度的影响

上海口腔医学 ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 662-666.

不同表面处理方法对非龋性硬化牙本质黏结强度的影响

王雪¹，仇丽鸿¹，李子木²，孙海燕¹

(1.中国医科大学附属口腔医院牙体牙髓病科，辽宁省口腔医学研究所，辽宁沈阳 110002；2.沈阳军区总医院牙体牙髓病科，辽宁沈阳 110016)

收稿日期:2013-03-22 修回日期:3013-05-28 出版日期:2013-04-12 发布日期:2013-04-12
通讯作者: 仇丽鸿，Tel:024-22895932，E-mail:drqlh@yahoo.com
作者简介:王雪(1986-)，女，硕士，E-mail:15524299929@163.com

Effect of different surface managements on micro-tensile bond strength of non-carious sclerotic dentin to resin

WANG Xue¹, QIU Li-hong¹, LI Zi-mu², SUN Hai-yan¹

1.Department of Endodontics, School of Stomatology, China Medical University, Liaoning Institute of Dental Research. Shenyang 110002; 2. Department of Endodontics, the General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region. Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China

Received:2013-03-22 Revised:3013-05-28 Online:2013-04-12 Published:2013-04-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：通过微拉伸黏结强度实验，比较3种不同方法处理硬化牙本质表面后对复合树脂黏结强度的影响。方法：选择15颗因牙周病拔除硬化牙本质视觉分级为3级以上的面磨损磨牙，将牙根包埋在自凝塑料中，低速锯垂直于磨损面，沿颊舌径将磨损牙分为面积近似相等的两部分，每部分面积不小于6 mm2。然后在确认每颗牙分割的两部分不进入同一个实验组前提下，将30个样本随机分为3个实验组，每组10个样本。抛光组直接抛光硬化牙本质表面后，联合Optibond处理，Premisa复合树脂充填；金刚砂组用EX-26金刚砂车针打磨硬化牙本质表面，联合Optibond处理，Premisa复合树脂充填；球钻组用5#球钻处理硬化牙本质表面，联合Optibond处理，Premisa复合树脂充填。将离体牙置于37℃人工唾液中24 h后，制作微拉伸试件，测试黏结强度，在体视显微镜下观察断裂模式并分类。采用SPSS17.0软件包对试件微拉伸黏结强度值进行单因素方差分析。结果：3种不同牙面处理后的微拉伸黏结强度分别为抛光处理组(10.48±1.29) MPa，金刚砂处理组(21.52±0.97) MPa，球钻处理组(16.30±1.02) MPa。金刚砂处理组的微拉伸黏结强度大于其他2组，球钻处理组黏结强度显著大于抛光组，差别具有显著性(P<0.05)。体视显微镜观察发现，断裂多发生于树脂-牙本质黏结界面。结论：金刚砂车针处理后的硬化牙本质，树脂-牙本质微拉伸黏结强度大于球钻和抛光处理后的黏结强度。

关键词: 硬化牙本质, 全酸蚀黏结, 微拉伸黏结强度

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the micro-tensile bond strength of 3 different surface managements to non-carious sclerotic dentin. MOTHODS: Fifteen periodontal patients’ occlusal wearing molars which were above 3rd degree were selected. The teeth were equally cut into two pieces along the buccolingual direction, and each piece was randomly divided into 3 groups. Group 1 was processed with polishing, group 2 was processed with EX-26 diamond bur and group 3 was processed with 5# round bur. All teeth were subjected to Optibond treatment, and then filled with composite resin (Premisa) and saved in normal artificial saliva (37℃) for 24 hours. At last, fatigue test pieces were made, the micro-tensile bond strength was evaluated and every specimen was examined under stero-microscope. The micro-tensile bond strength was analyzed with one-way analysis of variance using SPSS17.0 software package. RESULTS: The micro-tensile bond strength of the 3 groups were (10.48±1.29) MPa, (21.52±0.97) MPa and(16.30±1.02) MPa, respectively. The bond strength of EX-26 diamond bur group was significantly greater than that of the other 2 groups(P<0.05). The bond strength of 5# round bur group was significantly greater than that of polishing group (P<0.05). The breakage mostly happened in adhesive dentine surface. CONCLUSIONS: Non-carious sclerotic dentin which is processed with diamond bur has better micro-tensile bonding strength.

Key words: Sclerotic dentin, All-etching adhesive, Micro-tensile bond strength

中图分类号:

R781.2

王雪, 仇丽鸿, 李子木, 孙海燕. 不同表面处理方法对非龋性硬化牙本质黏结强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(6): 662-666.

WANG Xue, QIU Li-hong, LI Zi-mu, SUN Hai-yan. Effect of different surface managements on micro-tensile bond strength of non-carious sclerotic dentin to resin[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2013, 22(6): 662-666.

参考文献

[1] 樊明文. 牙体牙髓病学[M]. 第3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 136.
[2] Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review [J]. J Dent, 2004, 32(3): 173-196.
[3] Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Prawer S, et al. Micromorphological investigation of noncarious cervical lesions treated with demineralizing agents [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2000, 2(4): 279-287.
[4] Tay FR, Kwong SM, Itthagarun A, et al. Bonding of a self-etching primer to non-carious cervical sclerotic dentin: interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile bond strength evaluation [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2000, 2(1): 9-28.
[5] Kwong SM, Cheung GS, Kei LH, et al. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self -etching and total -etching technique [J]. Dental Mater, 2002, 18(5): 359-369.
[6] Hosoya Y, Kawada E, Ushigome T, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of sound and caries-affected primary tooth dentin measured with original designed jig [J]. J Biomed Mater Res (part B) Appl Biomater, 2006, 77(2): 241-248.
[7] 郑铁丽, 黄翠, 张智星, 等. 离体牙储存方式对牙本质黏结剂微拉伸强度的影响 [J]. 上海口腔医学, 2005, 14(2): 147-150.
[8] 李子木, 仇丽鸿, 孙海燕. 脉冲Nd: YAG激光对非龋性硬化牙本质自酸蚀黏结强度的影响 [J]. 上海口腔医学,2009,18(4): 346-349.
[9] 仇丽鸿, 孙海燕. 牙齿磨损的特点及临床治疗 [J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2009, 2(12): 716-718.
[10] Colloca ME, Ahumada MC, López ME, et al. Surface properties of lactobacilli isolated from healthy subjects [J]. Oral Dis,2000,6(4): 227-233.
[11] Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, et al. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin impregnated layer [J]. Oper Dent,1994,19(2):59- 64.
[12] Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Claros AG, et al. Microtensile testing of dentin adhesive [J]. Dent Mater, 1998, 14(3): 194-201.
[13] Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin [J]. Dent Mater, 1998, 14(2): 120-128.
[14] Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross- sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test [J]. Dent Mater, 1998, 14(3): 212-221.
[15] Luque-Martinez IV, Mena-Serrano A, Mu?oz MA, et al. Effect of bur roughness on bond to sclerotic dentin with self-etch adhesive systems [J]. Oper Dent, 2013, 38(1): 39-47.
[16] Ermisa RB, De Munck J, Cardosoa MV, et al. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin prepared with three different diamond burs [J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(7): 978-985.
[17] Ayad MF. Effects of rotary instrumentation and different etchants on removal of smear layer on human dentin [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2001, 85(1): 67-72.
[18] Inoue H, Inoue S, Uno S, et al. Microtensile bond strength of two single-step adhesive systems to bur-prepared dentin [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2001, 3(2): 129-136.