下颌前导矫形与单纯拔牙矫治对骨性Ⅱ类错颌畸形的疗效评价

上海口腔医学 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 597-600.

下颌前导矫形与单纯拔牙矫治对骨性Ⅱ类错颌畸形的疗效评价

宫耀¹, 于泉¹, 李佩伦¹, 汪虹虹¹, 魏斌², 沈刚¹

1.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院口腔正畸科,2.口腔特需科, 上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海 200011

收稿日期:2014-03-06 修回日期:2014-04-08 出版日期:2014-10-20 发布日期:2015-02-04
通讯作者: 沈刚,Tel：021-23271699-5206,E-mail:gangshen@orthosh.com
作者简介:宫耀（1967-）,女,学士,副主任医师,E-mail:gongyao0328@hotmail.com

Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion

GONG Yao¹, YU Quan¹, LI Pei-lun¹, WANG Hong-hong¹, WEI Bin², SHEN Gang¹

1.Department of Orthodontics, 2.Department of First Dental Clinic, Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2014-03-06 Revised:2014-04-08 Online:2014-10-20 Published:2015-02-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：通过X线头影测量分析,评价前导矫形联合固定矫治器矫治和单纯拔牙固定矫治对生长发育期安氏Ⅱ类骨性错颌畸形的临床疗效。方法选取31例生长发育期安氏Ⅱ类错颌畸形伴下颌后缩的病例。其中,18例采用Ⅰ期固定式Twin-block矫治器联合Ⅱ期固定矫治;13例采用传统的单纯拔牙后使用直丝弓矫治器进行治疗。在治疗前、Twin-block矫治完成后以及全部固定矫治结束后拍摄X线头颅侧位片,利用Pancherz测量分析法进行分析,使用SPSS15.0软件包分别比较前导矫形组、单纯拔牙组治疗前后的组内差异以及2组的组间差异。结果前导矫形组下颌骨长度增加并向前移动,上切牙相对于上颌骨的位置向后方移动,下切牙、下颌第一恒磨牙相对于下颌骨的位置均向前方移动,覆盖减小（P<0.05）。单纯拔牙组上、下颌骨的位置、髁突位置及下颌骨的长度治疗前后均无显著变化。在前牙覆盖的纠正中,前导组牙性因素占39.5%,骨性因素占60.5%,拔牙组牙性因素占86.9%,骨性因素占13.1%;在磨牙关系的纠正中,前导组牙性因素占44.9%,骨性因素占55.1%,拔牙组牙性因素占90.3%,骨性因素占9.7%。结论前导矫形联合固定矫治与单纯拔牙固定矫治相比,在治疗生长发育期骨性Ⅱ类下颌后缩的患者中,疗效近似,但能更显著地改善患者的骨性侧貌。

关键词: 骨性Ⅱ, 类错颌畸形, Twin-block矫治器, Pancherz分析, 双期矫治

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-Block combined with straight wire appliances and tooth extraction in the treatment of skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion with mandibular retrognathia in growing individuals. METHODS: The sample comprised 31 growing individuals with skeletal Class Ⅱ and mandibular retrognathia,divided into 2 groups. One group (18 patients) was treated with fixed Twin-block combined with fixed appliance; the other group (13 patients) was only treated with fixed appliance after tooth extraction. Lateral cephalograms pretreatment and posttreatment were taken before and after Twin-block treatment and after all fixed appliance treatment. Pancherz’s cephalometric measurements were analyzed statistically. Intragroup and intergroup changes of the two groups were evaluated by test using SPSS 15.0 software package. RESULTS: According to Pancherz's analysis, mandibular length increased, point Pg, mandibular incisors and first molars moved forward, maxillary incisors moved backward, overjet decreased (P<0.05) after treatment with Twin-block and fixed appliance. Within the rectification of anterior overjet, proportion of dentofacial factor was 39.5%, skeletal factor was 60.5%. Within the rectification of posterior relationship, proportion of dentofacial factor was 44.9%, skeletal factor was 55.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Twin-block combined with fixed appliance treatment can efficiently promote mandibular growth, restrict forward growth of maxilla to some extent, correct incisor and molar relationship and improve skeletal profile in growing skeletal Class Ⅱ individuals with mandibular retrognathia.

Key words: Skeletal Class Ⅱ, malocclusion, Twin-block appliance, Pancherz analysis, Two-phase treatment

宫耀, 于泉, 李佩伦, 汪虹虹, 魏斌, 沈刚. 下颌前导矫形与单纯拔牙矫治对骨性Ⅱ类错颌畸形的疗效评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(5): 597-600.

GONG Yao, YU Quan, LI Pei-lun, WANG Hong-hong, WEI Bin, SHEN Gang. Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2014, 23(5): 597-600.

参考文献

[1] Kelly JE, Harvey CR. An assessment of the occlusion of the teeth of youths 12-17 years [J]. Vital Health Stat,1977, (162): 1-65.
[2] McLain JB, Proffitt WR. Oral health status in the United States: prevalence of malocclusion[J]. J Dent Educ,1985,49(6): 386-397.
[3] Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES ⅡI survey [J]. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 1998, 13(2): 97-106.
[4] Moyers RE, Riolo ML, Guire KE, et al. Differential diagnosis of Class Ⅱ malocclusions. Part 1. Facial types associated with Class Ⅱ malocclusions [J]. Am J Orthod, 1980, 78(5): 477-494.
[5] McNamara JA Jr. Components of class Ⅱ malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age [J].Angle Orthod,1981,51(3):177-202.
[6] 邹冰爽, 曾祥龙, 曾应魁. 安氏Ⅱ 1 类错颌颅面类型的研究 [J].中华口腔医学杂志, 1999, 47(1): 35.
[7] Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years[J]. Eur J Orthod,1983,5(1):1-46.
[8] Björk A. The relationship of the jaws to the cranium[C]// Lundstrom A. Introduction to orthodontics [M]. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1960: 104-140.
[9] Springate SD, Jones AG. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants[J]. Am J Orthod, 1998, 113(3): 263-270.
[10] Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class Ⅱ malocclusion: a comparative study [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(5): 594-602.
[11] Gill DS, Lee RT. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005, 127(4): 465-472.
[12] Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class Ⅱ sample [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999, 116(6): 597-609.
[13] Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class Ⅱ malocclusions with the twin block appliance [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000, 118(1): 24-33.
[14] Harradine NW, Gale D. The effects of torque control spurs in twin-block appliances [J]. Clin Orthod Res, 2000, 3(4): 202-209.
[15] O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class Ⅱ malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortho, 2003, 124(2): 128-137.
[16] 陈国新, 陈香, 贺红, 等. 骨性Angle Ⅱ类2分类错颌正畸治疗前后硬组织的变化 [J]. 口腔医学研究, 2005, 20(3): 316-318.