强支抗拔牙对双颌前突青少年上气道的影响

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.04.017

上海口腔医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 419-423.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2018.04.017

强支抗拔牙对双颌前突青少年上气道的影响

陈威^1,*, 刘月华², 徐啟^1,*

1.杭州口腔医院城西分院正畸科,浙江杭州 310013;
2.上海市口腔疾病防治院·上海市口腔医院正畸科,上海 200001;

收稿日期:2017-08-26 修回日期:2017-12-14 出版日期:2018-08-25 发布日期:2018-10-09
通讯作者: 刘月华,E-mail：liuyuehua@fudan.edu.cn
作者简介:陈威（1983-）,男,硕士,主治医师, E-mail:88294426@qq.com;徐啟（1992-）,女,硕士, E-mail：joshua66@126.com。^*并列第一作者

Effect of maximum anchorage extraction on upper airway in adolescent patients with bimaxillary protrusion

CHEN Wei¹, LIU Yue-hua², XU Qi¹

1.Department of Orthodontics, Hangzhou West Dental Hospital. Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang Province;
2.Department of Orthodontics, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital. Shanghai 200001, China

Received:2017-08-26 Revised:2017-12-14 Online:2018-08-25 Published:2018-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 利用锥形束CT（cone beam computed tomography, CBCT）从三维方向上研究强支抗拔牙内收对双颌前突青少年上气道的影响。方法: 回顾分析本院50例予以强支抗拔牙治疗的双颌前突青少年治疗前、后的CBCT资料,测量治疗前、后上气道的变化。采用SPSS 17.0软件包对数据进行配对t检验和Pearson相关性分析。结果: 治疗后,口咽和咽下的体积、平均截面积、最小截面积显著减小(P<0.001);口咽、咽下的横截面形态更趋于椭圆形(P<0.001)。Pearson相关分析发现,下颌切牙内收、舌骨后移与咽下气道平均截面积减少有显著相关性(P<0.05);上、下颌切牙内收与舌骨后移有显著相关性(P<0.01)。结论: 对于青少年双颌前突患者,制订治疗计划时应兼顾上气道形态,避免造成上气道狭窄,影响患者正常发育。

关键词: 上气道, 锥形束CT, 青少年, 强支抗, 拔牙

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of maximum anchorage on upper airway in adolescent patients with bimaxillary protrusion and extraction from three-dimensional direction on cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT). METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was carried out on pre- and post-orthodontic treatment records of 50 adolescents with bimaxillary protrusion treated by maximum anchorage extraction. The changes on upper airway pre- and post-treatment were measured. The data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 software package. RESULTS: It was found that the volume, mean cross-section area, minimum cross-section area of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal airway were significantly decreased after treatment (P<0.001). The cross-section morphology of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal airway showed more ellipsoid(P<0.001). Pearson's correlation analysis indicated that the lower incisor retraction and hyoid retraction was correlated with mean cross-section area of hypopharyngeal airway (P<0.05). There was significant correlation in the upper and lower incisor retraction and hyoid retraction(P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The upper airway dimension should be given serious consideration on the decision when closing the space with maximum anchorage in adolescent patients.

Key words: Upper airway, Cone-beam CT, Adolescent, Maximum anchorage, Extraction

中图分类号:

R783.5

陈威, 刘月华, 徐啟. 强支抗拔牙对双颌前突青少年上气道的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(4): 419-423.

CHEN Wei, LIU Yue-hua, XU Qi. Effect of maximum anchorage extraction on upper airway in adolescent patients with bimaxillary protrusion[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(4): 419-423.

参考文献

[1] Meoli AL, Casey KR, Clark RW, et al.Hypopnea in sleep-disordered breathing in adults[J]. Sleep, 2001, 24(4): 469-470.
[2] Aboudara C, Nielsen I, Huang JC, et al.Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral head films and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 135(4): 468-479.
[3] Yamashina A, Tanimoto K, Sutthiprapaporn P, et al.The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of the oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2008, 37(5): 245-251.
[4] Melsen B.The cranial base[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1974, 32(1): 86-101.
[5] Baumrind S, Ben-Bassat Y, Bravo LA, et al.Partitioning the components of maxillary tooth displacement by the comparison of data from three cephalometric superimpositions[J]. Angle Orthod, 1996, 66(2): 111-124.
[6] Björk A.Prediction of mandibular growth rotation[J]. Am J Orthod, 1969, 55(6): 585-599.
[7] Celenk M, Farrell ML, Eren H, et al.Upper airway detection and visualization from cone beam image slices[J]. J Xray Sci Technol, 2010, 18(2): 121-135.
[8] Houston WJ.The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurement[J]. Am J Orthod, 1983, 83(5): 382-390.
[9] Abramson Z, Susarla S, Troulis M, et al.Age-related changes of the upper airway assessed by 3-dimensional computed tomography[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2009, 20(Suppl 1): 657-663.
[10] Germec-Cakan D, Taner T, Akan S.Uvulo-glossopharyngeal dimensions in non-extraction, extraction with minimum anchorage, and extraction with maximum anchorage[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2011, 33(5): 515-520.
[11] Kiliç N, Oktay H.Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on nasal breathing and some naso-respiratory and breathing problems in growing children: a literature review[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2008, 72(11): 1595-1601.
[12] Sayinsu K, Isik F, Arun T.Sagittal airway dimensions following maxillary protraction: a pilot study[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2006, 28(2): 184-189.
[13] Chen Y, Hong L, Wang CL, et al.Effect of large incisor retraction on upper airway morphology in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 82(6): 964-970.
[14] Kim MA, Park YH. Does upper premolar extraction affect the changes of pharyngeal airway volume after bimaxillary surgery in skeletal Class Ⅲ patients?[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 72(1): 165.e1-10.
[15] Verma SL, Sharma VP, Singh GP, et al.Comparative assessment of soft-tissue changes in Class II division 1 patients following extraction and non-extraction treatment[J]. Dent Res J (Isfahan), 2013, 10(6): 764-771.
[16] Wang Q, Jia P, Anderson NK, et al.Changes of pharyngeal airway size and hyoid bone position following orthodontic treatment of Class I bimaxillary protrusion[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 82(1): 115-121.
[17] Tselnik M, Pogrel MA.Assessment of the pharyngeal airway space after mandibular setback surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2000, 58(3): 282-285.
[18] Al Maaitah E, El Said N, Abu Alhaija ES.First premolar extraction effects on upper airway dimension in bimaxillary proclination patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 82(5): 853-859.
[19] Stefanovic N, El H, Chenin DL, et al.Three-dimensional pharyngeal airway changes in orthodontic patients treated with and without extractions[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2013, 16(2): 87-96.

强支抗拔牙对双颌前突青少年上气道的影响

Effect of maximum anchorage extraction on upper airway in adolescent patients with bimaxillary protrusion

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王文丽, 傅亚婷, 刘华, 马潇. 上颌前牙美学区牙龈三维形态的锥形束CT测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 177-182.
[2]	张薇, 陈威, 陈志方. 可调式活动牵引器治疗上颌唇侧倒置阻生中切牙效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 193-197.
[3]	巨佳, 杨驰, 武和明, 赵吉宏, 成黎霏, 张欢, 冯斌, 胡开进. 黄牛煅烧骨填充材料用于拔牙后牙槽骨缺损修复的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 198-202.
[4]	邵云, 崔啟春, 何欢, 程庆涛, 任嘉玮, 李晶, 朱微燕, 姜慕雅, 刘嘉靓. 氧化亚氮/氧吸入舒适化技术在老年高血压患者心电监护拔牙中的应用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 97-100.
[5]	宋珏, 刘好好, 刘嘉靓, 陈美华. 上颌磨牙与上颌窦黏膜增厚发生的相关性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 638-642.
[6]	吕云松, 李朝晖. 颞下颌关节紊乱综合征伴偏侧咀嚼患者锥形束CT特征分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 653-656.
[7]	鞠雅琼, 徐晓明, 韩祥永, 马茵, 王桂香. 口腔专科护理模式对青少年正畸患者牙周健康的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 657-660.
[8]	周子芊, 陈振琦. 上颌窦底对上颌第一磨牙近中移动的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 661-667.
[9]	林翔, 傅裕杰, 任根强, 温佳欢, 陈宇飞, 张旗. U-Net神经网络分割锥形束CT影像中下颌磨牙牙体与牙髓腔及其准确性验证[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 454-459.
[10]	张怡雯, 邹多宏, 张志愿. 不同方式处理犬下颌磨牙区即刻种植间隙的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 337-342.
[11]	江润洋, 康非吾. 唑来膦酸对小鼠下颌拔牙创早期修复过程的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 349-353.
[12]	马智菲, 周梦琪, 王丽珍, 承清, 洪瑾. Er:YAG 激光在小型猪牙髓血运重建术中的应用效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 367-373.
[13]	黄锦程, 赵华强, 李国菊. Stafne骨腔影像学特征：基于CBCT的回顾性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 439-444.
[14]	谢勤, 林珊, 林立, 李多. 青少年正畸上颌切牙不同内收方式对牙槽骨形态的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 290-294.
[15]	林怡君, 鄢洁雅, 王天鸽, 周志捷, 廖盛轩, 毛丽霞, 刘加强. 减数正畸治疗中中切牙牙根及牙槽骨形态变化的锥形束CT测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 211-216.