非减数治疗中不同托槽对牙弓三维方向的影响

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.02.012

上海口腔医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 176-180.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2018.02.012

非减数治疗中不同托槽对牙弓三维方向的影响

许亮, 黄晓红, 林珊

福建医科大学附属第一医院口腔科,福建福州 350005

收稿日期:2017-07-07 修回日期:2017-09-09 出版日期:2018-04-25 发布日期:2018-05-14
通讯作者: 黄晓红,E-mail：598675984@qq.com
作者简介:许亮（1987-）,男,硕士研究生,住院医师,E-mail：672692584@qq.com
基金资助:
福建省教育厅科技项目（JK2014018）

Investigation on the effects of different brackets on the three-dimensional direction of the arch in the non reduction treatment

XU Liang, HUANG Xiao-hong, LIN Shan

Department of Stomatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Fuzhou 350005,Fujian Province, China

Received:2017-07-07 Revised:2017-09-09 Online:2018-04-25 Published:2018-05-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:探讨非减数治疗中,传统托槽与Damon自锁托槽系统在三维方向上对牙弓产生的影响差异,为临床提供参考。方法:选择非减数治疗的正畸患者45例,随机分为传统托槽+Cu-NiTi丝组(A组)、Damon 3mx+Cu-NiTi丝组（B组）和传统托槽+NiTi丝组（C组）,各组按相同的弓丝顺序和时间排齐整平牙列。分别测量3组术前（T0）和排齐整平后（T1）牙弓前(a)、中(b)、后段(c)的宽度以及头颅侧位片中U1-SN、U1-PP、L1-MP、U6-PP（mm）、L6-MP（mm）等相关数据,采用SPSS22.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:通过方差分析和t检验,A、B、C 3组的相关数据在治疗前、后的改变量无显著差异。结论:在轻度拥挤的非减数病例中,Damon系统托槽与传统托槽对牙弓在三维方向上的影响无显著差异。

关键词: Damon系统, 非减数拔牙, 牙弓宽度, 头影测量

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the three-dimensional effect between traditional brackets and Damon self- ligating brackets on the arch during non-extraction treatment. METHODS: Forty-five patients with non-extraction treatment were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups. Patients in group A were treated with traditional brackets and Nickel titanium wire. Patients in group B were treated with Damon 3mx brackets and Cu-NiTi wire. Patients in group C were treated with traditional brackets and Cu-NiTi wire.Dentitions were aligned in each group according to the same order of arch wire and time. The widths of arch and cephalometric data, such as U1-SN, U1-PP, L1-MP, U6-PP (mm), L6-MP (mm) and other related datas, in T1 and T2 were measured and analyzed with SPSS 22.0 software package. RESULTS: Expansion and protrusion of the arch were observed, but there was no significant difference before and after treatment among 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in the three-dimensional effect between Damon brackets and traditional brackets in non-extraction treatment of patients with mild crowding.

Key words: Damon system, Non-extraction, Arch width, Cephalometrics

中图分类号:

R783.5

许亮, 黄晓红, 林珊. 非减数治疗中不同托槽对牙弓三维方向的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(2): 176-180.

XU Liang, HUANG Xiao-hong, LIN Shan. Investigation on the effects of different brackets on the three-dimensional direction of the arch in the non reduction treatment[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(2): 176-180.

参考文献

[1] Birnie D.The damon passive self-ligating appliance system[J]. Semin Orthod, 2008, 14(1): 19-35.
[2] Atik E, Ciger S.An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in Class I maxillary constriction patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2014, 84(4): 615-622.
[3] Fleming PS, Lee RT, Marinho V, et al.Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013, 144(2): 185-193.
[4] Scott P, Dibiase AT, Sherriff M, et al.Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 134(4): 470-471.
[5] Cattaneo PM, Treccani M, Carlsson K, et al.Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2011, 14(4): 222-233.
[6] Basciftci FA, Akin M, Ileri Z, et al.Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system[J]. Korean J Ortho, 2014, 44(3): 119-127.
[7] Vajaria R, Begole E, Kusnoto B, et al.Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimensional changes using the Damon system[J]. Angle Orthod, 2011, 81(4): 647-652.
[8] Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T.Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007, 132(2): 208-215.
[9] Fleming PS, Lee RT, Mcdonald T, et al.The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: Data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial[J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(1): 1-6.
[10] Franco EM, Valarelli FP, Fernandes JB, et al.Comparative study of torque expression among active and passive self-ligating and conventional brackets [J]. Dental Press J Ortho, 2015, 20(6): 68-74.
[11] Morina E, Keilig L, Jager A, et al.Biomechanical analysis of orthodontic brackets with different closing mechanisms[J]. Biomed Tech (Berl), 2009, 54(2): 89-97.
[12] Atik E, Akarsu-Guven B, Kocadereli I, et al.Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2016, 149(6): 830-837.
[13] Damon D.Introducing the Damon system Ⅱ[J] .Clin Impressions, 1999, 8(2): 2-9.
[14] Bagden A.A conversation: The Damon system questions and answers[J]. Clin Impressions, 2005, 14(1): 4-13.
[15] 陶列, 姚冉, 唐国华, 等. 应用Damon技术矫治上颌牙列拥挤的牙弓测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2008, 17(3): 243-249.
[16] Shellhart WC, Moawad MI, Paterson RL, et al.Lip adaptation to simulated dental arch expansion. Part 1: Reliability and precision of two lip pressure measurement mechanisms[J]. Angle Orthod, 1996, 66(4): 249-254.
[17] Santoro M, NicoIay OF, CangiaIosi TJ. Pseudoelasticity and thermoelasticity of nickel-titanium alloys: a clinically oriented review. Part II: Deactivation forces[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001, 119(6): 594-603.
[18] 王红梅, 王邦康, 白玉兴, 等. 含铜镍钛合金丝口腔温度下三点弯曲性能的研究[J]. 北京口腔医学, 2012, 20(2): 64-66.

非减数治疗中不同托槽对牙弓三维方向的影响

Investigation on the effects of different brackets on the three-dimensional direction of the arch in the non reduction treatment

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄纯, 温馨, 黄乐, 赵宁. 上颌前方牵引对恒牙早期骨性Ⅲ类错上、下颌骨宽度影响的三维模拟分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 550-555.
[2]	毛晓燕, 杨佳音, 李佳, 徐睿. 成人骨性Ⅱ类错畸形上气道与上、下颌骨形态分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 419-423.
[3]	刘明瑾, 李乐, 陈菊芳, 郝鑫, 杨儒, 田玉楼. 舌刺联合头帽颏兜与前方牵引矫治前牙反的疗效比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 429-434.
[4]	徐频频, 林燕, 刘小敏. 浙江丽水畲族、汉族青少年Downs头影测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(5): 509-512.
[5]	周驰, 王旭, 姜虹, 朱也森, 徐辉. 头影测量用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者困难插管预测的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(3): 317-320.
[6]	李佳, 卢淑娟, 李乐, 史娅婕, 陆平, 田玉楼. 前磨牙正锁对下颌骨矢状向位置的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(2): 179-183.
[7]	张薇, 颜传杰, 李俐. Damon自锁矫治系统非拔牙治疗上颌轻中度拥挤的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(6): 610-614.
[8]	张楠, 汪隼, 樊林峰, 成晓敏, 李小新. FRⅢ矫治功能性和早期骨性安氏Ⅲ类错▉的软组织变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(6): 658-661.
[9]	张奇峰, 金莉, 姚华, 李志勇, 黄旭, 王慧明. 正常青少年颅面形态与上气道关系的研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(6): 702-706.
[10]	张楠, 汪隼, 郑为, 陈敏, 沈玉凤, 闫红娟. FRⅢ矫治功能性和早期骨性安氏Ⅲ类错的硬组织变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(6): 725-728.
[11]	曹宇鸣，张媛媛，于默，岳杨，李昂，田玉楼. 舌刺联合头帽颏兜矫治前牙反的头影测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 221-226.
[12]	陈双喜，唐国华，蒋雨楠，顾永佳，章婷，高美琴. 高转矩自锁托槽拔牙矫治上颌前突的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(6): 739-742.
[13]	马嘉, 阎秀林. 双侧下颌支矢状劈开截骨术后咽腔气道的变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(5): 425-428.
[14]	张东平, 刘珺, 刘洋, 孙娜, 伊吉翠. 自锁托槽与传统托槽对非拔牙矫治牙弓宽度影响的meta分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(3): 367-372.
[15]	田玉楼, 朴美玲, 赵震锦, 刘芳, 王晶, 曹宇鸣. 上颌前牙埋伏阻生与矢状骨面型的关系[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(1): 99-102.