Assessment of the reproducibility of occlusal morphology for digital full crown designed by mandibular trajectory data

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2023.01.011

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To metrically assess the reproducibility of mandibular trajectory data and mean frame parameter in guiding the design of occlusal morphology of prosthesis. METHODS: Fifteen subjects with complete dentition were selected, including 6 females and 9 males, with an average age of 22-30 years old. The mandibular trajectory data and mean frame parameter were used to guide the design of occlusal morphology of the prosthesis in the CAD system, then the occlusal morphology was compared to the original natural teeth. The data were statistically analyzed by SPSS 25.0 software package. RESULTS: The general deviation of occlusal morphology between the prosthesis guided by mandibular trajectory data and mean frame parameter with the natural teeth was as follows: mean positive distance was (269.9±63.1) μm, (318.7±51.3) μm; mean negative distance was (-175.8±78.2) μm, (-253.7±65.6) μm; root mean square (RMS) was (267.1±84.9) μm and (304.1±82.2) μm. The vertical distance on mesial buccal cusp was (197.6±86.2) μm and (288.0±79.6) μm,distal buccal cusp was (176.3±85.3) μm and (297.7±63.2) μm, mesial lingual cusp was (171.6±62.4) μm and (246.4±62.8) μm, distal lingual cusp was (166.2±64.6) μm and (232.5±70.7) μm, central fossa was (104.9±42.2) μm and (219.1±69.1) μm. RMS, mean(-) and vertical differences of central fossa and distal buccal cusp were significantly different(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The occlusal morphology of the prosthesis designed under the guidance of mandibular trajectory data and mean frame parameter both have significant differences with natural occlusion, but the deviation guided by mandibular trajectory data is lower.

Key words: Mandibular trajectory, Occlusal morphology, CAD/CAM

CLC Number:

R783.3

XU Xin-rui, YU Run-ping, YUAN Yun, ZHANG Hong-ming, HUANG Hui. Assessment of the reproducibility of occlusal morphology for digital full crown designed by mandibular trajectory data[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 32(1): 58-62.

References

[1] Williams WN, Lapointe LL, Thornby JI.Interdental thickness discrimination by normal subjects[J]. J Dent Res, 1974, 53(6): 1404-1407.
[2] Mörmann WH.The evolution of the CEREC system[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2006, 137(Suppl): 7S-13S.
[3] Koralakunte PR, Aljanakh M. The role of virtual articulator in prosthetic and restorative dentistry[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2014, 8(7): ZE25-ZE28.
[4] Fang JJ, Kuo TH.Modelling of mandibular movement, computers in biology and medicine[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2008, 38(11-12): 1152-1162.
[5] Carossa M, Cavagnetto D, Ceruti P, et al.Individual mandibular movement registration and reproduction using an optoeletronic jaw movement analyzer and a dedicated robot: a dental technique[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1): 271-273.
[6] Hong SJ, Noh K.Setting the sagittal condylar inclination on a virtual articulator by using a facial and intraoral scan of the protrusive interocclusal position: a dental technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 125(3): 392-395.
[7] Quinlan P.Articulators, face bows and interocclusal records[J]. J Ir Dent Assoc, 2016, 62(2): 102-104.
[8] Hsu MR, Driscoll CF, Romberg E, et al.Accuracy of dynamic virtual articulation: trueness and precision[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 28(4): 436-443.
[9] Kalman L, Chrapka J, Joseph Y.Digitizing the facebow: a clinician/technician communication tool[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2016, 29(1): 35-37.
[10] 林宗建, 陆家瑜, 吕成奇, 等. 4D下颌运动轨迹描记仪用于关系转移的精确性初探[J].口腔材料器械杂志, 2019, 28(1): 23-29.
[11] Litzenburger AP, Hickel R, Richter MJ, et al.Fully automatic CAD design of the occlusal morphology of partial crowns compared to dental technicians design[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17(2): 491-496.
[12] Kijak E, Lietz-Kijak D, Fraczak B, et al.Assessment of the TMJ dysfunction using the computerized facebow analysis of selected Parameters[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015: 508069.
[13] Koralakunte PR, Aljanakh M. The role of virtual articulator in prosthetic and restorative dentistry[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2014, 8(7): ZE25-ZE28.
[14] 陈智. 牙修复体的临床评价标准[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2019, 54(9): 612-617.
[15] Tamaki K, Ishigaki S, Ogawa T, et al.Japan Prosthodontic Society position paper on“occlusal discomfort syndrome”[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2016, 60(3): 156-166.
[16] Kollmuss M, Kist S, Goeke JE, et al.Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology,occlusion,and aesthetics[J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2016, 20(4): 791-797.
[17] Li L, Chen H, Li W, et al.The effect of residual dentition on the dynamic adjustment of wear facet morphology on a mandibular first molar crown[J]. J Prosthodont, 2021, 30(4): 351-355.
[18] Litzenburger AP, Hickel R, Richter MJ, et al.Fully automatic CAD design of the occlusal morphology of partial crowns compared to dental technicians’ design[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17(2): 491-496.
[19] Oancea L, Stegaroiu R, Cristache CM.The influence of temporomandibular joint movement parameters on dental morphology[J]. Ann Anat, 2018, 218: 49-58.
[20] Suzuki Y, Shimpo H, Ohkubo C.Occlusal contact of fixed implant prostheses using functional biteimpression technique[J]. Implant Dent, 2015, 24(1): 42-46.
[21] Hassan B, Gimenez Gonzalez B, Tahmaseb A, et al.A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: a pilot clinical study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(4): 486-492.
[22] Diker B, Tak Ö.Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2020, 12(5): 299-306.