Evaluation of the effect of modified wet particle erosion on bond strength between 3Y-TZP zirconia framework and veneering porcelain

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2017.01.006

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of bond strength between 3mol% yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconium polycrystal (3Y-TZP) zirconia framework after modified wet particle erosion and veneering porcelain. METHODS: A total of 174 [8 mm× 8 mm× 3 mm (±0.02)] specimens were prepared and then randomly divided into different groups according to different particle size, sandblasting pressure, sandblasting time through conventional sandblasting (experimental groups); specimens in the control group were not sandblasted. The bond strength between 3Y-TZP zirconia framework and veneering porcelain was measured using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS17.0 software package. The bond strength of specimens treated by two methods-conventional sandblasting and modified wet particle erosion under the same condition (150 μm, 0.6 MPa, 30 s) were acquired, while the surface was analyzed microscopically before the specimens were veneered with the veneering ceramic under scanning electronic microscope (SEM). RESULTS: The bond strength of conventional sandblasting group under the condition (110 μm, 0.4 MPa,30 s) was maximal, and significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05). The bond strength of modified wet particle erosion group was significantly higher than the conventional sandblasting group and control group (P<0.01); SEM showed that the surface of specimen with modified wet particle erosion was homogeneously rough; the surface specimen with conventional sandblasting was heterogeneously rough, some microcracks were seen in some areas. CONCLUSIONS: Sandblasting can slightly enhance the bond strength between 3Y-TZP zirconia framework and veneering porcelain, modified wet particle erosion is recommended for 3Y-TZP zirconia framework surface treatment.

Key words: Zirconia framework, Erosion, Sandblasting, Shear bond strength

CLC Number:

R783.1

GUO Jing, ZHU Jia, LIU Hon-guang, ZHU Hong-shui. Evaluation of the effect of modified wet particle erosion on bond strength between 3Y-TZP zirconia framework and veneering porcelain[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2017, 26(1): 26-31.

References

[1] Teng J, Wang H, Liao Y, et al. Evaluation of a conditioning method to improve core-veneer bond strength of zirconia restorations [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2012, 107(6): 380-387.
[2] Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, et al. Mechanical properties and short-term in vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia [J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1989, 23(1): 45-61.
[3] Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Frictional resistances of metal-lined ceramic brackets versus conventional stainless steel brackets and development of 3-D friction maps[J]. Angle Orthod, 2001, 71(5): 364-374.
[4] 黄伟昊. 氧化锆全瓷冠的临床应用研究进展 [J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2011, 20(4): 199-201.
[5] Roediger M, Gersdorff N, Huels A, et al. Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: four-year clinical results [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2010, 23(2): 141-148.
[6] Tinschert J, Schulze KA, Natt G, et al. Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2008, 21(3): 217-222.
[7] Ortorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE. A 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice [J]. J Dent, 2009, 37(9): 731-736.
[8] Tsumita M, Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, et al. Clinical evaluation of posterior all-ceramic FPDs (Cercon): a prospective clinical pilot study [J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2010, 54(2): 102-105.
[9] Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics[J]. Dent Mater, 2006, 22(9): 857-863.
[10] Oh JW, Song KY, Ahn SG, et al. Effects of core characters and veneering technique on biaxial flexural strength in porcelain fused to metal and porcelain veneered zirconia[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2015, 7(5): 349-357.
[11] Fischer J, Grohmann P, Stawarczyk B. Effect of zirconia surface treatment on the shear strength of zirconia/veneering ceramic composites [J]. Dent Mater J, 2008, 27(3): 448-454.
[12] 隋华超, 付雅丽, 李长义. 表面多孔涂层对氧化锆与饰面瓷界面结合强度的影响[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2013, 14(6): 354-357.
[13] Scherrer SS, Cattani-Lorente M, Vittecoq E, et al. Fatigue behavior in water of Y-TZP zirconia ceramics after abrasion with 30 μm silica-coated alumina particles[J]. Dent Mater, 2011, 27(2): e28-42.
[14] Chen JY, Leng YX, Tian XB, et al. Antithrombogenic investigation of surface energy and optical bandgap and hemocompatibility mechanism of Ti(Ta +5 )0 2 thin films[J]. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(12): 2545-2552.
[15] 钟群, 彭燕, 邬雪颖, 等. 不同表面处理方式对Kavo氧化锆基底与饰瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(3): 300-303.
[16] Wang H, Aboushelib MN, Feilzer AJ. Strength influencing variables on CAD/CAM zirconia frameworks[J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(5): 633-638.
[17] 李诗卓, 董祥林. 材料的冲蚀磨损与微动磨损 [M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1987.
[18] 邵荷生, 曲敬信. 摩擦与磨损[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1992.