Comparison of the ability of four different kinds of nickel-titanium instruments to prepare simulated resin to simulate curved root canal forming

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2024.01.009

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the forming ability of four kinds of nickel-titanium instrument preparation resin for simulated curved root canal. METHODS: A total of 40 single bend resin simulated root canals were randomly divided into 4 groups with 10 in each group. Four kinds of nickel-titanium instruments (ProTaper, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold and Reciproc Blue) were used for root canal preparation, and divided into group A, group B, group C and group D. The preparation time of the four groups was compared, the root canal images before and after preparation were analyzed by computer image analysis software, and the changes of the preparation time, curvature and curvature radius of the four groups were recorded. With the root tip as the center of the circle, the radius of 1-10 mm was selected as concentric circle arcs. The detection points were overlapping root canal intersection points. The resin removal amount and center positioning force of the inner and outer walls of the root canal at different detection points were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 20.0 software package. RESULTS: The root canal preparation time in group A was significant longer than that in group B, C and D(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the curvature and curvature radius of the root canal among the four groups (P>0.05). The removal amount of resin from the root canal wall in group C was significant lower than that in group A, B and D (P<0.05) when the distance from the detection point to the apical foramina was 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 mm, respectively. The removal amount of resin from the outer wall of the root canal in group C was significant lower than that in group A, B and D (P<0.05) when the distance from the detection point to the apical foramina was 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 mm, respectively. The root tip offset of group A from the detection point to the apical hole of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 mm was significant greater than that of group B, C and D(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among the four instruments, ProTaper has the largest apical deviation, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold and Reciproc Blue have better ability of root canal forming.

Key words: Root canal preparation, Machine Ni-Ti instruments, Forming ability, Centering force

CLC Number:

R781.05

LIANG Zhao-huang, ZHANG Yao. Comparison of the ability of four different kinds of nickel-titanium instruments to prepare simulated resin to simulate curved root canal forming[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2024, 33(1): 54-58.

References

[1] Burns LE, Kim J, Wu Y, et al.Outcomes of primary root canal therapy: an updated systematic review of longitudinal clinical studies published between 2003 and 2020[J]. Int Endod J, 2022, 55(7): 714-731.
[2] 孙雨婷, 胡启航, 曹罡, 等. 不同单支锉对于弯曲根管预备效果的研究[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2022, 35(12): 1257-1260.
[3] 谷达玮, 郭锦材. 不同根管预备器械对弯曲根管预备效果的影响[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2021, 38(8): 1028-1032.
[4] 侯本祥. 根管机械预备并发症的原因、预防及处理[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2019, 54(9): 605-611.
[5] 顾永春, 周培刚, 丁月峰, 等. 两种根管弯曲度测量法间数学关系的推导[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2006, 22(4): 542-546.
[6] 顾永春, 仲燕. Schaifer法测量根管弯曲半径准确性的探讨[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2007, 17(3): 129-133.
[7] Hadwa SM, Ghouraba RF, Kabbash IA, et al.Assessment of clinical and radiographic efficiency of manual and pediatric rotary file systems in primary root canal preparation: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2023,23(1):687.
[8] 王月月, 孙莉青, 李宁毅, 等. 3种因素对根管桩道预备后根尖封闭性影响的研究[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2021, 22(2): 81-85.
[9] Kwak SW, Ha JH, Shen Y, et al.Effects of root canal curvature and mechanical properties of nickel-titanium files on torque generation[J]. J Endodont, 2021, 47(9): 1501-1506.
[10] 姚婕, 张付兵. 机用镍钛器械根管预备效果的研究进展[J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2022, 31(2): 117-121.
[11] 陈佳, 张志宏, 刘红红. 机用镍钛器械TFA和Mtwo根管预备效果的比较[J]. 安徽医学, 2020, 41(11): 1349-1351.
[12] Pedullà E, La Rosa GRM, Virgillito C, et al.Cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments according to the angle of file access and radius of root canal[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(3): 431-436.
[13] Pivoto-João MMB, Tanomaru-Filho M, Pinto JC, et al.Root canal preparation and enlargement using thermally treated nickel-titanium rotary systems in curved canals[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(11): 1758-1765.
[14] Htun PH, Ebihara A, Maki K,et al.Cleaning and shaping ability of Gentlefile, HyFlex EDM, and ProTaper next instruments: a combined micro-computed tomographic and scanning electron microscopic study[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(7): 973-979.
[15] 葛晓甜, 宋颖韬, 仪红, 等. 机用单根锉WaveOne Gold与ProTaper Next镍钛器械对重度弯曲根管的预备效果评价[J]. 中国医刊, 2021, 56(3): 325-328.
[16] 王晓彦, 李红文, 傅云婷, 等. 比较研究Reciproc Blue、WaveOne Gold和ProTaper Next三种镍钛器械在模拟弯曲根管内的成形能力[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2020, 34(6): 344-347.
[17] 路瑶, 孟磊, 卢志山, 等. 4种机用镍钛器械预备磨牙根管的临床效果分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志, 2022, 38(10): 597-600.
[18] 陈炯, 黄正蔚, 陈薇敏. 3种镍钛器械对弯曲根管成形能力的实验研究[J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2022, 31(1): 12-15.