A comparative study of silicon rubber impression and intraoral scanning impression in oral clinical teaching

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2020.04.023

Shanghai Journal of Stomatology ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 445-448.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2020.04.023

• Dental Education • Previous Articles

A comparative study of silicon rubber impression and intraoral scanning impression in oral clinical teaching

LIU Jing¹, SUN Xiao-shuai², ZHANG Ruo-tong², WANG Bao¹, WU Chun-lan¹, YE Li-juan¹, YU De-dong¹

1. Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 201999;
2. College & Hospital of Stomatology Anhui Medical University, Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province. Hefei 230032, Anhui Province, China

Received:2019-07-01 Revised:2020-01-19 Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-09-11

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess and compare patient satisfaction and time required between silicon rubber impression and intraoral scanning impression. METHODS: Six undergraduates participated in this study. silicon rubber impression and intraoral scanning impression were taken, the time required to obtain the impressions and the scores of visual analog scale(VAS) were recorded. SPSS 23.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The time and patients satisfaction of silicon rubber impression were better than intraoral scanning impressions, and there were significant differences between the two groups(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using silicon rubber impression, the patient experience is better. To use intraoral scanning impression technology, dentists should be more skilled. With the role-playing method,dental interns can learn the operation key points and precautions of different impression-taking methods even better.

Key words: Silicon rubber impression, Intraoral scanning impressions, Teaching methods

CLC Number:

R783.1

LIU Jing, SUN Xiao-shuai, ZHANG Ruo-tong, WANG Bao, WU Chun-lan, YE Li-juan, YU De-dong. A comparative study of silicon rubber impression and intraoral scanning impression in oral clinical teaching[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2020, 29(4): 445-448.

References

[1] 姚德超. 三维数字化扫描在口腔临床中应用的探究[J].临床研究,2019,27(6):35-37.
[2] 张富强. 数字技术在口腔修复领域的应用与展望[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2016, 51(4):215-218.
[3] Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, et al.Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2014, 14:10.
[4] Burzynski JA, Firestone AR, Beck FM, et al.Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: time and patient satisfaction[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018, 153(4):534-541.
[5] Mangano A, Beretta M, Luongo G, et al.Conventional vs digital impressions: acceptability, treatment comfort and stress among young orthodontic patients[J]. Open Dent J, 2018, 12(Suppl-1,M8):118-124.
[6] Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Kerdijk W, et al.Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: operating time and patient preference[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015,114(3):403-406.
[7] Burhardt L, Livas C, Kerdijk W, et al.Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: a comparative study in young patients[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2016, 150(2):261-267.
[8] 姚贵良, 陈萍, 毛莹莹. 传统印模与口内扫描制作的全瓷冠临床精密性比较[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2018, 3(18):7-9.
[9] Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, et al.Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018,22(3):1253-1262.
[10] Guiraldo RD, Berger SB, Siqueira RM, et al.Surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of molds: influence of disinfectant solutions and elastomeric impression materials[J]. Acta Odontol Latinoam, 2017,30(1):13-18.
[11] Kotha SB, Ramakrishnaiah R, Devang Divakar D, et al.Effect of disinfection and sterilization on the tensile strength, surface roughness, and wettability of elastomers[J]. J Investig Clin Dent,2017,8(4):1-6.
[12] 林惠欢, 唐亮. 椅旁CAD/CAM技术在口腔修复中的应用[J]. 口腔医学, 2019,39(3):275-279.

A comparative study of silicon rubber impression and intraoral scanning impression in oral clinical teaching

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	RUAN Min, JI Tong, ZHANG Chen-ping. Applications of 3D printing technology in teaching of oromaxillofacial head and neck surgical oncology [J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2016, 25(6): 762-765.
[2]	TIAN Zhen, LI Lei, WANG Li-zhen, HU Yu-hua, ZHANG Chun-ye, LI Jiang.. Application of diversified teaching methods to improve the teaching effects in the course of oral histology and pathology [J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2016, 25(1): 121-124.