上海口腔医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 436-439.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2018.04.022

• 口腔医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

Proplan虚拟软件在正颌外科教学中的应用评价

谢福平1, 刘欢欢1, 陈嘉民1, 牛刚1, 林李嵩2,*, 吴烨1,*   

  1. 1.福建医科大学附属口腔医院 口腔颌面外科,福建 福州 350002;
    2.福建医科大学附属第一医院 口腔颌面外科,福建 福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-10 修回日期:2018-04-21 出版日期:2018-08-25 发布日期:2018-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 吴烨, E-mail:1713746079@qq.com;林李嵩,E-mail:dr_lls@163.com。*共同通信作者
  • 作者简介:谢福平(1985-),男,硕士,主治医师,E-mail:1713746079@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    福建省卫生系统中青年骨干人才培养项目(2015-ZQN-ZD-27); 福建省教育厅基金(JA11125,JAS151275); 福建省自然科学基金(2014J01316)

Evaluation of using Proplan virtual software in teaching of orthognathic surgery

XIE Fu-ping1, LIU Huan-huan1, CHEN Jia-min1, NIU Gang1, LIN Li-song2, WU Ye1   

  1. 1.Department of Stomatology,School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University. Fuzhou 350002;
    2.Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Fuzhou 350002, Fujian Province, China
  • Received:2018-03-10 Revised:2018-04-21 Online:2018-08-25 Published:2018-10-09

摘要: 目的: 利用Proplan虚拟软件构建正颌外科虚拟教学平台,以探索高效的正颌外科教学模式。方法: 选择福建医科大学普通本科口腔医学四年级学生100名,随机分为2组,每组50名。利用传统正颌外科教学法和Proplan虚拟软件教学法,分别对2组学生进行教学;设计正颌外科相关试卷测验2组学生,评估2组学生对正颌外科的了解程度;然后2组学生交换教学方法,对所有学生进行问卷调查,统计学生对2种教学方法的接受度。采用SPSS11.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 实验组测验得分为47.26±4.44,对照组为43.92±3.18,两组得分具有显著差异(P<0.01)。2组学生对正颌外科虚拟教学方法的接收程度也高于传统教学方法,差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。结论: Proplan虚拟软件教学提高了正颌外科教学效率,学生易于接受,值得推广。

关键词: Proplan虚拟软件, 虚拟教学, 正颌外科

Abstract: PURPOSE: Using Proplan virtual software to construct a virtual teaching platform for orthognathic surgery, and to explore an effective teaching model for orthognathic surgery. METHODS: One-hundred grade four students of stomatology in Fujian Medical University were divided into two groups. Traditional orthognathic surgery teaching method and Proplan virtual software teaching method were employed to teach the two groups of students, respectively. Orthognathic-surgery-related paper test was used to evaluate how the two groups of students understand orthognathic surgery; then the students were switched to the other teaching method, respectively. A follow-up questionnaire survey was conducted to further evaluate students' acceptance of the two teaching methods. Finally, a comprehensive statistical analysis was performed for students understanding of orthognathic surgery using SPSS 11.0 software package. RESULTS: According to the test scores, students in the experimental group scored higher than the control group, the difference was significant (P<0.01). The acceptance of different teaching methods displayed remarkable difference between the two groups. Token together, our finding showed that virtual model surgery teaching was an easier teaching method for students to understand and accept. CONCLUSIONS: Proplan virtual software teaching improves the teaching efficiency of orthognathic surgery and deserves further promotion.

Key words: Proplan virtual software, Virtual teaching, Orthognathic surgery

中图分类号: