流动性复合树脂核材料在短时超高光强照射下的聚合效果

上海口腔医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 261-265.

流动性复合树脂核材料在短时超高光强照射下的聚合效果

何少伟, 耿藤瑜, 孟翔峰

南京市口腔医院·南京大学医学院附属口腔医院修复科,江苏南京 210008

收稿日期:2015-08-20 修回日期:2015-09-28 出版日期:2016-06-25 发布日期:2016-07-22
通讯作者: 孟翔峰,Tel：025-83620263,E-mail：mengsoar@nju.edu.cn E-mail:swhnanda@163.com
作者简介:何少伟（1988-）,男,医师,在读硕士研究生
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(81470781); 江苏省自然科学基金(BK20141082); 南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK2125)

Polymerization of flowable composite core materials irradiated by super-high intensity light with short time

HE Shao-wei, GENG Teng-yu, MENG Xiang-feng

Department of Prosthodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital &
Stomatological Hospital Affiliated to Medical School, Nanjing University. Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China

Received:2015-08-20 Revised:2015-09-28 Online:2016-06-25 Published:2016-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评估流动性双重固化复合树脂核材料在短时超高强度照射下的聚合效果。方法将双重固化流动性复合树脂核材料（regular dentine, Para core）注满单端开口的长方体形不透光硅橡胶模具中,将光固化灯紧贴开口端,以1000 mW/cm²持续照射10、20 s或以3200 mW/cm²持续照射3、6 s。试件避光保存1 h后取出,测量试件纵断面距照射光源1~10 mm间,以1 mm为间隔共10个深度的努氏显微硬度以判断聚合效果。试件继续避光保存24 h后,重复上述测量。采用SPSS 16.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果除3200 mW/cm²、3 s光照射条件无法引发光固化反应外,在其余光照射条件下,试件在光影响深度内的硬度值在光照后24 h都显著高于单纯化学固化产生的硬度值,但光照射对试件的影响深度有限。在试件的光影响深度内,随着光照射时间的延长,试件的硬度值得到显著提高;而试件在3200 mW/cm²、6 s和 1000 mW/cm²、20 s条件下光照射后24 h的硬度值无显著差异。结论 3200 mW/cm²光强度照射时间必须延长到6 s,才能保证引发流动性复合树脂核材料的光固化反应,并获得合适的聚合效果。

关键词: 光强度, 照射时间, 流动性, 复合树脂核, 显微硬度

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the polymerization of dual-cured flowable composite core irradiated by super-high intensity light with short time. METHODS: The light-proof silicon rubber cuboid mold with one end open was syringed and filled by dual-cured flowable resin composite core, then the open end of mold was irradiated directly by a light unit at 1000 mW/cm² ×10, ×20 s; or at 3200 mW/cm² × 3, ×6 s. The specimens were stored in the light-proof box. After irradiation for 1 h and 24 h, Knoop microhardness was measured along the vertical surfaces of specimens from 1mm to 10 mm depth at 1 mm interval. The data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA with SPSS 16.0 software package. RESULTS: 3200 mW/cm² ×3 s light irradiation did not initiate light curing of the specimens. The other three light irradiations could make specimens obtaining higher microhardness than that by pure chemical cure; however, the depth of specimens affected by light irradiation was limited. Within the area affected by light, the microhardness of specimens could be improved by increasing the light irradiation time; after irradiation for 24 h, the microhardness of specimens had no difference between 3200 mW/cm² ×6 s and 1000 mW/cm² ×20 s light irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: 3200 mW/cm² light intensity should be used for irradiation at least for 6 s, which could initiate light curing of flowable composite core to sufficient polymerization.

Key words: Light intensity, Irradiation time, Flowable, Composite core, Microhardness

中图分类号:

R783.1

何少伟, 耿藤瑜, 孟翔峰. 流动性复合树脂核材料在短时超高光强照射下的聚合效果[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(3): 261-265.

HE Shao-wei, GENG Teng-yu, MENG Xiang-feng. Polymerization of flowable composite core materials irradiated by super-high intensity light with short time[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2016, 25(3): 261-265.

参考文献

[1] Ding H, Meng X, Luo X. Hardness gradients of dual-polymerized flowable composite resins in simulated root canals [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(5): 1231-1237.
[2] 丁虹, 兰卫东, 孟翔峰. 自黏接树脂水门汀在模拟根管内的硬度变化 [J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2012, 30(3): 243-246.
[3] Meng X, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Influence of ceramic thickness on mechanical properties and polymer structure of dual-cured resin luting agents [J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(5): 594-599.
[4] Komori PC, de Paula AB, Martin AA, et al. Effect of light energy density on conversion degree and hardness of dual-cured resin cement [J]. Oper Dent, 2010, 35(1): 120-124.
[5] Reges RV, Moraes RR, Correr AB, et al. In-depth polymerization of dual-cured resin cement assessed by hardness[J]. J Biomater Appl, 2008, 23(1): 85-96.
[6] 许晓冬, 孟翔峰, 聂蓉蓉. 光源距离对6种LED固化灯光强度衰减的影响[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2014, 24(11): 665-667.
[7] Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal [J]. J Endod, 2007, 33(4): 391-398.
[8] Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G, et al. Monoblocks in root canals: a finite elemental stress analysis study[J]. Int Endod J, 2011, 44(9): 817-826.
[9] Horie K, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, et al. Influences of composite-composite join on light transmission characteristics of layered resin composites [J]. Dent Mater, 2012, 28(2): 204-211.
[10] Pilo R, Cardash HS. Post-irradiation polymerization of different anterior and posterior light-activated resin composites[J]. Dent Mater, 1992, 8(5): 299-304.
[11] Leung RL, Fan PL, Johnston WM. Post-irradiation polymerization of visible light-activated composite resin[J]. J Dent Res, 1983, 62(3): 363-365.
[12] Meng X, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Hardness development of dual-cured resin cements through different thickness of ceramics[J]. Dent Mater J, 2006, 25(1): 132-137.
[13] Musanje L, Darvell B. Polymerization of resin composite restorative materials: exposure reciprocity[J]. Dent Mater, 2003, 19(6): 531-541.
[14] Rahiotis C, Kakaboura A, Loukidis M, et al, Curing efficiency of various types of light-curing units[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2004, 112(1): 89-94.