3种机用镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的成形能力比较

上海口腔医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 191-194.

3种机用镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的成形能力比较

仇宁，王楚瑜，刘宇飞，于小青，薛明

中国医科大学口腔医学院牙体牙髓病科,辽宁沈阳 110002

收稿日期:2015-05-29 修回日期:2015-09-16 出版日期:2016-03-25 发布日期:2016-05-06
作者简介:仇宁(1990-),女,硕士研究生,E-mail: 531354905@qq.com 薛明,Tel(Fax):024-22895932, E-mail: alex_xm@sina.com

Comparison of the shaping ability of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals

QIU Ning, WANG Chu-yu, LIU Yu-fei, YU Xiao-qing, XUE Ming

Department of Endodontics, School of Stomatology, China Medical University. Shenyang 110002, Liaoning Province, China.

Received:2015-05-29 Revised:2015-09-16 Online:2016-03-25 Published:2016-05-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:比较3种机用镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的成形效果。方法:30个树脂根管随机分为3组并编号(Protaper Universal,ProTaper Next及TF Adaptive)。按厂家推荐方法预备,记录预备时间。预备前、后的树脂根管使用单反相机拍照并通过计算机软件重叠,测量距根尖孔不同位置的树脂去除量,从而得出器械偏移情况和中心定位能力。采用SPSS13.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:预备过程中未发生器械折断。ProTaper Next预备时间最短(P<0.05)。在根尖区,TF Adaptive的偏移量最小,其次是ProTaper Next (P<0.05)。在弯曲点冠方,3组偏移量无显著差异 (P>0.05)。结论:ProTaper Next预备效率最高,ProTaper Next和TF Adaptive表现出良好的成形能力,3种机用镍钛器械均能较好地维持根管原始走向。

关键词: 成形能力, 根尖偏移, ProTaper Next, TF Adaptive

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the shaping ability of three rotary Ni-Ti instruments in simulated root canals. METHODS: A total of 30 simulated resin blocks were divided randomly into 3 groups: ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next and TF Adaptive. Each group consisted of 10 root canals. The preparation time and changes in canal curvature were measured. Pre- and post-instrumentation photograghs were taken by precise camera and superimposed through Photoshop. The material removed from the inner and outer canal walls at 9 points beginning at 0 mm from the foramen were measured with Image Pro Plus. Centering ability was determined accordingly. The data was analyzed with SPSS13.0 software package. RESULTS: During root canal preparation, no instruments fractured. ProTaper Next was much faster than ProTaper Universal(P<0.05). At the apical curvature, transportation was the least with TF Adaptive, followed by Protaper Next (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in 3 groups with respect to coronal curvature transportation (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, ProTaper Next was the most efficient instrument. TF Adaptive and Protaper Next showed better shaping ability. In general, all the instruments respected original canal curvature well and were safe to be used.

Key words: Shaping ability, Apical transportation, ProTaper Next, TF Adaptive

中图分类号:

R781.05

仇宁，王楚瑜，刘宇飞，于小青，薛明. 3种机用镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的成形能力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 191-194.

QIU Ning, WANG Chu-yu, LIU Yu-fei, YU Xiao-qing, XUE Ming. Comparison of the shaping ability of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2016, 25(2): 191-194.

参考文献

邵彤菲, 侯晓玫, 侯本祥. 往复运动镍钛锉根管预备成形能力的体外研究 . 华西口腔医学杂志, 2014, 32(6): 606-610.
Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971, 32(2): 271-275.
Yang GB, Zhou XD, Zheng YL, et al. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in curved root canals of extracted teeth . Int Endod J, 2007, 40(9): 707-714.
仇宁. 镍钛根管预备器械研究进展 . 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2015, 8(5): 316-319.
段艳艳, 胡宁, 江喆, 等. 4种机用镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的效果评价 . 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(3): 279-282.
Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijima M, et al. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments . J Endod, 2009, 35(11): 1589-1593.
Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means . Endod Topics, 2005, 10(1): 30-76.
Gambarini G, Testarelli L, De Luca M, et al. The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol (Roma), 2013, 4(1): 152-155.
Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, et al. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography . Int Endod J, 2014, 48(2): 162-170.
Park SY, Cheung GS, Yum J, et al. Dynamic torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod , 2010, 36(7): 1200-1204.
Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, et al. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: reciproc versus waveone. J Endod, 2012, 38(4): 541-544.
Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I. Effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings . J Endod, 2000, 27(2): 210-216.
杨利杰. 根管成形评价方法的研究进展. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(5): 562- 565.
Ersev H, Yilmaz B, ■ E, et al. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 109(5): 86-93

[1]	封菲, 曹立群, 张旗. XP-endo Shaper和ProTaper Next对弯曲根管成形能力及微裂纹形成的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 225-229.
[2]	杨笑晗, 杨旭. 3种往复旋转单支镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的效果比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 595-598.
[3]	孟丹婕, 姚莉莉, 李矛. 3种机用镍钛锉对磨牙根管弯曲度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(4): 407-410.