根管预备尺寸对Er:YAG激光消毒效果的影响

上海口腔医学 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 645-651.

根管预备尺寸对Er:YAG激光消毒效果的影响

许雪松，朱亚琴

上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院?口腔医学院口腔综合科，上海市口腔医学重点实验室，上海200011

收稿日期:2015-01-09 出版日期:2015-12-25 发布日期:2016-01-04
通讯作者: 朱亚琴，Tel:021-23271699-5542，E-mail:zyq1590@163.com E-mail:cedar_xu@126.com
作者简介:许雪松1981-，男，硕士研究生
基金资助:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271134).

Influence of the root canal instrumentation size on the disinfection of intracanal microbe by Er:YAG laser

XU Xue-Song, ZHU Ya-qin.

Department of General Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine;
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2015-01-09 Online:2015-12-25 Published:2016-01-04
Contact: 国家自然科学基金（81271134） E-mail:cedar_xu@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较Er:YAG激光在不同根管预备尺寸情况下的消毒效果。方法 368颗离体上颌单直根管前牙，随机分为8组，机用K3镍钛锉预备至以下尺寸: A1组和B1组（#25/0.06）、A2组和B2组（#30/0.06）、A3组和B3组（#35/0.06）、A4组和B4组（#40/0.06）。高压灭菌后，A组接种粪肠球菌，B组接种白念菌。每组冲洗方法均为Er:YAG激光+3% NaOCl，Er:YAG激光+17% EDTA，Er:YAG激光+生理盐水，然后收集各组处理后根管壁表面微生物样本，进行微生物培养和计数，采用GraphPad Prism 5.02软件包分析各组绝对残留菌落数及菌落相对残留率。结果 Er:YAG激光对粪肠球菌与白念菌的消毒效果在预备尺寸为#40/0.06最佳，#35/0.06次之。#40/0.06、#35/0.06的消毒效果与#30/0.06、#25/0.06相比，差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论在#25/0.06～#40/0.06根管尺寸范围内，Er:YAG激光联合3% NaOCl、17% EDTA和生理盐水冲洗上颌前牙单直根管时，根管预备尺寸不应小于#30/0.06。

关键词: Er:YAG激光, 根管冲洗, 根管尺寸, 粪肠球菌, 白念菌

Abstract: PURPOSE To evaluate the influence of different root canal instrumentation size on disinfection of intracanal microbe of dental root canal. METHODS 368 extracted human anterior teeth with single straight root were randomly divided into 8 groups of 46 roots in each. They were instrumented with K3 Ni-Ti files as follows: group A1 and group B1(#25/0.06), group A2 and group B2(#30/0.06), group A3 and group B3(#35/0.06), group A4 and group B4(#40/0.06). After being prepared and sterilized by autoclaving, group A was inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis, and group B was inoculated with Candida albicans. All groups were irrigated with Er:YAG laser combination of 3% NaOCl, 17% EDTA and 0.9% saline, and then the numbers of microbe on the surface of root canal walls were counted after the treatment, the absolute reduction of counting colony forming units(CFUs) and the relative residual rate of CFUs in the individual group was determined. The Date was analyzed with GraphPad Prism 5.02 software package by one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS Levels of disinfection on E.faecalis and C.albicans increased when root canals were enlarged; #40/0.06 showed the best disinfection, #35/0.06 showed a significantly better disinfection than #30/0.06 and #25/0.06. Substantial reduction of microbe was obtained in #35/0.06 and #40/0.06 compared with #25/0.06 and #30/0.06(P＜0.05).CONCLUSIONS Within the root canal size of #25/0.06-#40/0.06, under the conditions of Er:YAG laser combination of 3% NaOCl, 17% EDTA and 0.9% saline, it was concluded that the reduction of E.faecalis and C.albicans of the anterior straight root canals could be predicted by increasing the root canal instrumentation size large than #30/0.06.

Key words: Er:YAG laser, Root canal irrigation, Instrumentation size, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans

中图分类号:

R781.05

引用本文

许雪松，朱亚琴. 根管预备尺寸对Er:YAG激光消毒效果的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(6): 645-651.

XU Xue-Song, ZHU Ya-qin.. Influence of the root canal instrumentation size on the disinfection of intracanal microbe by Er:YAG laser[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2015, 24(6): 645-651.

使用本文

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.sjos.cn/CN/

https://www.sjos.cn/CN/Y2015/V24/I6/645

参考文献

[1] Peters OA, Schonenberger K, Laib A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography [J]. Int Endod J, 2001, 34(3): 221-230.
[2] Skucaite N, Peciuliene V, Vitkauskiene A, et al. Susceptibility of endodontic pathogens to antibiotics in patients with symptomatic apical periodontitis [J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(10): 1611-1616.
[3] Ballal V, Kundabala M, Acharya S, et al. Antimicrobial action of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine and their combination on endodontic pathogens [J]. Aust Dent J, 2007, 52(2): 118-121.
[4] Matsumoto H, Yoshimine Y, Akamine A. Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er: YAG laser within a root canal model [J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(6): 839-843.
[5] DiVito E, Lloyd A. ER:YAG laser for 3-dimensional debridement of canal systems: use of photon-induced photoacoustic streaming [J]. Dent Today, 2012, 31(11): 122, 124-127.
[6] George R, Meyers IA, Walsh LJ. Laser activation of endodontic irrigants with improved conical laser fiber tips for removing smear layer in the apical third of the root canal[J]. J Endod,2008,34(12): 1524-1527.
[7] Macedo RG, Wesselink PR, Zaccheo F, et al. Reaction rate of NaOCl in contact with bovine dentine: effect of activation, exposure time, concentration and pH[J]. Int Endod J,2010,43(12): 1108-1115.
[8] Noiri Y, Katsumoto T, Azakami H, et al. Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation on biofilm-forming bacteria associated with endodontic pathogens in vitro[J]. J Endod, 2008, 34(7): 826-829.
[9] Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, et al. Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming [J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(7): 1008-1012.
[10] DiVito E, Peters OA, Olivi G. Effectiveness of the erbium: YAG laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation [J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2012, 27(2): 273-280.
[11] Gomes BP, Montagner F, Berber VB, et al. Antimicrobial action of intracanal medicaments on the external root surface [J]. J Dent, 2009, 37(1): 76-81.
[12] Waltimo TM, Sen BH, Meurman JH, et al. Yeasts in apical periodontitis [J]. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 2003, 14(2): 128-137.
[13] Kovac J, Kovac D, Slobodnikova L, et al. Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans in the dental root canal and periapical infections [J]. Bratisl lek listy, 2013, 114(12): 716-720.

相关文章 15

[1] 张英豪, 赵宁, 赵爱杰, 朱超. Er:YAG激光与涡轮手机去骨拔除下颌低位水平阻生智牙的效果比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 75-79.

[2] 朱红, 魏萌, 刘攀, 袁璐, 张研楠, 陈剑锋. 不同频率铒激光对氧化锆陶瓷粘接性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 460-465.

[3] 涂慧娟, 李凌宇, 李医丹, 罗真兰, 俞明. Er:YAG激光联合引导骨再生治疗种植体周围炎伴骨缺损效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 418-422.

[4] 单晓阳, 孙莉青, 王月月, 杨楠, 孙慧斌. 微创开髓下3种根管消毒方法对粪肠球菌清除效果比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 17-23.

[5] 吴昱卓, 周艳, 梅幼敏, 宦泓, 孙敬伟. Er:YAG激光治疗II度根分叉病变牙周炎患者的临床疗效评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 308-311.

[6] 陆佳萍, 黄正蔚, 钱文昊. 根管负压冲洗对根尖推出物及根管内粪肠球菌的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 601-604.

[7] 汪嘉, 赵申, 冉淑君, 孙喆, 梁景平. 不同根管冲洗方式对粪肠球菌生物膜清除效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(3): 246-250.

[8] 吴凯悦, 许春姣, 池毓坦, 孙晓娟, 王宏峰, 王苗苗. Er:YAG激光治疗慢性牙周炎对龈沟液中Dickkopf-1水平和ALP活性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(3): 285-289.

[9] 孙楚文, 朱亚琴. 不同根管消毒方法对粪肠球菌清除作用的体外研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(2): 134-138.

[10] 王昊明, 周梦琪, 洪瑾. Er:YAG激光对犬根尖周组织影响的组织学评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(6): 657-662.

[11] 周梦琪, 王昊明, 肖家祁, 洪瑾. Er:YAG激光联合次氯酸钠对管间峡区的清理作用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(5): 532-537.

[12] 张富华，李矛，韦智君，赵兵. 纳米银颗粒联合氢氧化钙对饥饿期粪肠球菌生物膜的作用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(1): 11-15.

[13] 何智妍, 程岚, 王玉霞, 黄正蔚. 粪肠球菌luxS基因缺陷菌株的构建[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(4): 410-414.

[14] 李律,孟贺,李金源,吴文慧,梁锐英. 中药-壳聚糖混合物对白念菌的抑菌效果及作为义齿稳固剂的可行性[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(2): 188-192.

[15] 孔方圆, 郑元俐, 李静. 添加纳米聚磷腈对聚氨酯材料微生物黏附性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(4): 419-422.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

摘要

本文评价

摘要

参考文献

相关文章

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

回顶部