下颌第一磨牙分根后单冠与联冠修复的有限元分析

上海口腔医学 ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 393-398.

下颌第一磨牙分根后单冠与联冠修复的有限元分析

王桃，李可，邱晓霞，周琳，莫三心

(郑州大学第四附属医院口腔修复科，河南郑州 450002)

收稿日期:2013-01-18 修回日期:2013-03-22 出版日期:2013-08-10 发布日期:2013-08-10
通讯作者: 莫三心，E-mail:bohuishun12@163.com
作者简介:王桃(1970-)，女，硕士，副主任医师，E-mail:zzwangtao2005@sina.com
基金资助:
河南省教育厅科学技术研究重点项目(13A320640)

Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of mandibular first molar with single and combined crowns after separation prosthodontic therapy

WANG Tao, LI Ke, QIU Xiao-xia, ZHOU Lin, MO San-xin

Department of Prosthodontics, College of Stomatology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Zhengzhou 450052, Henan Province, China

Received:2013-01-18 Revised:2013-03-22 Online:2013-08-10 Published:2013-08-10
Supported by:
Supported by Key Research Project of Science and Technology from the Bureau of Education of Henan Province (13A320640).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究下颌第一磨牙分根后2种修复方式对磨牙应力分布的影响。方法：利用锥形束CT(CBCT)扫描和Mimics、Geomagic、UG处理图像，建立下颌第一磨牙分根术后单冠和联冠修复的三维有限元模型。分别进行垂直和斜向加载，计算正常下颌第一磨牙及2种修复方式下牙体和牙周组织的应力。结果：垂直载荷时，2种修复模型与正常磨牙牙体、牙周应力分布相似；牙体应力极值和牙周膜最大主应力值均增加，单冠模型增幅较大。斜向载荷时，联冠模型与正常磨牙牙体、牙周应力分布相似，单冠模型远中根及牙周膜颊侧根下半部应力集中区增大；牙体应力极值和牙周膜最大主应力值均增加，单冠模型增幅较大。结论：下颌第一磨牙分根术后选择联冠修复更为合理。

关键词: 分根术, 三维有限元, 单冠, 联冠, 下颌第一磨牙

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of two kinds of fixed prosthesis on the stress of the mandibular first molar with separation prosthodontic therapy. METHODS: A 3-D finite element model of the mandibular first molar was established with single and combined crowns and their supporting tissues by means of cone-beam CT (CBCT) scanning technology and software Mimics, Geomagic, UG of image processing program. Under dispersed vertical load and dispersed oblique load, the stresses of dental tissues and periodontium were obtained and analysed. RESULTS: When dispersed vertical load was applied, the dental and periodontal stress distribution of two models were similar to the normal. The dental stress value and maximum tensile stress of the periodontal membrane increased and changed greatly in the single crown. When dispersed oblique load was applied, the model of combined crown was similar to the normal. The stress concentrated area expanded in the distal root of the single crown model and the buccal bottom half of the periodontium. The dental stress value and maximum tensile stress of the periodontal membrane increased and changed greatly in the single crown. CONCLUSIONS: The combined crown is a better choice for restoration of mandibular first molar after separation prosthodontic therapy.

Key words: Separating root, Three-dimensional finite element method, Single crown, Combined crowns, Mandibular first molar

中图分类号:

R783.4

王桃, 李可, 邱晓霞, 周琳, 莫三心. 下颌第一磨牙分根后单冠与联冠修复的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(4): 393-398.

WANG Tao, LI Ke, QIU Xiao-xia, ZHOU Lin, MO San-xin. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of mandibular first molar with single and combined crowns after separation prosthodontic therapy[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2013, 22(4): 393-398.

参考文献

[1] Kurtzman GM, Silverstein LH, Shatz PC. Hemisection as an alternative treatment for vertically fractured mandibular molars[J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2006, 27(2): 126-129.
[2] Chang KH, Magdum S, Khera SC, et al. An advanced approach for computer modeling and prototyping of the human tooth[J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2003, 31(5): 621-631.
[3] Poppe M, Bourauel C, J?ger A. Determination of the elasticity parameters of the human periodontal ligament and the location of the center of resistance of single-rooted teeth a study of autopsy specimens and their conversion into finite element models[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2002, 63(5): 358-370.
[4] 陈洪京, 徐绍珍. 利用三维有限元方法分析种植体与天然牙联冠修复的应力分布[J]. 河北省科学院学报, 2005, 22(4): 19-22.
[5] Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado MR, et al. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration[J]. Dent Mater, 2004, 20(6): 554-564.
[6] 曹采方. 牙周病学[M]. 第3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2003: 144.
[7] Hürzeler MB, Strub JR. Combined therapy for teeth with furcation involvement used as abutments for fixed restorations[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 1990, 3(5): 470-476.
[8] 刘蔚, 王美青. 下颌第一恒磨牙咬合应力分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2010, 26(5): 646-649.
[9] 曾艳, 王嘉德. 下颌第一恒磨牙三维有限元模型的建立及应力分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2005, 40(5): 394-397.
[10] Kinney JH, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The mechanical properties of human dentin: a critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature[J]. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med,2003, 14(1): 13-29.
[11] 于世凤. 口腔组织病理学[M]. 第5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2003: 76-85.
[12] Ralph WJ. Tensile behavior of the periodontal ligament[J]. J Periodontal Res, 1982, 17(4): 423-426.
[13] 刘玉艳, 储顺礼, 周延民, 等. 分根术联合桩核联冠修复治疗下颌第一磨牙根分叉病变的临床观察[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2011，27(4): 569-571.

[1]	王静, 殷金萍, 林华洁, 孙亚丽. 动态载荷下不同方式修复牙重度楔状缺损有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 615-620.
[2]	黄威, 郭凯利, 张晓燕, 冯莹, 冯晓伟, 李向军. 唇裂术后上唇压力对上颌骨发育影响的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(3): 243-246.
[3]	左书玉, 王璇, 吴海威, 张东升. 不同种植体外形设计对上颌窦提升术后种植体周围应力分布的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(4): 355-358.
[4]	洪煜锐, 李阳, 骆伟燕, 肖丽娟, 高永波. 树脂陶瓷复合材料单冠美学区种植修复的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 262-266.
[5]	吴峥嵘, 左园林, 李朝晖. 自体牙本质颗粒结合富血小板纤维蛋白膜治疗93例下颌第一磨牙根分叉病变效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 213-216.
[6]	张娅, 张翼, 姜琴, 王华桥, 邱靓星, 王超. 弓丝形变对微种植体舌侧内收上前牙影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(2): 117-122.
[7]	罗翠芬, 彭国光, 夏炜, 冯远华, 沈琳, 黄杏香. 上颌结节倾斜种植体联冠桥修复在上颌后牙区骨量不足中的应用效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(2): 170-175.
[8]	韩菡, 许雅芬, 段余峰, 雷勇华. 2种前方牵引装置前牵引唇腭裂患者上颌骨的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(1): 1-6.
[9]	柏黎明, 李国强, 张强, 董晛. 2种支架设计对基牙及相关组织受力的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(4): 431-437.
[10]	高国宁，王国友，宋继武，卢守仪. 下颌第一磨牙面磨耗近中根受力影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 162-171.
[11]	何淞，陈周艳，杨四维，黄跃. 唇舌侧弓丝力学性能差异的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(6): 660-666.
[12]	景捷,曲爱丽,丁晓梅,黑玉娜. 髁突矢状骨折坚固内固定后骨折愈合进程的生物力学分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(2): 164-169.
[13]	陈淼, 方利华, 张青, 游嘉. 下颌骨缺损肋骨移植术后种植设计及生物力学评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(3): 308-311.
[14]	欧阳少波, 王军, 张洪斌, 廖岚, 朱洪水. 不同肩台宽度的下前牙全瓷联冠的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(2): 160-165.
[15]	刘宛鑫, 王旭霞, 张文娟, 董瑞, 陈云, 张君,. 前方牵引矫治器不同力值反作用力的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(5): 498-503.