下颌支矢状骨劈开术数字模型的建立及不同固定方式的稳定性分析

上海口腔医学 ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 241-246.

• 基础研究 • 下一篇

下颌支矢状骨劈开术数字模型的建立及不同固定方式的稳定性分析

殷学民，张君伟，任晓旭，徐国翔，刘啸

(南方医科大学南方医院口腔颌面外科，南方医科大学口腔医学院，广东广州 510515)

收稿日期:2012-11-13 修回日期:2013-01-15 出版日期:2013-06-10 发布日期:2013-06-10
通讯作者: 殷学民，020-61642022，E-mail：yinxm@fimmu.com
作者简介:殷学民(1965-)，男，博士，教授，硕士研究生导师
基金资助:
广东省自然科学基金(S2011010003872); 广州市科技计划项目(7421165457455)

The establishment of digital model about sagittal split ramus osteotomy and stability analysis of 3 different fixation methods

YIN Xue-min, ZHANG Jun-wei, REN Xiao-xu, XU Guo-xiang, LIU Xiao

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nanfang Hospital; College of Stomatology, Southern Medical University. Guangzhou 510515， Guangdong Province, China

Received:2012-11-13 Revised:2013-01-15 Online:2013-06-10 Published:2013-06-10
Supported by:
Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (S2011010003872) and Science and Technology Projects of Guangzhou City (7421165457455).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：建立下颌支矢状骨劈开术数字模型，探讨3种不同固定方式的应力及位移改变。方法：CT扫描数据导入三维重建软件Mimics以及Geomagic中，建立下颌骨三维实体模型，并进行矢状劈开、坚固内固定，ANSYS进行网格划分，建立三维有限元模型。边界约束后，进行双侧下颌第一磨牙咬合力(132N)加载。结果：建立了双侧下颌支矢状骨劈开术3种不同固定方式三维有限元模型，获得术前下颌骨及矢状骨劈开后咬合力加载的应力及位移生物力学特点。结论：下颌支矢状骨劈开术倒L形固定应力分布最均匀，劈开处位移最小，与其他2种方式相比，其固定稳定性最佳。

关键词: 下颌支矢状骨劈开, 应力, 位移, 稳定性

Abstract: PURPOSE: To establish the digital model about sagittal split ramus osteotomy and discuss the stress and displacement of 3 different fixation methods. METHODS: Three-dimensional reconstruction software Mimics and Geomagic were used to establish the three-dimensional entity model of mandible, and simulated sagittal split ramus osteotomy and fixation. Three-dimensional finite element model was established by mesh generation through ANSYS. After boundary constraint the occlusal load of 132N on the bilateral lower first molars was applied. RESULTS: Three-dimensional finite element models of sagittal split ramus osteotomy and 3 different fixation methods were established, and the biomechanical character of stress and displacement after occlusal load preoperatively and after splitting mandibles were found. CONCLUSIONS: As the stress distribution tends to uniformity and the displacement at split area is the least one, the fixation by bicortical screws in inverted-L position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy is the stablest of the 3 fixation methods.

Key words: Sagittal split ramus osteotomy, Stress, Displacement, Stability

中图分类号:

R782.1

殷学民, 张君伟, 任晓旭, 徐国翔, 刘啸. 下颌支矢状骨劈开术数字模型的建立及不同固定方式的稳定性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(3): 241-246.

YIN Xue-min, ZHANG Jun-wei, REN Xiao-xu, XU Guo-xiang, LIU Xiao. The establishment of digital model about sagittal split ramus osteotomy and stability analysis of 3 different fixation methods[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2013, 22(3): 241-246.

参考文献

[1] Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Incidence of complications andproblems related to orthognathic surgery: a review of 655 patients[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001, 59(10): 1128-1136.
[2] Maurer P, Knoll WD, Schubert J. Comparative evaluation of two osteosynthesis methods on stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2003, 31(5): 284-289.
[3] Erkmen E, Sim[?]　[s]ek B, Yücel E, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofacial Surg, 2005, 43(2): 97-104.
[4] Harada K, Watanabe M, Ohkura K, et al. Measure of bite force and occlusal contact area before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using a new pressure-sensitive device: a preliminary report[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2000,58(4): 370-374.
[5] Yamashita Y, Otsuka T, Shigematsu M, et al. A long-term comparative study of two rigid internal fixation techniques in terms of masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 40(4): 360-365.
[6] Yamashita Y, Mizuashi K, Shigematsu M, et al. Masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a comparison between miniplate and bicortical screw rigid internal fixation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 36(2): 118-122.
[7] Ozden B, Alkan A, Arici S, et al. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2006, 35(9): 837-841.
[8] Maurer P, Holweg S, Knoll WD, et al. Study by finite element method of the mechanical stress of selected biodegradable osteosynthesis screws in sagittal ramus osteotomy[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002, 40(1): 76-83.
[9] Ribeiro-Junior PD, Magro-Filho O, Shastri KA, et al. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 68(4): 724-730.
[10] Erkmen E, Sim[?]　[s]ek B, Yücel E, et al. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2005,34(5): 551-558.
[11] Aymach Z, Nei H, Kawamura H, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a T-shaped miniplate fixation of a modified sagittal split ramus osteotomy with buccal step, a new technique for mandibular orthognathic surgery[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2011, 111(1): 58-63.
[12] 尹翰文, 林娜, 关键, 等. 双侧下颌支矢状劈开坚固内固定的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(2): 194-198.

[1]	胡宁, 李凤丹, 江银华. 植骨与否对上颌窦底内提升同期种植术临床疗效的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 101-104.
[2]	石俊, 关振群, 王训霞. 种植体黏膜与种植体乳头水平及周围软组织稳定性的关系探讨[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 75-78.
[3]	姜莉萍, 唐镇. 正畸应力变化下牙龈组织α-SMA、Ⅰ型和Ⅲ型胶原变化及龈沟液MMP-2、TIMP-2的表达[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 402-405.
[4]	张颖, 卢锦芬, 张清彬. 改良后牙咬合板治疗颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(2): 210-213.
[5]	田一弘, 刘美希, 张强, 夏晨蕾, 阎潇, 袁晓. 周期性机械应力诱导的自噬抑制caspase通路依赖的成肌细胞凋亡[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 231-236.
[6]	洪煜锐, 李阳, 骆伟燕, 肖丽娟, 高永波. 树脂陶瓷复合材料单冠美学区种植修复的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 262-266.
[7]	刘小灿, 王旭霞, 吴晓晓, 刘悦, 闫召月, 张君. 补骨脂对大鼠正畸后稳定性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(5): 455-459.
[8]	潘文辉, 汤春波. 个性化愈合基台对后牙种植修复患者的疗效及对食物嵌塞症状的改善作用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(4): 422-425.
[9]	嵇国平, 田一宏, 刘美希, 沈莹, 沈刚. 内质网应激关键因子PREK在应力加载下成肌细胞凋亡中的作用及机制[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(3): 259-263.
[10]	程鸣佳, 储沨婷, 沈刚. 不同加载时间周期性张应力对大鼠颅底软骨细胞的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(4): 337-341.
[11]	呼海燕, 高志彪. Egr-1对机械力诱导人牙周膜细胞炎症反应的作用及机制研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(5): 553-559.
[12]	应王君子, 沈舜尧, 李彪, 孙昊, 张天嘉, 王旭东. 唇腭裂患者正颌术后上颌骨短期稳定性的三维分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(3): 345-351.
[13]	高国宁，王国友，宋继武，卢守仪. 下颌第一磨牙面磨耗近中根受力影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 162-171.
[14]	周芹，朱震坤，孙睿男，马跃. 经上颌窦侧壁开窗取出移位入窦腔内种植体1例报告[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(1): 125-128.
[15]	王宇, 唐国华. 牵张力促进BMSCs与VECs共培养体系成骨分化的体外研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(5): 400-404.

下颌支矢状骨劈开术数字模型的建立及不同固定方式的稳定性分析

The establishment of digital model about sagittal split ramus osteotomy and stability analysis of 3 different fixation methods

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价