不同锥度根管锉对根管壁抗折强度的影响

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2020.05.005

上海口腔医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 471-475.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2020.05.005

不同锥度根管锉对根管壁抗折强度的影响

邱晓键¹, 肖善社¹, 谷雪莲^1,*, 朱来宽^2,4,*, 蒋倩^3,4

1.上海理工大学医疗器械与食品学院,上海 200093;
2.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院牙体牙髓病科,3.口腔外科,上海 200011;
4.国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海 200011

收稿日期:2019-11-25 修回日期:2020-03-10 出版日期:2020-10-25 发布日期:2020-11-02
通讯作者: 谷雪莲,E-mail：guxuelian@usst.edu.cn;朱来宽,E-mail：zhulk1997@163.com。^*共同通信作者
作者简介:邱晓键（1997-）,男,学士,E-mail：qxj_9765@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31800816); 上海理工大学医工交叉项目(10-19-308-503); 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院基础研究助推计划(JYZZ038)

Effect of different root canal file tapers on fracture strength of root canal wall

QIU Xiao-jian¹, XIAO Shan-she¹, GU Xue-lian¹, ZHU Lai-kuan^2,4, JIANG Qian^3,4

1. School of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology. Shanghai 200093;
2. Department of Endodontics and Operative Dentistry, 3. Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Collage of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai 200011;
4. National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2019-11-25 Revised:2020-03-10 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2020-11-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：比较不同锥度镍钛根管锉对根管壁抗折强度的影响,并探讨有限元分析在根管治疗中的应用价值。方法：选取24颗离体下颌前磨牙,去除冠部后,随机分为 A、B、C、D 4组。A、C 2组使用0.04锥度Z-K3镍钛锉进行根管预备,B、D 2组使用0.06锥度Z-K3镍钛锉进行根管预备。对根管预备后的C、D 2组进行3次2 mm切片处理。从A、B组中随机选取2个样本,使用micro-CT进行扫描。将扫描模型导入不同软件,进行优化,并建立装配体模型,导入Ansys进行有限元分析。使用万能试验机与加力棒对样本施加100 N的力,直到样本任一处发生折裂,记录断裂载荷并进行对比分析。结果：有限元分析结果显示,0.04、0.06锥度模型的最大应力值分别为138.88 MPa和78.812 MPa。A、B组样本平均断裂载荷分别为490.12 N和501.83 N,C、D组牙切片的最大平均断裂载荷出现在颈部,分别为93.61 N和141.53 N。从颈部,到中部,再到尖部,根管的平均断裂载荷依次减小。结论：对于形态正常的下颌前磨牙,使用0.06锥度的镍钛旋转锉对根管进行处理,得到的根管抗折强度比使用0.04锥度处理更高。三维有限元分析法可以指导在根管治疗中选择合适锥度的锉,以降低根折发生率。

关键词: 镍钛旋转锉, 锥度, 抗折强度, 有限元分析

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the effects of different nickel-titanium rotary tapers on fracture strength of root canal and the application value of finite element analysis in root canal therapy. METHODS: Twenty four mandibular premolars were selected and all crowns were removed. All samples were randomly divided into 4 groups: A, B, C and D. Group A and C were instrumented with Z-K3 nickel titanium file as 0.04 taper for root canal preparation. Group B and D were instrumented with Z-K3 nickel titanium file as 0.06 taper. Group C and D were sliced into 2 mm thick slices 3 times after root canal preparation. Two teeth were selected from group A and group B and scanned with micro-CT. The model was imported into different softwares to optimize. The assembly model was built and imported into ANSYS for finite element analysis. Universal testing machine and force bar were used to apply 100 N force to samples until fracture occurring at any place of tooth sample. The fracture load was recorded and comparative analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The results of finite element analysis showed that the maximum stress of 0.04, 0.06 taper models was 138.88 MPa and 78.812 MPa, respectively. The average fracture load of group A, B was 490.12 N and 501.83 N, respectively. In group C and D, the maximum average fracture load was 93.61 N and 141.53 N, respectively. From the neck to the middle and then to the tip, the average fracture load of root canal decreased in turn. CONCLUSIONS: For normal form mandibular premolars, the fracture strength of the root instrumented with 0.06 taper nickel titanium rotary file was significantly higher than that instrumented with 0.04 taper. Three dimensional finite element analysis could guide dentists to choose a suitable taper file in root canal treatment to reduce the incidence of root fracture.

Key words: Nickel-titanium rotary file, Taper, Fracture strength, Finite element analysis

中图分类号:

R783.1

邱晓键, 肖善社, 谷雪莲, 朱来宽, 蒋倩. 不同锥度根管锉对根管壁抗折强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(5): 471-475.

QIU Xiao-jian, XIAO Shan-she, GU Xue-lian, ZHU Lai-kuan, JIANG Qian. Effect of different root canal file tapers on fracture strength of root canal wall[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2020, 29(5): 471-475.

参考文献

[1] 朱广海. 比较分析多次法根管治疗术与一次性根管治疗术在牙体牙髓病中的疗效[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017, 17(78): 260-262.
[2] 齐小秋. 第3次全国口腔健康流行病学调查报告[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 47.
[3] Adorno CG, Yoshioka T, Suda H.The effect of working length and root canal preparation technique on crack development in the apical root canal wall[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(4): 321-327.
[4] Munari LS, Bowles WR, Fok ASL.Relationship between canal enlargement and fracture load of root dentin sections[J]. Dent Mater, 2019, 35(5): 818-824.
[5] 沈明, 赵开克. 根管治疗在牙体牙髓病治疗中的临床应用研究[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2018, 29(18): 2963-2965.
[6] Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B, et al.The effect of root canal taper on the irrigant flow: evaluation using an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(10): 909-916.
[7] Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, et al.Effects of ProTaper universal, ProTaper next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(9): 1482-1484.
[8] Fuss Z, Lustig J, Tamse A.Prevalence of vertical root fractures in extracted endodontically treated teeth[J]. Int Endod J, 1999, 32(4):283-286.
[9] Gher ME, Dunlap RM, Anderson MH, et al.Clinical survey of fractured teeth[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1987, 114(2):174-177.
[10] 朴俊杰, 廖琪梅, 曹军. 上颌切牙三维有限元模型中多材料属性的设定方法[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2010, 31(7): 25-26.
[11] 王林霞, 苏畅, 王茂夏. 不同设计新型钛合金根管桩修复下颌前磨牙残根的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2017, 25(9): 569-574.
[12] Chang YH, Wang HW, Lin PH.Evaluation of early resin luting cement damage induced by voids around a circular fiber post in a root canal treated premolar by integrating micro-CT, finite element analysis and fatigue testing[J]. Dent Mater, 2018, 34(7): 1082-1088.
[13] Dieter GE.Mechanical metallurgy[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., 1986: 56.
[14] Peyton FA, Mahler DB, Hershenov B.Physical properties of dentin[J]. J Dent Res, 1952, 31(3): 366-370.
[15] Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, et al.3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor[J]. Dent Mater, 2005, 21(8): 709-715.
[16] Krikeli E, Mikrogeorgis G, Lyroudia K.In vitro comparative study of the influence of instrument taper on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: an integrative approach-based analysis[J]. J Endodont, 2018, 44(9):1407-1411.
[17] Çiçek E, Aslan MA, Akkocan O.Comparison of the resistance of teeth instrumented with different nickel-titanium systems to vertical root fracture: an in vitro study[J]. J Endodont, 2015, 41(10):1682-1685.
[18] Capar ID, Altunsoy M, Arslan H, et al.Fracture strength of roots instrumented with self-adjusting file and the ProTaper rotary systems[J]. J Endodont, 2014, 40(4): 551-554.
[19] Zandbiglari T, Davids H, SchaFer E. Influence of instrument taper on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2005, 101(1): 126-131.
[20] Mireku AS, Romberg E, Fouad AF, et al.Vertical fracture of root filled teeth restored with posts: the effects of patient age and dentine thickness[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(3): 218-225.
[21] 李静静. 上颌第二前磨牙早期牙根纵裂根管充填不同材料后的三维有限元分析[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2014.
[22] Murakami N, Wakabayashi N.Finite element contact analysis as a critical technique in dental biomechanics: a review[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2014, 58(2): 92-101.
[23] Singla M, Aggarwal V, Logani A, et al.Comparative evaluation of rotary ProTaper, Profile, and conventional stepback technique on reduction in Enterococcus faecalis colony-forming units and vertical root fracture resistance of root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 109(3): e105-110.

不同锥度根管锉对根管壁抗折强度的影响

Effect of different root canal file tapers on fracture strength of root canal wall

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	毛懿, 陈旭卓, 覃海艺, 甄锦泽, 邱亚汀, 霍亮, 张善勇. 双侧冠突切除对肋骨-肋软骨移植重建颞下颌关节受力影响的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 126-131.
[2]	高远, 陈杰, 王高琦, 李云凯, 卞翠荣. 种植体-基台连接设计对基台与基台螺丝受力影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 481-487.
[3]	左书玉, 王璇, 吴海威, 张东升. 不同种植体外形设计对上颌窦提升术后种植体周围应力分布的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(4): 355-358.
[4]	韩婧, 解东平, 王慧珊, 周子疌, 刘剑楠. 微型钛板与生物可吸收板在下颌骨骨切开术固定中的应力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 237-241.
[5]	吕继新, 于卫强, 佘文君, 翁维民. 不同基牙设计对CAD/CAM全瓷修复体抗折强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 578-580.
[6]	王诗哲, 潘晓岗, 周可拓. 拔牙病例隐形矫治器设计的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(3): 264-267.
[7]	朱远兵, 赖光云, 汪俊. 外力方向对防护牙托性能影响的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(6): 574-578.
[8]	顾美珍, 徐宏鸣, 陈芳, 李晓艳, 蒋钰钢, 李克勇. 不完全腭裂咽腔三维有限元模型的建立[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(6): 591-595.
[9]	勾静雪, 陈瑶, 刘桂红. 上颌第一恒磨牙近中颊根根管宽度和锥度测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(1): 34-38.
[10]	刘菁彧，日孜瓦古力，阿木提，黄庆丰. 2种形态纤维桩修复前磨牙残冠的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 245-247.
[11]	何淞，陈周艳，杨四维，黄跃. 唇舌侧弓丝力学性能差异的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(6): 660-666.
[12]	王玉善,周屹立. 玻璃陶瓷高嵌体和金属全冠修复根管治疗后下颌前磨牙的抗折强度[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(3): 311-314.
[13]	董晶,张哲湛,周国良. 上颌第一磨牙远中移动时牙周膜应力分布的非线性三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(3): 315-320.
[14]	韩丽会,邱晓霞,邢旭娜,蔡留意. 上颌前牙区种植方案中角度设计的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(2): 157-163.
[15]	张珑,逯宜,杨柏松,郭妍,李芳萍. 不同大小MO洞型复合树脂嵌体修复应力分布的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(2): 170-176.