Study of the mandibular changes after treatment of Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion in adolescents

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2022.04.010

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the mandibular and dentoalveolar changes in Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion adolescents after treatment. METHODS: Thirty-six patients treated in our hospital were selected. Twelve skeletal Class Ⅱ division 2 adolescents were served as the experimental group, while 12 skeletal Class Ⅱ division 2 adults were selected as the control group 1, 12 skeletal Class Ⅰ adolescents were selected from those who have undergone fixed orthodontic treatment as the control group 2. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) was taken before and after treatment. The lateral cephalometric radiographs generated from CBCT data were committed to explore the changes of the mandible and dentoalveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment among three groups. Statistic analysis was completed by SPSS 21.0 software package. RESULTS: After orthodontic treatment, the mandibular length (Go-Gn), mandibular ramus height (Co-Go), mandibular protrusion (SNB), mandibular dentoalveolus protrusion (SNId), lower facial height (S-Go, ANS-Me, ANS-Me/N-Me) increased and the fossa of chin decreased significantly in Class Ⅱ division 2 adolescents (P<0.05). The differences of SNB, SNId, ANS-Me/N-Me between Class Ⅱ division 2 and Class Ⅰ adolescents decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The growth potential of the mandible is released after treatment of Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion adolescents, promoting mandibular growth and reconstruction.

Key words: Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion, Closed deep bite, Mandible, Mandibular dentoalveolar bone, Growth and development

CLC Number:

R783.5

ZHOU Ming-zhi, WANG Lin, WANG Liang, WU Ke, QIN Yan-jun, ZHAO Chun-yang. Study of the mandibular changes after treatment of Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion in adolescents[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2022, 31(4): 389-394.

References

[1] Perovic T.The influence of Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusions on the harmony of the human face profile[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2017, 23: 5589-5598.
[2] Kannan S, Saravanan S, Arora N, et al.Treatment of Class Ⅱ division 2 pattern malocclusion using protraction utility arch in a prepubertal patient: a clinical case report[J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2020, 13(4): 416-420.
[3] 吴可, 王林, 于剑南, 等. 上前牙区微种植支抗矫治成人内倾型深覆机制的临床研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2020, 36(6): 944-948.
[4] 宋政律, 钱丽雯, 程鸣佳, 等. 恒牙列安氏Ⅰ、Ⅱ¹、Ⅱ²、Ⅲ类颞下颌关节骨性结构的锥形束CT比较[J].上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(2): 141-147.
[5] Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O'Brien KD, et al. Treatment and stability of Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion in children and adolescents: a systematic review[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012, 142(2): 159-169.
[6] 宋镜明, 赵祝, 宋扬, 等. 安氏Ⅱ类错患者上下颌骨生长发育特点的研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2012, 28(2): 209-213.
[7] Topouzelis N, Markovitsi E, Zafiriadis A.Variation with age of dental cephalometric variables in Class II, division 2 patients[J]. Int Orthod, 2012, 10(1): 110-121.
[8] Uzuner FD, Aslan BI, Dinçer M. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class Ⅰ, Class Ⅱ division 1, or Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2019, 156(2): 248-256.e2.
[9] Li Z, Chen Z, Sun J, et al.Correction of deep overbite by using a modified nance appliance in an adult Class Ⅱ division 2 patient with dehiscence defect[J]. Case Rep Dent, 2018: 9563875-7.
[10] Keski-Nisula K, Keski-Nisula L, Varrela J.Class Ⅱ treatment in early mixed dentition with the eruption guidance appliance: effects and long-term stability[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2020, 42(2): 151-156.
[11] 牛树强, 侯凤春, 张倩倩, 等. Twin-block矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类骨性错后的软、硬组织变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(1): 81-84.
[12] 谷岩. 13名女性自9.5至15.5岁自然生长中下颌骨旋转的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2008, 26(6): 615-617.
[13] 傅民魁. 口腔正畸专科教程[M].北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2007: 23-24.
[14] Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal growth changes in subjects with deepbite[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 140(2): 202-209.
[15] Atik E, Kocadereli I.Treatment of Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion using the Forsus fatigue resistance device and 5-year follow-up[J]. Case Rep Dent, 2016, 2016: 3168312.
[16] Bock NC, Saffar M, Hudel H, et al.Outcome quality and long-term (≥15 years) stability after Class Ⅱ:2 Herbst-multibracket appliance treatment in comparison to untreated Class Ⅰcontrols[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2018, 40(5): 488-495.
[17] Antelo OM, Bósio JA, Saga AY, et al.Class Ⅱ division 2 subdivision malocclusion in an adult patient treated with the Forsus fatigue-resistant device placed unilaterally[J]. Contemp Clin Dent, 2019, 10(2): 385-388.
[18] Condò R, Perugia C, Bartolino M, et al.Analysis of clinical efficacy of interceptive treatment of Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion in a pair of twins through the use of two modified removable appliances[J]. Oral Implantol(Rome), 2010, 3(3): 11-25.
[19] 王卫东, 董苁蓉, 韩维. 改良Twin-block矫治器结合直丝弓技术治疗恒牙早期安氏Ⅱ²错畸形的临床应用[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2015, 31(1): 39-41.
[20] 韦佳黛, 刘建英, 莫水学. 非拔牙矫治成人安氏Ⅱ类2分类颏唇美学分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(7): 695-698.
[21] 范丰燕, 王旭霞, 张君. 安氏Ⅱ类2分类错畸形非拔牙矫治前后颏部形态的变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2011, 20(6): 653-657.