Safe zones of the maxillary posterior area for mini-implant insertion in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusion

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.04.007

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the interradicular spaces between the maxillary second premolar and first molar in adolescents with skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion, so as to obtain scientific knowledge for placing mini-implants. METHODS: Forty four cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT) images were selected, which consisted of 23 males and 21 females (average age, 14.07 years) with skeletal Class II malocclusion. CBCT was used to measure the closest interradicular distance and the shortest distance from cortical bone surface to the narrowest interradicular space apically at 1-mm intervals in 9 axial images from the cementoenamel junction(CEJ). SPSS 20.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the closest interradicular distance and the shortest distance from cortical bone surface to the narrowest interradicular space between the left and right side (P>0.05), and no significant difference was found between males and females (P>0.05); The shortest distance from cortical bone surface to the narrowest interradicular space of the left apical area had positive correlation with SNA angle; The closest interradicular distance became wider toward the apical area,and the average distance of the shortest distance from cortical bone surface to the narrowest interradicular space was over 5mm in all sections. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of interradicular spaces between the maxillary second premolar and first molar of adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusion is learned using CBCT. These data might provide a reference for placing mini-implants.

Key words: Skeletal Class II malocclusion, Adolescents, Mini-implants, Cone-beam computed tomography

CLC Number:

R783.5

LIAO Qian, WANG Yun-ji, ZHANG Wei-yi, ZHOU Di, FAN Xiao-ping. Safe zones of the maxillary posterior area for mini-implant insertion in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusion[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(4): 370-375.

References

[1] Stamenkovic Z, Raickovic V, Ristic V.Changes in soft tissue profile using functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion[J]. Srp Arh Celok Lek, 2015, 143(1-2): 12-15.
[2] 邓海艳, 刘海霞. 影响种植支抗稳定性的因素分析[J].口腔医学, 2013, 33(7): 496-497.
[3] Watanabe H, Deguchi T, Hasegawa M, et al.Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity,insertion angle,bone contact length,and bone density[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2013, 16(1): 44-55.
[4] Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, et al.Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007, 131(4 Suppl): S68-73.
[5] Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, et al.Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 129(6): e7-12.
[6] Yang L, Li F, Cao M, et al.Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 147(6): 725-737.
[7] 曾祥龙, 唐志慧. 矢状骨面型与上气道形态和舌骨位置关系的研究[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2004, 18(3): 231-234.
[8] 余红梅, 罗艳虹, 萨建, 等. 组内相关系数及其软件实现[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2011, 28(5): 497-500.
[9] Rodriguez JC, Suarez F, Chan HL, et al.Implants for orthodontic anchorage: success rates and reasons of failures[J]. Implant Dent, 2014, 23(2): 155-161.
[10] Min KI, Kim SC, Kang KH, et al.Root proximity and cortical bone thickness effects on the success rate of orthodontic micro-implants using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 82(6): 1014-1021.
[11] Baumgaertel S.Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 140(6): 806-811.
[12] Kim SH, Yoon HG, Choi YS, et al.Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 135(5): 635-641.
[13] Garg KK, Gupta M.Assessment of stability of orthodontic mini-implants under orthodontic loading: A computed tomography study[J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2015, 26(3): 237-243.
[14] Kim H, Kim TW.Histologic evaluation of root-surface healing after root contact or approximation[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 139(6): 752-760.
[15] Shan LH, Guo N, Zhou GJ, et al.Finite element analysis of bone stress for miniscrew implant proximal to root under occlusal force and implant loading[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2015, 26(7): 2072-2076.
[16] Yanaguizawa MS, Suzuki SS, Martinez EF, et al.Effects of low-level laser therapy in orthodontic patients on immediate inflammatory response after mini-implants insertion: A preliminary report[J]. Photomed Laser Surg, 2017, 35(1): 57-63.
[17] Lim WH, Lee SK, Wikesjö UM, et al.A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites: implications[J]. Clin Anat, 2007, 20(7): 760-765.
[18] 赵晟楠, 高承志, 杨咪咪, 等. CBCT研究上颌窦形态及其与上颌后牙的关系[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(16): 2680-2682.
[19] Motoyoshi M, Sanuki-Suzuki R, Uchida Y, et al.Maxillary sinus perforation by orthodontic anchor screws[J]. J Oral Sci, 2015, 57(2): 95-100.
[20] 姚宇, 蔡斌, 麦理想, 等. 青少年上颌后牙区微种植钉的植入角度研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(6): 460-465.
[21] Tozlu M, Germeç Cakan D, Ulkur F, et al.Maxillary buccal cortical plate inclination at mini-screw insertion sites[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(5): 868-873.