Comparison of treatment results between implant anchorage and traditional intraoral anchorage in patients with maxillary protrusion

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the treatment effects in patients with maxillary protrusion between implant anchorage and traditional intraoral anchorage. METHODS: Thirty patients with maxillary protrusion treated with bilateral maxillary first premolars extractions and high anchorage were selected. They were randomly divided into implant anchorage group and traditional intraoral anchorage group. Each group had 15 cases. The casts and the cephalograms were obtained before treatment (T1) and after treatment (T2). Three-dimensional model analysis was used to compare the teeth movements between the two groups and cephalometric analysis was used to compare the changes of skeletal and soft tissues. The differences were analyzed with SPSS 17.0 software package. RESULTS: In the implant anchorage group, the upper central incisors were retracted by (6.661±1.328) mm and intruded by (0.129±1.815) mm. In the traditional intraoral anchorage group, the upper central incisors were retracted by (5.788±2.009) mm and extruded by (2.623±1.776) mm. There was no significant difference between the two groups in sagittal movement (P>0.05), but there was significant difference in vertical movement (P<0.05). In the implant anchorage group, the upper first molars were protracted by (0.608±1.045) mm, intruded by (0.608±1.045) mm and moved palatally by (0.477±0.904) mm. In the traditional intraoral anchorage group, the upper first molars were protracted by (1.503±0.945) mm, extruded by (0.072±0.690) mm and moved palatally by (0.883±0.752)mm. There was significant difference between the two groups in sagittal movement and vertical movement (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in horizontal movement(P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the changes of cephalometric measurements of skeletal and soft tissues (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Implant anchorage maybe superior in vertical control of the maxillary incisors and also superior in sagittal and vertical control of the maxillary molars to traditional intraoral anchorage during management of maxillary protrusion.

Key words: Implant Anchorage, Traditional Intraoral anchorage, Maxillary protrusion

CLC Number:

R783.5

MA Ning, LI Wei-ran, CHEN Xiao-hong, ZHENG Xu. Comparison of treatment results between implant anchorage and traditional intraoral anchorage in patients with maxillary protrusion[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2016, 25(4): 475-480.

References

[1] 赵红艳, 姜文茹, 张晔, 等. 横腭杆-Nance弓联合支抗与口外弓增强磨牙支抗的比较[J].实用口腔医学杂志, 2005, 21(6): 733-735.
[2] 霍娜, 段银钟, 张菊菊, 等. 3种不同支抗形式拔牙矫治青少年双颌前突的临床研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2006,22(2):82-84.
[3] Geron S, Shpack N, Kandos S, et al. Anchorage Loss-a multifactorial response [J]. Angle Orthod, 2003, 73(6):730-737.
[4] Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM, et al. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of a skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion[J].J Clin Orthod, 2001, 35(7): 417-422.
[5] Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, et al. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class Ⅱ division 1 patients [J]. Angle Orthod, 2009, 79(2): 240-247.
[6] 寻春雷, 曾祥龙, 王兴. 自攻型微钛钉种植体增强磨牙支抗的临床应用研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2004, 39(6): 505-508.
[7] 李平, 毛靖, 朱声荣, 等. 微型种植体支抗在安氏Ⅰ类双颌前突矫治中的应用研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2007, 23(11): 688-690.
[8] 刘月华, 刘晶, 李强, 等. 种植体与横腭杆支抗对减数正畸患者临床疗效影响的比较[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2009, 44(8): 454-459.
[9] Liu YH, Ding WH, Liu J, et al. Comparison of differences in cephalometric parameters after active orthodontic treatment applying mini-screw implant or transpalatal arches in adult patients with bialveolar dental protrusion[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2009, 36(9): 687-695.
[10] Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Patil S. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 134(6): 803-810.
[11] Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, et al. Treatment effects of mini-implant for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 134(1): 18-29.
[12] 许燕玲, 房兵, 毛丽霞, 等. 种植支抗辅助内收前牙的头影测量研究 [J]. 上海口腔医学, 2008, 17(1): 20-24.