Clinical and radiographic evaluation of simultaneous endosseous implant placements with xenographic bone grafts in bone defect by cone-beam computed tomography

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome and osteogenesis of simultaneous endosseous implant placements with xenographic bone grafts in horizontal bone defect. METHODS: Ten patients underwent simultaneous endosseous implant placements with xenographic bone grafts from January, 2010 to June, 2012. These patients were scanned by cone-beam computed tomography immediately, 3 months and 6 months after operation, respectively. The alveolar ridge thickness were measured in different sites, and the data with normal distribution was analyzed with SPSS17.0 software package. RESULTS: With increase of xenographic bone graft retention time, the difference of osteogenesis of xenographic bone grafts was significantly different (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cone-beam computed tomography can clearly determine the clinical outcome and osteogenesis of simultaneous endosseous implant placements with xenographic bone grafts in horizontal bone defect, which is characterized by good ossification.

Key words: Xenographic bone graft, Horizontal bone defect, Dental implantation, Cone-beam computed tomography

CLC Number:

R782.13

WANG Xing, MENG Jian. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of simultaneous endosseous implant placements with xenographic bone grafts in bone defect by cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2014, 23(1): 66-70.

References

[1] Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1990, 1(1): 33-40.
[2] 张晓, 孙凤, 张峰, 等. 上颌窦底提升自体骨与异种骨移植延期种植的临床疗效评价 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2012, 47(10): 584-587.
[3] Miyamoto Y, Obama T. Dental cone beam computed tomography analyses of postoperative labial bone thickness in maxillary anterior implants: comparing immediate and delayed implant placement [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2011, 31(3): 215-225.
[4] Cho YB, Moon SJ, Chung CH, et al. Resorption of labial bone in maxillary anterior implant[J]. J Adv Prosthodont,2011,3(2):85-89.
[5] 谢苗苗, 赵保东, 王维英, 等. 口腔修复膜材料在牙种植中引导骨再生的效应[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(16): 2911-2915.
[6] 邱立新, 王兴, 林野. 引导骨再生的生物膜技术在种植义齿中的应用研究 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 1998, 33(1): 58-59.
[7] Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2007, 22 (Suppl): 49-70.
[8] 宿玉成. 现代口腔种植学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2004.
[9] Johansson B, Grepe A, Wannfors K. A clinical study of changes in the volume of bone grafts in the atrophic maxilla [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2001, 30(3): 157-161.
[10] Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, et al. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft in animals: a systematic review [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 41(1): 114-120.
[11] Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Pereira LA, et al. Fate of autologous and fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts used for ridge augmentation. A CBCT-based analysis [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(2): 167-173.
[12] Dreiseidler T, Tandon D, Ritter L, et al. Accuracy of a newly developed open-source system for dental implant planning [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012, 27(1): 128-137.
[13] Wang D, Künzel A, Golubovic V, et al. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17(6): 1601-1609.