3-D surface topography of ultrasonic preparation tooth: A pilot study

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the 3-D surface topography of ultrasonically prepared tooth. METHODS: Ten extracted human maxillary premolars were prepared for crowns. A split-tooth model was used to refine the margins: half of the margin was finished with traditional rotary instruments, the other with ultrasonic instruments. The 3-D profiles of the prepared surface were observed under scanning electron microscopy and Talysurf CCI 3000 non-contact 3D profiler, and a quantitative comparison of 3-D surface roughness average(SA) and the surface of skewness(SSK) was conducted with Talymap Gold software. The data were analyzed by independent sample t test using SPSS13.0 software package. RESULTS: The surface finished with ultrasonic instruments exhibited a smoother surface. 3-D surface roughness analysis showed that the SA and SSK of surfaces made by ultrasonic instruments were significantly lower, compared with surfaces produced using conventional rotary instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasonic instruments produce surface in better condition than the conventional rotary instruments.

Key words: Ultrasonic, 3-D surface topography, Tooth preparation

CLC Number:

R783.2

HOU Yong-fu, BIAN Hua-qin, ZHANG Lei, SUN Zhen. 3-D surface topography of ultrasonic preparation tooth: A pilot study[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2016, 25(3): 288-291.

References

[1] Li YQ, Wang H, Wang YJ, et al. Effect of different grit sizes of diamond rotary instruments for tooth preparation on the retention and adaptation of complete coverage restorations[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2012, 107(2): 86-93.
[2] Fernández Díaz Jó Naval Gías L. Rehabilitation of edentulous posterior atrophic mandible: inferior alveolar nerve lateralization by piezotome and immediate implant placement[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 42(4): 521-526.
[3] Reside J, Everett E, Padilla R, et al. In vivo assessment of bone healing following Piezotome ultrasonic instrumentation[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015,17(2): 384-394.
[4] Perisanidis C, Saranteas T, Kostopanagiotou G. Ultrasound-guided combined intermediate and deep cervical plexus nerve block for regional anaesthesia in oral and maxillofacial surgery [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2013, 42(2): 29945724.
[5] Horne P, Bennani V, Chandler N, et al. Ultrasonic margin preparation for fixed prosthodontics: a pilot study[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2012, 24(3): 201-209.
[6] Faus-Matoses I, Sola-Ruiz F. Dental preparation with sonic vs high-speed finishing: analysis of microleakage in bonded veneer restorations [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2014, 16(1): 29-34.
[7] Preis V, Grumser K, Schneider-Feyrer S, et al. The effectiveness of polishing kits: influence on surface roughness of zirconia [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2015, 28(2): 149-151.
[8] 周金阔, 隋磊. 不同旋转器械对基牙牙本质表面粗糙度及显微形貌的影响[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2011, 25(6): 446-449.
[9] 李成贵, 董申. 3D表面粗糙度的测量方法分析 [J]. 航空精密制造技术, 1999, 32(2): 36-40.
[10] 李伯奎, 李年莲, 刘远伟, 等. 表面粗糙度功能参数及其三维量值的实验研究 [J]. 机械设计与制造, 2011,49 (9): 179-181.
[11] 连峰, 张会臣, 庞连云. Ti6Al4V表面纹理制备及其润湿性 [J]. 功能材料, 2011, 24(S3): 464-467.
[12] 连峰, 谭家政, 张会臣. 表面形貌对润湿性及抗附着性能的影响[J]. 功能材料, 2014, 27(2):105-109.
[13] Ayad MF. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations[J]. J Prosthodont, 2009, 18(2): 145-151.
[14] 李治伟, 周平, 金洙吉. 粗糙薄层弹性体接触刚度分析[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2015, 35(1): 53-58.
[15] 王南山, 张学良, 兰国生, 等. 临界接触参数连续的粗糙表面法向接触刚度弹塑性分形模型 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(9): 72-77.