A preliminary study on accuracy of implant digital impression

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2020.01.021

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of implant digital impression,in order to provide guidance in digital implant prosthesis. METHODS: According to the requirements, 115 patients undergoing implantation were randomly selected. The implantation impression cap was placed and scanned with CBCT after esteosenesis. Oral cavity was scanned to make the 3D digital implantation model. The model data were obtained by scanning the digital resin implantation models. Based on the remaining teeth, the model data and CBCT data were matched in Nobel Clinicion software. RESULTS: The implantation impression cap in the patient's CBCT was completely matched and overlapped with the digital model in all of the occlusal, coronal and sagittal planes,which meant that the position, direction and angle of the implantation in the oral cavity were exactly the same as those in the digital model made by oral scanning. CONCLUSIONS: 3D digital resin model of oral scanning printing is completely accurate and can be popularized and applied in clinic.

Key words: Digital impression, Cone-beam CT, Dental implant, Dental scanning, Model scanning

CLC Number:

R782.1

DONG Zheng-jie, XU Kan. A preliminary study on accuracy of implant digital impression[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2020, 29(1): 102-104.

References

[1] 花菲. 三维数字化扫描在口腔临床中应用的研究[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2016,30(2): 105-108.
[2] Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, et al.Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2014, 30(14): 10.
[3] Aragón ML, Pontes LF, Bichara LM, et al.Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2016, 38(4): 429-434.
[4] Su TS, Sun J.Intraoral digital impression technique: a review[J]. J Prosthodont, 2015, 24(4): 313-321.
[5] Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M, et al.Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded,randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2016, 20(2): 291-300.
[6] 陈明, 赵三军. 数字化模拟修复体在前牙美学修复中的应用[J]. 中国美容医学, 2013, 22(19): 1956-1959.
[7] Wiersema EJ, Kreulen CM, Creugers NH.The conventional and the digital impression method for single-unit and multi-unit fixed dental prostheses[J]. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd, 2013, 120(7-8): 401-410.
[8] Almeida a Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, et al. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2014, 18(2): 515-523.
[9] EnderA, MehlA. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions[J]. Quintessence Int, 2015, 46(1): 9-17.
[10] 王亚妹,陈志宇,陈树国,等.不同数字印模技术对3D打印模型精度的影响[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(3): 313-316.
[11] 刘怀勤, 徐建华, 高宇, 等. 数字化技术与钛合金相结合在下颌骨缺损个体化修复中的应用[J]. 中国美容医学, 2014, 23(8): 627-630.
[12] Lee JJ, Jeong ID, Park JY, et al.Accuracy of single-abutmentdigital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(2): 253-259.
[13] Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, et al.Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial l landmark[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(6): 755-761.
[14] 姚江武. 数字化口腔修复(3)-直接数字化制造[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(2): 30-33.
[15] Malaguti G, Rossi R, Marziali B, et al.In vitro evaluation of prosthodontic impression on natural dentition:comparison between traditional and digital techniques[J]. Oral Implant (Rome), 2016, 9(suppl 1): 21-27.