Comparison of edge fitness and metal-ceramic bonding force of base metal crowns performed using two methods

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2019.06.008

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the marginal fitness and metal-ceramic bonding strength between laser printing metal crown and cast cobalt-chromium alloy crown. METHODS: Cobalt-chromium alloy crowns (n=10)(group A) were made by laser printing and another 10 by traditional casting (group B), respectively. All the first molar crowns were metal substitutes, and the basal crowns were placed in the standard substitutes. The marginal fitness of the basal crown was assessed by observing the margin of the basal crown and the shoulder gap of the substitution under stereomicroscope. Shear test of the basal crown was carried out by universal tester to evaluate the bonding strength between the metal and the porcelain. The differences of the marginal fitness and the bonding strength between the two methods of making basal crown were compared. SPSS 25.0 sofware package was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The gap between the metal base crown and the generation shoulder of group A was significantly smaller than that of group B[（48.52±5.26)μm vs (76.25±8.37)μm, P<0.05]. The intensity was significantly higher than that of group B [（11.35±3.29）N vs （7.24±2.07）N, P<0.05]. Under electron microscope, the metal layer of group A was more closely combined with the porcelain layer. CONCLUSIONS: The marginal fitness and bonding strength of metal base crowns made by laser printing and traditional casting methods are acceptable. Laser printing metal base crowns have better marginal fitness and stronger bonding strength between metal and porcelain, which is an ideal technology for metal base crowns.

Key words: Laser printing metal base crown, Cast cobalt-chromium alloy base crown, Edge fitness, Metal-ceramic bonding force

CLC Number:

R783.2

LIU Li, LI Bo, YU Yong-fang. Comparison of edge fitness and metal-ceramic bonding force of base metal crowns performed using two methods[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 28(6): 597-600.

References

[1] 徐梅, 杨帆, 王仁飞. 3种常用金属基底冠的边缘适合性评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(2): 154-156.
[2] 李靖敏, 王维倩, 马婧媛. 选择性激光熔化钴铬合金基底冠与铸造钴铬合金基底冠边缘适合性比较[J]. 口腔医学, 2014, 34(5): 353-355.
[3] 李英, 张岩, 王丽红. 经深冷处理后铸造纯钛烤瓷金瓷结合力的研究[J].中国药物与临床, 2016, 16(12): 1718-1721.
[4] 李国强, 华佳捷, 戴文安, 等. 激光熔覆技术(SLM)与传统铸造法钴铬金属基底冠的金瓷结合力比较研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2012, 32(5): 280-283.
[5] Rotaru H, Schumacher R, Kim SG, et al.Selective laser melted titanium implants: a new technique for the reconstruction of extensive zygomatic complex defects[J]. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015, 37(1): 1.
[6] Rana M, Gellrich MM, Gellrich NC.Customised reconstruction of the orbital wall and engineering of selective laser melting (SLM) core implants[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 53(2): 208-209.
[7] Chen J, Zhang Z, Chen X, et al.Design and manufacture of customized dental implants by using reverse engineering and selective laser melting technology[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(5): 1088-1095.
[8] 王娅婷, 林乃明, 唐宾. 钛及钛合金热氧化工艺的研究现状[J].腐蚀与防护, 2014, 35(10): 965-970.
[9] 许办. SLM钴铬合金的金瓷结合强度研究 [D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2016.
[10] 杨旭, 曾丽, 忻贤贞, 等. SLM 钴铬合金在含氟人工唾液中的电化学耐腐蚀性能研究[J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2014, 23(4): 189-193.
[11] Xin XZ, Chen J, Xiang N, et al.Surface characteristics and corrosion properties of selective laser melted Co-Cr dental alloy after porcelain firing[J]. Dent Mater, 2014, 30(3): 263-270.
[12] Wu L, Zhu H, Gai X, et al.Evaluation of the mechanical properties and porcelain bond strength of cobalt-chromium dental alloy fabricated by selective laser melting[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 111(1): 51-55.
[13] Matena J, Petersen S, Gieseke M, et al.SLM produced porous titanium implant improvements for enhanced vascularization and osteoblast seeding[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2015, 16(4): 7478-7492.
[14] Huang Z, Lu Z, Zhu J, et al.Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 113(6): 623-627.
[15] Nesse H, Ulstein DM, Vaaage MM, et al.Internal and marginal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses fabricated with 3 different techniques[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 114(5): 686-692.