Investigation of the micromorphological differences of the implant-abutment junction

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.04.005

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the morphological micro-features of 3 commercially available implant-abutment joints, using compatible and original prosthetic components and to explore the correlation between the micromorphology and potential functional complications. METHODS: Three abutments (one original and two compatibles) were torqued on original Straumann RN implants, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The implant-abutment units were sliced in the microtome and photographed under different magnifications through a scanning electron microscope. Calibration measurements were conducted under magnification corresponding to the area under assessment. RESULTS: Major dimensional differences were identified between all studied contact areas of the three units. The tight contact in the implant shoulder was similar in all three units, but engagement of the internal connection and, in particular, the anti-rotation elements were seriously compromised in the compatible abutments. One compatible abutment demonstrated compromised engagement of the abutment screw as well. CONCLUSIONS: Compatible abutments can present critical morphological differences from the original ones. The differences in the cross-sectional geometry result in large differences in the overall contact areas, both in terms of quality and quantity which could have serious implications from the long-term stability of the prosthesis.

Key words: Implant, Abutment, Junction, Micromorphology

CLC Number:

R782.1

LI Xiao-na, NIKOS Mattheos. Investigation of the micromorphological differences of the implant-abutment junction[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(4): 360-364.

References

[1] Pjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, et al.Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(Suppl): 308-324.
[2] Olerud E, Hagman-Gustafsson ML, Gabre P.Oral status, oral hygiene, and patient satisfaction in the elderly with dental implants dependent on substantial needs of care for daily living[J]. Spec Care Dentist, 2012, 32(2): 49-54.
[3] Manzoor B, Suleiman M, Palmer RM.The effects of simulated bone loss on the implant-abutment assembly and likelihood of fracture: an in vitro study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2013, 28(3): 729-738.
[4] Schulte JK, Coffey J.Comparison of screw retention of nine abutment systems: a pilot study[J]. Implant Dent, 1997, 6(1): 28-31.
[5] Johansson G, Palmqvist S.Complications, supplementary treatment, and maintenance in edentulous arches with implant-supported fixed prostheses[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 1990, 3(1): 89-92.
[6] Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, et al.Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2001, 86(1): 24-32.
[7] Mattheos N, Janda MS.Exotic encounters with dental implants: managing complications with unidentified systems[J]. Aust Dent J, 2012, 57(2): 236-242.
[8] Kitagawa T, Tanimoto Y, Odaki M, et al.Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2005, 75(2): 457-463.
[9] Kim KS, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, et al.Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(8): 834-839.
[10] Yousef H, Luke A, Ricci J, et al.Analysis of changes in implant screws subject to occlusal loading: a preliminary analysis[J]. Implant Dent, 2005, 14(4): 378-382.
[11] Kim SK, Koak JY, Heo SJ, et al.Screw loosening with interchangeable abutments in internally connected implants after cyclic loading[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012, 27(1): 42-47.
[12] Hamilton A, Judge RB, Palamara JE, et al.Evaluation of the fit of cad/cam abutments[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2013, 26(4): 370-380.
[13] Scarano A, Quaranta M, Traini T, et al.Sem and fractography analysis of screw thread loosening in dental implants[J]. Int J Immunopatyol Pharmacl, 2007, 20(Suppl 1): 19-22.
[14] Cardoso M, Torres MF, Lourenco EJ, et al.Removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening cycles: an in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(4): 475-480.
[15] Darendeliler MA, Zea A, Shen G, et al.Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field vibration on tooth movement induced by magnetic and mechanical forces: a preliminary study[J]. Aust Dent J, 2007, 52(4): 282-287.