Effect of flowablenano-composite on the bonding strength of tooth reattachment on fractured crowns

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2017.04.011

Abstract

Abstract: To study the effect of flowable nano-composite and different resin adhesives on reattachment of fractured crowns. METHODS: Thirty four fractured human maxillary incisors were obtained and randomly assigned into 4 groups and reattached using two types of adhesives: Easy one (EO) and Single bond 2(SB2), with or without Filtek Z350 flowable nano-composite. Four days after reattaching, the teeth were tested to achieve the shear bonding strength (SBS) and the recovery rate of fracture resistance after reattachment (R) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed by use of SPSS 20.0 software package. RESULTS: Using flowable nano-composite failed to increase the SBS and R.The recovery rates of the specimens using EO without flowable composite achieved the highest value and they were significantly higher than those of the specimens using SB2 without flowable composite (P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: If the fragment matches the fractured tooth perfectly, the tooth reattached using EO without composite will achieve higher bonding strength. However, not all the adhesives can be used to reattach without composite. Clinical decisions should be made on two aspects: whether the selected adhesive has sufficient mechanical strength and if there is any loss of tooth tissue after fracture.

Key words: Reattachment of fractured crown, Resin adhesives, Flowable nano-composite, Shear bonding strength, Recovery rate of fracture resistance

CLC Number:

R783.1

ZHAO Shi-min, HUANG Xiao, CHEN Hui, WANG Jun. Effect of flowablenano-composite on the bonding strength of tooth reattachment on fractured crowns[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2017, 26(4): 404-408.

References

[1] Munksgaard E, Jorgensen E, Andreasen J, et al. Enamel-dentin crown fractures bonded with various bonding agents [J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1991, 7(2): 73-77.
[2] Andreasen FM, Steinhardt U, Bllle M, et al. Bonding of enamel-dentin crown fragments after crown fracture. An experimental study using bonding agents[J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1993, 9(3): 111-114.
[3] Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Kimmes NS. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre-etched enamel[J]. Dent Mater, 2009, 25(10): 1187-1194.
[4] Lührs AK, Guhr S, Schilke R, et al. Shear bond strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel with additional phosphoric acid etching [J]. Oper Dent, 2008, 33(2): 155-162.
[5] 黄晓, 汪俊. 前牙冠折断端再接黏结效果的影响因素 [J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(5): 568-571.
[6] Rajput A, Ataide I, Lambor R, et al. In vitro study comparing fracture strength recovery of teeth restored with three esthetic bonding materials using different techniques [J]. Eur J Esthet Dent, 2010, 5(4): 398-411.
[7] 陈晖, 黄晓, 赵是民, 等. 选择性酸蚀技术用于断冠再接的研究 [J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2016, 25(3): 122-127.
[8] Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Kreiborg S, et al. Adhesive bonding of fragmented anterior teeth [J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1998, 14(3): 119-123.
[9] Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO, et al. Fractured teeth bonded with dentin adhesives with and without unfilled resin [J]. Dent Traumatol, 2002, 18(2): 66-69.
[10] Demarco FF, Fay RM, Pinzon LM. Fracture resistance of reattached cornal fragment influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation [J]. Dent Traumatol, 2004, 20(3): 157-163.
[11] Bhargava M, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, et al. An evaluation of various materials and tooth preparation designs used for reattachment of fractured incisors[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2010, 26(5): 409-412.
[12] Reis A, Kraul A, Francci C, et al. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different materials [J]. Oper Dent, 2002, 27(6): 621-627.
[13] Kovács M, Pǎcurar M, Pop M, et al. Fracture resistance of tooth fragments reattached with different techniques. An in vitro study [J]. Rom J Oral Rehabil, 2012, 4(4): 36-41.
[14] Davari A, Sadeghi M. Influence of different bonding agents and composite resins on fracture resistance of reattached incisal tooth fragment [J]. J Dent, 2014, 15(1): 6-14.
[15] Chazine M, Sedda M, Ounsi HF, et al. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of reattached incisal fragments using different materials and techniques [J]. Dent Traumatol, 2011, 27(1): 15-18.
[16] Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO, et al. Drying and rewetting anterior crown fragment prior to bondin [J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1999, 15(3): 113-116.
[17] Bruschi-Alonso RC, Alonso RC, Correr GM, et al. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength [J]. Dent Traumatol, 2010, 26(4): 315-322.
[18] Stellini E, Stomaci D, Stomaci M, et al. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction [J]. Dent Traumatol, 2008, 24(3): 283-288.
[19] Macedo GV, Diaz PI, De O Femandes CA, et al. Reattachment of anterior teeth fragments: a conservative approach [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2008, 20(1): 5-18; discussion 19-20.
[20] Salvio LA, Hipolito VD, Martins AL, et al. Hybridization quality and bond strength of adhesive systems according to interaction with dentin [J]. Eur J Dent, 2013, 7(3): 315-326.