上海口腔医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 313-317.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2022.03.018

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字化印模联合全瓷冠修复牙体缺损的临床疗效分析

陈丽荣, 梁学进, 杨凤英, 罗浩   

  1. 湖北医药学院附属东风口腔医院 口腔修复科,湖北 十堰 442001
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-03 修回日期:2021-08-24 出版日期:2022-06-25 发布日期:2022-07-07
  • 通讯作者: 陈丽荣,E-mail:262764652@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈丽荣(1983-),女, 硕士,主治医师
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省高校训练项目(S202010929023)

Clinical effect of digital impression combined with all-ceramic denture on restoration of 60 patients with dental defects

CHEN Li-rong, LIANG Xue-jin, YANG Feng-ying, LUO Hao   

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, Dongfeng Stomatological Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine. Shiyan 442001, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2021-06-03 Revised:2021-08-24 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-07

摘要: 目的: 分析数字化印模联合全瓷冠修复牙体缺损的临床疗效。方法: 选择2018年6月—2020年6月东风口腔医院120例牙体缺损患者,随机分为硅橡胶印模和数字印模2组,每组60例。硅橡胶印模组采用硅胶印模联合全瓷冠修复,数字印模组采用数字印模联合全瓷冠修复,观察2组的修复效果,牙体修复前、戴牙时和戴牙后6个月牙龈指数(GI)、牙周指数(PI)、邻面接触情况、咬合度合格率及不良反应。采用SPSS 22.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 2组患者对修复体评价均选择A级和B级,数字印模组选择A级的人数多于硅橡胶印模组,但无显著差异(P>0.05)。戴牙后6个月,2组患者的GI、PI指数均增高,硅橡胶印模组显著高于数字印模组(P<0.05)。戴牙时和戴牙后6个月,数字印模组邻面接触合格率显著高于硅橡胶印模组(P<0.05)。戴牙时,数字印模组患者咬合度显著高于硅橡胶印模组(P<0.05)。戴牙后6个月,2组患者咬合度无显著差异(P>0.05)。制取模型时,数字印模组患者不良反应发生率显著低于硅橡胶印模组(P<0.05)。结论: 运用数字化印模联合全瓷冠对牙体缺损患者进行修复,能有效提高工作效率,改善患者GI、PI指数,提升牙体邻面接触及咬合度合格率,降低不良反应发生率。

关键词: 全瓷义齿修复, 牙体缺损, 牙龈指数, 牙周指数

Abstract: PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical effect of digital impression combined with all-ceramic denture restoration on patients with dental defects. METHODS: A study was conducted on 120 patients with dental defects admitted to Dongfeng Stomatological Hospital from June 2018 to June 2020. The two groups of patients were randomly divided into digital imprinting modules and silicone rubber imprinting modules using a random number table method. There were 60 cases in each group. The silicone rubber imprint module used traditional silicone impression combined with all-ceramic denture restoration, while the digital imprint module used digital impression combined with all-ceramic denture restoration.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed. Gingival index (GI), periodontal index (PI) before dental restoration, during dental restoration and 6 monthes after dental restoration were compared. The adjacent surface contact conditions, occlusion and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. SPSS 22.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The two groups of patients selected grade A and grade B for the evaluation of the restoration when the restoration was completed. The number of patients who chose grade A for the digital imprint module was more than that of the silicone rubber imprint module,but there was no significant difference(P>0.05). Six months after the tooth was worn, GI and PI indexes of the two groups of patients increased. GI and PI indexes of the silicone rubber stamping module were significantly higher than those of the digital stamping module(P<0.05). When dental restoration was completed and 6 months after the tooth was replaced, the pass rate of contact between the adjacent surfaces of the imprinting module patients was significantly higher than that of the silicone rubber imprinting module(P<0.05). When dental restoration was completed, the occlusion of the digital imprinting module patients was significantly better than that of the silicone rubber imprinting module(P<0.05). Six months after wearing the denture, there was no significant difference in occlusion between the two groups of patients(P>0.05). When dental models of the two groups of patients were taken, the incidence of adverse reactions in patients with digital imprints was significantly lower than that of silicone rubber imprints(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of digital impressions combined with all-ceramic restorations to repair patients with dental defects can effectively improve the treatment effect, improve prognostic GI and PI indexes of the patients, increase the pass rate of the adjacent surface contact and occlusion of the tooth, and reduce the process of dental restoration. The incidence of adverse reactions are minimal, with good prognostic effects. It is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: All-porcelain denture, Dental defects, Gingival index, Periodontal index

中图分类号: