2种羟基磷灰石复合材料在上颌窦内提升术植骨同期植入种植体中的临床效果

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2022.03.008

上海口腔医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 265-269.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2022.03.008

2种羟基磷灰石复合材料在上颌窦内提升术植骨同期植入种植体中的临床效果

刘芳¹, 李振², 谢小飞¹, 路晓淼¹, 张容秀¹, 徐丽¹, 张凯¹

1.蚌埠医学院第一附属医院口腔科,安徽蚌埠 233004;
2.南京市口腔医院种植科,江苏南京 210018

收稿日期:2021-07-29 修回日期:2021-09-24 出版日期:2022-06-25 发布日期:2022-07-07
通讯作者: 张凯,E-mail：22353979@qq.com
作者简介:刘芳（1983-）,女,硕士,主治医师,E-mail：DentistLiu711F@163.com
基金资助:
安徽省科学技术厅攻关项目（1804h08020290）

Clinical effects of two different hydroxyapatite bone graft materials during maxillary sinus lifting surgery with bone grafting and simultaneous implantation of implants

LIU Fang¹, LI Zhen², XIE Xiao-fei¹, LU Xiao-miao¹, ZHANG Rong-xiu¹, XU Li¹, ZHANG Kai¹

1. Department of Stomatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College. Bengbu 233004, Anhui Province;
2. Department of Implantology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital. Nanjing 210018,Jiangsu Province,China

Received:2021-07-29 Revised:2021-09-24 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 比较2种羟基磷灰石复合材料在上颌窦内提升术植骨同期植入种植体中的临床效果。方法: 收集2018年3月—2019年4月蚌埠医学院第一附属医院收治的上颌后牙区种植、骨量不足患者72例,以随机数字表法分为实验组（36例）和对照组（36例）,对照组放置羟基磷灰石复合材料,实验组放置纳米羟基磷灰石复合材料。比较2组种植体植入的临床效果、骨增量、骨密度等情况,统计2组术后种植体稳定性及并发症发生情况。采用SPSS 18.0软件包进行统计学分析。结果: 实验组24个月的种植体存留率显著高于对照组（P<0.05）,实验组术后6个月的牙槽骨骨吸收量显著低于对照组（P<0.05）,实验组术后6个月、12个月的种植体牙槽骨骨密度显著高于对照组（P<0.05）,实验组术后12个月的种植体稳定系数值显著高于对照组（P<0.05）。2组术后总并发症发生率相比无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论: 上颌窦内提升术放置纳米羟基磷灰石复合材料同期植入种植体存留率高,可改善术后骨代谢,增强种植体稳定性,且安全性良好。

关键词: 植骨材料, 种植体, 效果

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effects of two different hydroxyapatite bone graft materials in maxillary sinus lifting surgery with bone grafting and implantation at the same time. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with implantation in the maxillary posterior dental area and insufficient bone mass admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College were collected from March 2018 to April 2019, and they were divided into experimental group(n=36) and control group(n=36) by random number table. Patients in the control group used hydroxyapatite composite material, while patients in the experimental group used nano-hydroxyapatite composite material. The clinical effects, bone increment and bone density changes of the two groups of implants were compared, and postoperative implant stability and complications of the two groups were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 18.0 software package. RESULTS: The survival rate of implants in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 24 months (P<0.05). Alveolar bone resorption in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group 6 months after surgery(P<0.05). The bone mineral density of implants in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group 6 months and 12 months after operation(P<0.05). The implant stability coefficient value of the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group 12 months after operation(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total complication rate between the two groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In maxillary sinus lift, the survival rate of nano-hydroxyapatite composite material implanted in the same period is high, which can improve postoperative bone metabolism and increase implant stability with good safety.

Key words: Bone graft material, Implant, Effect

中图分类号:

R782.1

刘芳, 李振, 谢小飞, 路晓淼, 张容秀, 徐丽, 张凯. 2种羟基磷灰石复合材料在上颌窦内提升术植骨同期植入种植体中的临床效果[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 265-269.

LIU Fang, LI Zhen, XIE Xiao-fei, LU Xiao-miao, ZHANG Rong-xiu, XU Li, ZHANG Kai. Clinical effects of two different hydroxyapatite bone graft materials during maxillary sinus lifting surgery with bone grafting and simultaneous implantation of implants[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2022, 31(3): 265-269.

参考文献

[1] Cortellini P, Stalpers G, Mollo A, et al.Periodontal regeneration versus extraction and dental implant or prosthetic replacement of teeth severely compromised by attachment loss to the apex: a randomized controlled clinical trial reporting 10-year outcomes, survival analysis and mean cumulative cost of recurrence[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47(6): 768-776.
[2] Patel RM.Dental implants for patients with periodontitis[J]. Prim Dent J, 2020, 8(4): 54-61.
[3] Ritter A, Rozendorn N, Avishai G, et al.Preoperative maxillary sinus imaging and the outcome of sinus floor augmentation and dental implants in asymptomatic patients[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2020, 129(3): 209-215.
[4] 陈文渊,陈翔,林晓炜,等. 上颌窦底提升术同期种植体长期存活率的影响因素分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(5):539-543.
[5] 黄娜, 吴锋, 李平, 等. 应用浓缩生长因子行上颌窦内提升后种植体周围骨变化[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2015, 19(47): 7575-7582.
[6] Menassa G, Kassir AR, Landi L, et al.Implant placement with sinus floor elevation via the lateral approach using only absorbable collagen sponge: 12-month post-loading radiographical outcomes and implant survival rate[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 25(2): 231-236.
[7] Bordea IR, Candrea S, Alexescu GT, et al.Nano-hydroxyapatite use in dentistry: a systematic review[J]. Drug Metab Rev, 2020, 52(2):319-332.
[8] 曹采方. 牙周病学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2003: 95-126.
[9] Shi N, Guo S, Su Y, et al.Improvement in the retention rate of transplanted fat in muscle by denervation[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2018, 38(9):1026-1034.
[10] Adel-Khattab D, Afifi NS, Abu El Sadat SM, et al. Bone regeneration and graft material resorption in extraction sockets grafted with bioactive silica-calcium phosphate composite (SCPC) versus non-grafted sockets: clinical, radiographic, and histological findings[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2020, 50(6): 418-434.
[11] 李芳, 程余婷, 黄晓林, 等. 上颌窦底骨增量是否需要使用骨移植材料[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2019, 23(6):971-977.
[12] Younes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyckere T, et al.A 2-year prospective case series on volumetric changes, PROMs, and clinical outcomes following sinus floor elevation using deproteinized bovine bone mineral as filling material[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21(2):301-309.
[13] Arcos D, Vallet-Regí M.Substituted hydroxyapatite coatings of bone implants[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2020, 8(9):1781-1800.
[14] Bordea IR, Candrea S, Alexescu GT, et al.Nano-hydroxyapatite use in dentistry: a systematic review[J]. Drug Metab Rev, 2020, 52(2):319-332.
[15] Gizer M, Kose S, Karaosmanoglu B, et al.The effect of boron-containing nano-hydroxyapatite on bone cells[J]. Biol Trace Elem Res, 2020, 193(2): 364-376.
[16] Luo W, Huang Y, Zhou X, et al.The effect of disaggregated nano-hydroxyapatite on oral biofilm in vitro[J]. Dent Mater, 2020, 36(7):207-216.
[17] Wang R, Hu H, Guo J, et al.Nano-hydroxyapatite modulates osteoblast differentiation through autophagy induction via mTOR signaling pathway[J]. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 2019, 15(2):405-415.

2种羟基磷灰石复合材料在上颌窦内提升术植骨同期植入种植体中的临床效果

Clinical effects of two different hydroxyapatite bone graft materials during maxillary sinus lifting surgery with bone grafting and simultaneous implantation of implants

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	连梅菲, 张修银, 唐天弘, 忻贤贞. 数字化配准法测量种植体植入精度分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 287-291.
[2]	杨治洁, 唐庭, 刘堃, 张磊, 翟沁凯. 影响种植体生存时间的相关因素分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 292-297.
[3]	卢雨桐, 史俊宇, 赖红昌. Astra锥形种植体在上颌窦穿牙槽嵴顶提升术中的短期效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 302-307.
[4]	杨晶晶, 毛卫华, 余正荣, 魏洪武, 郭水根. 短种植体随访7~9年的临床疗效及危险因素分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 214-219.
[5]	谢雪梅, 张佳园, 张野, 俞晓佳, 刘李明, 王健, 于德栋. 龈沟液中sICAM-1、IL-1β和HIF-1α水平与义齿种植修复并发种植体周围炎的关系[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 47-51.
[6]	徐晓乾, 李镭. 种植义齿生物学并发症危险因素的回顾性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 69-74.
[7]	胡宁, 李凤丹, 江银华. 植骨与否对上颌窦底内提升同期种植术临床疗效的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 101-104.
[8]	涂慧娟, 李凌宇, 李医丹, 罗真兰, 俞明. Er:YAG激光联合引导骨再生治疗种植体周围炎伴骨缺损效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 418-422.
[9]	吕晓蕾, 史俊宇, 钱姝娇, 赖红昌. 上颌前牙美学区单颗种植修复体应用角度螺丝通道系统基台和预成钛基台的短期临床疗效比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 423-428.
[10]	肖莎, 高承志, 周冬平. 全瓷高嵌体修复前磨牙缺损的近、远期效果及对牙功能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 300-304.
[11]	曹伟玉, 曹捷, 刘宾益, 徐舟. 2种不同种植体植入对种植体周围软组织的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 305-308.
[12]	石俊, 关振群, 王训霞. 种植体黏膜与种植体乳头水平及周围软组织稳定性的关系探讨[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 75-78.
[13]	段咏华, 俞敏, 潘亮, 林华俊, 郭美玲. 单纯种植体与天然牙联合种植体的临床修复效果及影响因素分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 84-88.
[14]	黄文青, 李羽, 杨健. 不同预处理方法对龋齿牙本质微渗漏和粘结效果的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 585-588.
[15]	虞瑾, 曾晓莉, 江一巍, 王沪宁, 张皓, 笪东欣, 张颖. 应用决策树模型评价3~5岁儿童含氟涂料防龋的经济学效果[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 639-643.