磨牙缺失颌间距离不足种植体支持的螺丝固位一体冠修复临床分析

doi:10.19438/j.sjos.2017.04.014

上海口腔医学 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 419-424.doi: 10.19438/j.sjos.2017.04.014

磨牙缺失颌间距离不足种植体支持的螺丝固位一体冠修复临床分析

陈冬雷^{1, 2}, 徐景明¹, 吴自强¹, 汪乔那¹, 王培¹, 汤易¹, 汤春波¹

1.南京医科大学口腔医学研究所,南京医科大学附属口腔医院种植修复科,江苏南京 210029；
2.南通市口腔医院种植科,江苏南通 226001

收稿日期:2016-09-18 修回日期:2017-04-04 出版日期:2017-08-25 发布日期:2017-09-01
通讯作者: 汤春波,E-mail: cbtang@njmu.edu.cn
作者简介:陈冬雷（1990-）,男,硕士,E-mail:1335958873@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（81470778）; 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目（2014-37）

A clinical analysis of screw-retained implant-supported casted integrated abutment crowns in the molar region with limited interocclusal space

CHEN Dong-lei^{1, 2}, XU Jing-ming¹, WU Zi-qiang¹, WANG Qiao-na¹, WANG Pei¹, TANG Yi¹, TANG Chun-bo¹

1.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Department of Implantology, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University. Nanjing 210029;
2.Department of Dental Implantation, Nantong Stomatological Hospital. Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China

Received:2016-09-18 Revised:2017-04-04 Online:2017-08-25 Published:2017-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察磨牙缺失颌间距离不足种植体支持的螺丝固位一体冠修复体的临床效果。方法选取376例磨牙缺失、颌间距离不足,不能满足常规种植修复5~7 mm的修复空间的患者,共计507颗种植体,采用常规种植一期手术,并运用种植体支持的螺丝固位一体冠修复。随访6个月~2 a,记录螺丝固位的一体冠修复体的临床效果,采用SPSS 17.0 软件包对数据进行方差分析和χ2检验。结果经过6个月~2 a的随访观察,种植体存留率为99.61%,37例患者发生崩瓷 ,主要发生在3~4 mm组。在各组别中,烤瓷修复比金属面烤瓷更容易发生崩瓷（P<0.05）;颌间距离越小,越容易发生崩瓷（P<0.05）。13件修复体发生螺丝松动,13例患者出现牙龈红肿,探诊出血。经牙周治疗及口腔卫生宣教后恢复良好。患者满意度较高。结论种植体支持的螺丝固位一体冠修复设计可以解决磨牙区颌间距离不足的缺牙患者的修复难题,治疗效果良好。

关键词: 颌间距离不足, 磨牙, 螺丝固位, 一体冠, 种植修复

Abstract: To observe the clinical effects of screw-retained implant-supported casted abutment integrated crowns (IACs) in the molar region with limited interocclusal space. METHODS: This study involved 507 implants in 376 patients with limited interocclusal space in the molar region. All implants were inserted to the jaw by standard one-stage protocol. Screw-retained IACs were used as the final prosthesis. With 6 to 24 months follow-up, the clinical effects of screw-retained IACs were recorded and analyzed using SPSS 17.0 software package. RESULTS: During 6 to 24 months of follow-up, the implant survival rate was 99.61%. 37 patients had ceramic fracture which mainly happened in the group with 3-4 mm interocclusal space. In each group, porcelain fused to metal (PFM) prosthesis had ceramic fracture more easily than PFM prosthesis without porcelain on occlusal surface(P<0.05). As the interocclusal space became smaller, the probability of collapsing porcelain increased(P<0.05).13 patients had screw loosening. 13 patients suffered from gingival swelling and bleeding, they were given periodontal treatment and oral hygiene instruction. Patients were satisfied with the restoration results. CONCLUSIONS: Screw-retained IACs can be used to repair missing teeth in the molar region with limited interocclusal space.

Key words: Limited interocclusal space, Molars, Screw-retained, Integrated abutment crowns, Implant restoration

中图分类号:

R783.4

陈冬雷, 徐景明, 吴自强, 汪乔那, 王培, 汤易, 汤春波. 磨牙缺失颌间距离不足种植体支持的螺丝固位一体冠修复临床分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(4): 419-424.

CHEN Dong-lei, XU Jing-ming, WU Zi-qiang, WANG Qiao-na, WANG Pei, TANG Yi, TANG Chun-bo. A clinical analysis of screw-retained implant-supported casted integrated abutment crowns in the molar region with limited interocclusal space[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2017, 26(4): 419-424.

参考文献

[1] 皮昕. 口腔解剖生理学[M]. 第6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2007.
[2] Kubo KY, Iwaku F, Watanabe K, et al. Molarless-induced changes of spines in hippocampal region of SAMP8 mice [J]. Brain Res, 2005, 1057(1-2): 191-195.
[3] Watanabe K, Tonosaki K, Kawase T, et al. Evidence for involvement of dysfunctional teeth in the senile process in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice[J]. Exp Gerontol, 2001, 36(2): 283-295.
[4] Aoki H, Kimoto K, Hori N, et al. Molarless condition suppresses proliferation but not differentiation rates into neurons in the rat dentate gyrus [J]. Neurosci Lett, 2010, 469(1): 44-48.
[5] Onozuka M, Watanabe K, Fujita M, et al. Changes in the septohippocampal cholinergic system following removal of molar teeth in the aged SAMP8 mouse[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2002, 133(2):197-204.
[6] 林野．当代口腔种植学进展及其临床意义[J]．口腔颌面外科杂志, 2006, 16(4): 285-290．
[7] 刘林娟, 朱志军, 沈铭. 短种植体在骨量不足上颌后牙区的临床应用 [J].口腔医学, 2015, 35(10): 850-853.
[8] 杨小竺, 裴仲秋, 李晓东, 等. 咬合异常患者的种植修复方案设计 [J].重庆医学, 2009, 38(23): 2928-929.
[9] Geckili O, Sakar O, Yurdakuloglu T, et al. Multidisciplinary management of limited interocclusal space: a clinical report [J]. J Prosthodont, 2011, 20(4):329-332.
[10] 汪乔那, 李明, 邱憬, 等. 一体式可拆卸套筒冠固定桥在无牙牙合种植修复中的应用 [J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(6): 702-707.
[11] Cardoso RG, Melo LA, Barbosa GA, et al. Impact of mandibular conventional denture and overdenture on quality of life and masticatory efficiency [J]. Braz Oral Res, 2016, 30(1): e102.
[12] Palmer RM. Risk management in clinical practice. Part 9. Dental implants [J]. Brit Dent J, 2010, 209(10): 499-506.
[13] Rose TP, Jivraj S, Chee W. The role of orthodontics in implant dentistry [J]. Brit Dent J, 2006, 201(12): 753-764.
[14] Lee HE, Lee KT, Tseng YC, et al. Interdisciplinary management of unfavorable posterior intermaxillary space [J]. Brit J Oral Max Sur, 2008, 46(5): 413-415.
[15] 孙为, 施斌. 后牙种植的颌间距离调整及修复体的冠-种植体比例 [J].中国实用口腔科杂志, 2009, 2(11): 641-643.
[16] 姚倩倩, 叶俊, 刘雯雯, 等. 后牙种植义齿一体化冠修复及软组织整复效果的评价 [J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2011, 16(1): 21-22.
[17] Ferreiroa A, Pe?觡arrochadiago M, Pradíes G, et al. Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years [J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2015, 7(1): e89-94.
[18] Urdaneta RA, Leary J, Panetta KM, et al. The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single-tooth implants [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014, 25(2): e179-188.
[19] Shapoff CA, Lahey BJ. Crestal bone loss and the consequences of retained excess cement around dental implants [J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2012, 33(2): 94-96.
[20] Gapski R, Neugeboren N, Pomeranz AZ, et al. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: a clinical case report [J]. Int J Oral Max Implants, 2008, 23(5): 943-946.

磨牙缺失颌间距离不足种植体支持的螺丝固位一体冠修复临床分析

A clinical analysis of screw-retained implant-supported casted integrated abutment crowns in the molar region with limited interocclusal space

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁炎婷, 谢萍, 李晴, 覃梦婷, 黎宴伶, 邓敏. 3种序列咬合纸选磨调方式对单颗磨牙种植延迟咬合特征的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 209-213.
[2]	谢雪梅, 张佳园, 张野, 俞晓佳, 刘李明, 王健, 于德栋. 龈沟液中sICAM-1、IL-1β和HIF-1α水平与义齿种植修复并发种植体周围炎的关系[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 47-51.
[3]	周子芊, 陈振琦. 上颌窦底对上颌第一磨牙近中移动的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 661-667.
[4]	林翔, 傅裕杰, 任根强, 温佳欢, 陈宇飞, 张旗. U-Net神经网络分割锥形束CT影像中下颌磨牙牙体与牙髓腔及其准确性验证[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 454-459.
[5]	张怡雯, 邹多宏, 张志愿. 不同方式处理犬下颌磨牙区即刻种植间隙的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 337-342.
[6]	阎旭, 芈大卫, 赵明, 彭勃. 预成型钛网联合浓缩生长因子膜修复31例前牙种植区骨量不足的疗效分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 406-409.
[7]	曹伟玉, 曹捷, 刘宾益, 徐舟, 陆卫青. 2种种植修复制作工艺的Ti-base基台一体冠用于口腔种植单冠修复精度的研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 414-417.
[8]	吕晓蕾, 史俊宇, 钱姝娇, 赖红昌. 上颌前牙美学区单颗种植修复体应用角度螺丝通道系统基台和预成钛基台的短期临床疗效比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 423-428.
[9]	肖莎, 高承志, 周冬平. 全瓷高嵌体修复前磨牙缺损的近、远期效果及对牙功能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 300-304.
[10]	刘莉萍, 杨彤彤, 程佳秀. 骨性Ⅱ类上颌磨牙后间隙解剖特征分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 410-413.
[11]	张停停, 胡晓菁, 林璐. 种植体植入15年内种植体周围炎和种植周黏膜炎发生率调查[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(3): 292-296.
[12]	黄成, 周淳, 徐珉华, 邹德荣. 下颌第三磨牙萌出状态与舌侧骨板厚度的相关性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 187-191.
[13]	吴峥嵘, 左园林, 李朝晖. 自体牙本质颗粒结合富血小板纤维蛋白膜治疗93例下颌第一磨牙根分叉病变效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 213-216.
[14]	常忠福, 姜丹丹, 张志荣, 蔡建英. 口腔种植修复术在牙列缺损患者中的应用效果及对龈沟液中TNF-α、IL-6水平的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 217-220.
[15]	林颋旭, 赵宁, 钱文昊, 马晓晴. 铸造支架联合NITI悬臂梁矫正舌倾下颌磨牙的临床效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 666-669.