自锁托槽与传统托槽导致正畸牙根吸收的锥形束CT比较

上海口腔医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 238-241.

自锁托槽与传统托槽导致正畸牙根吸收的锥形束CT比较

刘筠^1*，郭宏铭²

1.杭州口腔医院正畸中心,浙江杭州 310005；
2.首都医科大学附属北京口腔医院正畸科,北京 100050

收稿日期:2015-07-13 修回日期:2015-09-26 出版日期:2016-03-25 发布日期:2016-05-06
作者简介:刘筠(1983-),女,硕士,主治医师刘筠,E-mail: liuyun0825@126.com

Comparison of root resorption between self-ligating and conventional brackets using cone-beam CT

LIU Yun¹,GUO Hong-ming²

1.Department of Orthodontics, Hangzhou Dental Hospital. Hangzhou 310005,Zhejiang Province;
2.Department of Orthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University. Beijing 100050, China

Received:2015-07-13 Revised:2015-09-26 Online:2016-03-25 Published:2016-05-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:比较被动自锁托槽与传统直丝弓托槽造成牙根根尖外吸收量的差异,分析被动自锁托槽与牙根吸收的关系。方法:将50例患者随机分为2组,每组25例,分别应用被动自锁托槽或传统直丝弓托槽(0.022系统)进行矫治。治疗前、后拍摄锥形束CT(CBCT),测量上切牙的牙根根尖外吸收量。采用SPSS17.0软件包对2组牙根根尖外吸收量的差异进行t检验。结果:被动自锁托槽和传统直丝弓托槽治疗结束后,上颌切牙牙根吸收量无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:被动自锁托槽和传统直丝弓托槽都会造成一定量的牙根吸收,但两者造成的牙根根尖外吸收量差异无显著性,不能认为被动自锁托槽会诱发更多的牙根吸收。

关键词: 自锁托槽, 传统直丝弓托槽, 牙根吸收, 锥形束CT

Abstract: PURPOSE: To analyze the differences of root resorption between passive self-ligating and conventional brackets, and to determine the relationship between passive self-ligating brackets and root resorption. METHODS: Fifty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups using passive self-ligating brackets or conventional straight wire brackets (0.022 system), respectively. Cone-beam CT was taken before and after treatment. The amount of external apical root resorption of maxillary incisors was measured on CBCT images. Student's t test was performed to analyze the differences of root apical resorption between the 2 groups with SPSS17.0 software package. RESULTS: No significant difference(P> 0.05) in root resorption of maxillary incisors was found between passive self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets. CONCLUSIONS: Passive self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets can cause root resorption, but the difference was not significant. Passive self-ligating brackets do not induce more root resorption.

Key words: Self-ligating brackets, Conventional brackets, External apical root resorption, Cone-beam CT

中图分类号:

R783.5

刘筠，郭宏铭. 自锁托槽与传统托槽导致正畸牙根吸收的锥形束CT比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 238-241.

LIU Yun,GUO Hong-ming. Comparison of root resorption between self-ligating and conventional brackets using cone-beam CT[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2016, 25(2): 238-241.

参考文献

Malmgren O, Levander E. Minimizing orthodontically induced root resorption//Graber T, Eliades T, Athanasiou AE. Risk management in orthodontics: experts'guide to malpractice . Chicago: Quintessence, 2004: 61-75.
Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM. Predicting and preventing root resorption: part I. Diagnostic factors . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001,119(5): 505-510.
Lee RY, ?魧rtun J, Alonzo TA. Are dental anomalies risk factorsfor apical root resorption in orthodontic patients? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999, 116(2): 187-195.
Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. Part Ⅱ: The clinical aspects . Angle Orthod, 2002,72(2): 180-184.
Segal GR, Schiffman PH, Tuncay OC. Meta analysis of thetreatment-related factors of external apical root resorption . Orthod Craniofac Res, 2004, 7(2): 71-78.
rtun J, Smale I, Behbehani F, et al. Apical root resorption six and twelve months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy .Angle Orthod, 2005, 75(6): 919-926.
Mavragani M, Vergari A, Selliseth NJ, et al. A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with a standard edgewise and a straight-wire edgewise technique . Eur J Orthod, 2000, 22(6): 665-674.
Beck BW, Harris EF. Apical root resorption in orthodontically treated subjects: analysis of edgewise and light wire mechanics . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1994, 105(4):350-361.
Berger J, Byloff FK. The clinical efficiency of self-ligated brackets . J Clin Orthod, 2001, 35(5): 304-308.
Chen SS, Greenlee GM, Kim J, et al. Systematic review of self-ligating brackets . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(6): 726.e1-726.e18.
Vajaria R, BeGole E, Kusnoto B, et al. Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimensional changes using the Damon system . Angle Orthod, 2011, 81(4): 647-652.
Sameshima GT, Asgarifar KO. Assessment of root resorption and root shape: periapical vs panoramic films . Angle Orthod, 2001, 71(3): 185-189.
Marmulla R, W rtche R, Mühling J, et al. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol,2005, 34(1): 28-31.
Chan EK, Darendeliler MA, Petocz P, et al. A new method for volumetric measurement of orthodontically induced root resorption craters . Eur J Oral Sci, 2004, 112(2): 134-139.

[1]	王文丽, 傅亚婷, 刘华, 马潇. 上颌前牙美学区牙龈三维形态的锥形束CT测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 177-182.
[2]	张薇, 陈威, 陈志方. 可调式活动牵引器治疗上颌唇侧倒置阻生中切牙效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 193-197.
[3]	宋珏, 刘好好, 刘嘉靓, 陈美华. 上颌磨牙与上颌窦黏膜增厚发生的相关性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 638-642.
[4]	吕云松, 李朝晖. 颞下颌关节紊乱综合征伴偏侧咀嚼患者锥形束CT特征分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 653-656.
[5]	周子芊, 陈振琦. 上颌窦底对上颌第一磨牙近中移动的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 661-667.
[6]	林翔, 傅裕杰, 任根强, 温佳欢, 陈宇飞, 张旗. U-Net神经网络分割锥形束CT影像中下颌磨牙牙体与牙髓腔及其准确性验证[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 454-459.
[7]	马智菲, 周梦琪, 王丽珍, 承清, 洪瑾. Er:YAG 激光在小型猪牙髓血运重建术中的应用效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 367-373.
[8]	黄锦程, 赵华强, 李国菊. Stafne骨腔影像学特征：基于CBCT的回顾性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 439-444.
[9]	尹悦, 陶硕, 张旗. 人牙周膜成纤维细胞来源外泌体对大鼠延期牙再植术后牙根吸收的调控作用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 232-236.
[10]	朱永翠, 朱凤节, 翟蕾, 崔淑霞. 无托槽隐形矫治器及自锁托槽矫治器对牙周炎患者牙周及龈下菌群的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 184-188.
[11]	林怡君, 鄢洁雅, 王天鸽, 周志捷, 廖盛轩, 毛丽霞, 刘加强. 减数正畸治疗中中切牙牙根及牙槽骨形态变化的锥形束CT测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 211-216.
[12]	杜悦, 彭笑, 韩瑞, 王栋, 胡洁, 高廷益, 张凯. 颌骨囊肿开窗治疗临床特征动态研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 658-662.
[13]	马晓晴, 赵宁, 董晛, 钱文昊. 2种锥形束CT转化头颅侧位片的定点一致性探讨[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 522-525.
[14]	毛晓燕, 杨佳音, 李佳, 徐睿. 成人骨性Ⅱ类错畸形上气道与上、下颌骨形态分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 419-423.
[15]	郑美里, 吕政展, 朱柏恺, 汪席均, 瞿然奕, 樊林峰, 江凌勇. 成人上颌骨性扩弓疗效评价及对面中部相邻骨块的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(3): 316-322.